Analysis of failed mechanical thrombectomy with a focus on technical reasons: Ten years of experience in a single institution.

Sinho Park, Dong Hoon Lee, Jae Hoon Sung, Seung Yoon Song
{"title":"Analysis of failed mechanical thrombectomy with a focus on technical reasons: Ten years of experience in a single institution.","authors":"Sinho Park,&nbsp;Dong Hoon Lee,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Sung,&nbsp;Seung Yoon Song","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2022.E2022.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. However, recanalization failure rates of interventions were about 20% in literature studies. We report our experience of unsuccessful MT with a focus on technical reasons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2010 to June 2021, six hundred eight patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion received MT using a stent retriever with or without an aspiration catheter in our institution. We divided the reasons for failure into six categories. We analyzed the reasons for failure by dividing our experience time into 3 periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 608 cases of thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion were identified in the study period. The successful recanalization rate was 90.4%. In most of the cases (20/57, 35%), the thrombus persisted despite several passes, and the second most common cause was termination of the procedure even after partial recanalization (10/57, 18%). Similar proportions of in-stent occlusion, distal embolization, and termination due to vessel rupture were observed. On analysis of three periods, the successful recanalization rate improved over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MT fails due to various reasons, and intracranial artery stenosis is the main cause of MT failure. With the development of rescue techniques, the failure rate has gradually decreased. Further development of new devices and techniques could improve the recanalization rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"13-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0a/bc/jcen-2022-e2022-08-002.PMC10073775.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2022.E2022.08.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. However, recanalization failure rates of interventions were about 20% in literature studies. We report our experience of unsuccessful MT with a focus on technical reasons.

Methods: From December 2010 to June 2021, six hundred eight patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion received MT using a stent retriever with or without an aspiration catheter in our institution. We divided the reasons for failure into six categories. We analyzed the reasons for failure by dividing our experience time into 3 periods.

Results: A total of 608 cases of thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion were identified in the study period. The successful recanalization rate was 90.4%. In most of the cases (20/57, 35%), the thrombus persisted despite several passes, and the second most common cause was termination of the procedure even after partial recanalization (10/57, 18%). Similar proportions of in-stent occlusion, distal embolization, and termination due to vessel rupture were observed. On analysis of three periods, the successful recanalization rate improved over time.

Conclusions: MT fails due to various reasons, and intracranial artery stenosis is the main cause of MT failure. With the development of rescue techniques, the failure rate has gradually decreased. Further development of new devices and techniques could improve the recanalization rates.

Abstract Image

机械取栓失败的技术原因分析:同一机构10年经验。
目的:机械取栓是治疗急性缺血性脑卒中并发大血管闭塞的有效方法。然而,在文献研究中,干预措施再通失败率约为20%。我们报告MT失败的经验,重点是技术原因。方法:2010年12月至2021年6月,我院698例大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者采用支架取物器加或不加抽吸导管接受MT治疗。我们把失败的原因分为六类。我们将我们的体验时间分为三个阶段来分析失败的原因。结果:研究期间共发现608例大血管闭塞取栓术。再通成功率为90.4%。在大多数情况下(20/ 57,35%),尽管多次通过,血栓仍然存在,第二个最常见的原因是即使部分再通后手术终止(10/ 57,18%)。观察到支架内闭塞、远端栓塞和因血管破裂而终止的比例相似。通过对三个阶段的分析,再通成功率随着时间的推移而提高。结论:MT失败的原因多种多样,颅内动脉狭窄是导致MT失败的主要原因。随着救援技术的发展,其故障率逐渐降低。新装置和新技术的进一步发展可以提高再通率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信