Emergency clinician perceptions of patients who present frequently to the emergency department: a snapshot of current practice.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Viola Korczak, Hueiming Liu, Kendall Bein, Thomas Lung, Stephen Jan, Michael Dinh
{"title":"Emergency clinician perceptions of patients who present frequently to the emergency department: a snapshot of current practice.","authors":"Viola Korczak,&nbsp;Hueiming Liu,&nbsp;Kendall Bein,&nbsp;Thomas Lung,&nbsp;Stephen Jan,&nbsp;Michael Dinh","doi":"10.1071/AH22160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This study aimed to assess emergency clinician perceptions of adult patients who present frequently to the emergency department (ED) in an Australian context and understand current practices. Methods ED clinicians including general practitioners, career medical officers and nurse unit managers working at New South Wales Australia level 3-6 hospitals were surveyed. Responses to open-ended questions were independently coded by two reviewers and the main themes were analysed. Results Almost all the 210 participants (99%) could identify a population of frequent ED presenters at their hospital. Participants suggested that 9-12 presentations per year was a useful benchmark to use to characterise frequent ED presentations. They also indicated the need to consider as criteria recurrent presentations, their complexity, disease category and timeframe. Participants believed that the cause for presentation, from a restricted list of clinical alternatives, was multifactorial but the single most common cause for presentation was thought to be mental health followed by drug and alcohol. A total of 73% of participants reported that their hospitals had interventions to address frequent ED presentations, most commonly case management, multidisciplinary meetings and staff specialist involvement. Lack of co-ordination between services and a lack of resources in ED were cited as barriers to improving outcomes for patients who frequently present. Conclusions ED clinicians surveyed offered suggestions on how to characterise frequent ED presentations beyond the number of visits to better identify this higher risk population. Additional services, as well as better coordination between patients, families, hospitals and outpatient services, appear needed in order to improve outcomes for this cohort of patients. Interventions should focus on increasing health outcomes, rather than a decrease in the number of presentations alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":"47 2","pages":"226-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess emergency clinician perceptions of adult patients who present frequently to the emergency department (ED) in an Australian context and understand current practices. Methods ED clinicians including general practitioners, career medical officers and nurse unit managers working at New South Wales Australia level 3-6 hospitals were surveyed. Responses to open-ended questions were independently coded by two reviewers and the main themes were analysed. Results Almost all the 210 participants (99%) could identify a population of frequent ED presenters at their hospital. Participants suggested that 9-12 presentations per year was a useful benchmark to use to characterise frequent ED presentations. They also indicated the need to consider as criteria recurrent presentations, their complexity, disease category and timeframe. Participants believed that the cause for presentation, from a restricted list of clinical alternatives, was multifactorial but the single most common cause for presentation was thought to be mental health followed by drug and alcohol. A total of 73% of participants reported that their hospitals had interventions to address frequent ED presentations, most commonly case management, multidisciplinary meetings and staff specialist involvement. Lack of co-ordination between services and a lack of resources in ED were cited as barriers to improving outcomes for patients who frequently present. Conclusions ED clinicians surveyed offered suggestions on how to characterise frequent ED presentations beyond the number of visits to better identify this higher risk population. Additional services, as well as better coordination between patients, families, hospitals and outpatient services, appear needed in order to improve outcomes for this cohort of patients. Interventions should focus on increasing health outcomes, rather than a decrease in the number of presentations alone.

急诊临床医生对经常出现在急诊科的患者的看法:当前实践的快照。
目的本研究旨在评估急诊临床医生对澳大利亚急诊科(ED)频繁出现的成年患者的看法,并了解当前的做法。方法对澳大利亚新南威尔士州3-6级医院的全科医生、职业医务人员和护理单位经理等急诊科临床医生进行调查。对开放式问题的回答由两位审稿人独立编码,并对主要主题进行分析。结果:几乎所有210名参与者(99%)都能识别出他们所在医院经常出现急诊科医生的人群。与会者建议,每年9-12次演讲是一个有用的基准,用于描述频繁的ED演讲。他们还指出,需要将复发症状、其复杂性、疾病类别和时间框架作为考虑标准。与会者认为,从有限的临床替代方案清单来看,出现症状的原因是多因素的,但最常见的一个原因被认为是精神健康,其次是药物和酒精。共有73%的参与者报告说,他们的医院有干预措施来解决频繁的急诊科报告、最常见的病例管理、多学科会议和工作人员的专家参与。缺乏服务之间的协调和缺乏资源的急诊科被认为是改善患者频繁出现的结果的障碍。结论:接受调查的ED临床医生提供了关于如何确定频繁ED表现的建议,以更好地识别这一高危人群。似乎需要更多的服务,以及患者、家庭、医院和门诊服务之间更好的协调,以改善这批患者的预后。干预措施应侧重于增加健康结果,而不仅仅是减少介绍次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信