Effect of Mastectomy Flap Fixation on Post-operative Fluid Drainage and Seroma Formation in Breast Cancer Patients A Double-blinded Randomised Control Trial.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Parikshith Parikshith Manjunath, Raghav Yelamanchi, Himanshu Agrawal, Ekta Ekta Yadav, Nikhil Gupta, Arun Kumar Gupta, C Durga
{"title":"Effect of Mastectomy Flap Fixation on Post-operative Fluid Drainage and Seroma Formation in Breast Cancer Patients A Double-blinded Randomised Control Trial.","authors":"Parikshith Parikshith Manjunath,&nbsp;Raghav Yelamanchi,&nbsp;Himanshu Agrawal,&nbsp;Ekta Ekta Yadav,&nbsp;Nikhil Gupta,&nbsp;Arun Kumar Gupta,&nbsp;C Durga","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.8569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt; Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Post-operative seroma formation is one of the most common complications following modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Quilting is a technique where the mastectomy flaps are sutured to the underlying chest wall muscles with sutures, obliterating the dead space. The authors hypothesised that post-mastectomy dead space obliteration by intermittent mastectomy flap fixation leads to decreased drain output and seroma formation. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt; Material and methods: &lt;/b&gt; A double-blinded randomised control trial with two arms was conducted from November 2019 to March 2021 in our institute located in India. Patients with non metastatic breast carcinoma planned for MRM were randomly categorised into two groups of 35 patients each. In the test group, each flap was fixed to the underlying muscle using four intermittent 3-0 polyglactin sutures, which was followed by skin closure, and only skin closure was done in the control group. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; The test and control groups did not differ significantly with respect to demographic and tumour characteristics. The average drain output of the test group (155.43 ml) was significantly less than of the control group (206.29 ml). The overall incidence of seroma formation is lower in the test group (5.7%) when compared to the control group (28.6%). The duration of hospital stay in the test group (4.63 days) was significantly shorter when compared to the control group (6.66 days). There was no significant increase in the overall operating time or complications like surgical site infection or skin dimpling due to flap fixation. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Fixation of MRM flaps is associated with better post-operative outcomes related to drain output and seroma formation without a significant increase in other morbidities or usage of resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<b> Introduction:</b> Post-operative seroma formation is one of the most common complications following modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Quilting is a technique where the mastectomy flaps are sutured to the underlying chest wall muscles with sutures, obliterating the dead space. The authors hypothesised that post-mastectomy dead space obliteration by intermittent mastectomy flap fixation leads to decreased drain output and seroma formation. </br></br> <b> Material and methods: </b> A double-blinded randomised control trial with two arms was conducted from November 2019 to March 2021 in our institute located in India. Patients with non metastatic breast carcinoma planned for MRM were randomly categorised into two groups of 35 patients each. In the test group, each flap was fixed to the underlying muscle using four intermittent 3-0 polyglactin sutures, which was followed by skin closure, and only skin closure was done in the control group. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> The test and control groups did not differ significantly with respect to demographic and tumour characteristics. The average drain output of the test group (155.43 ml) was significantly less than of the control group (206.29 ml). The overall incidence of seroma formation is lower in the test group (5.7%) when compared to the control group (28.6%). The duration of hospital stay in the test group (4.63 days) was significantly shorter when compared to the control group (6.66 days). There was no significant increase in the overall operating time or complications like surgical site infection or skin dimpling due to flap fixation. </br></br> <b>Conclusions:</b> Fixation of MRM flaps is associated with better post-operative outcomes related to drain output and seroma formation without a significant increase in other morbidities or usage of resources.

乳房切除术皮瓣固定对乳腺癌患者术后液体引流和血清肿形成的影响:双盲随机对照试验。
& lt; b>作品简介:& lt; / b>术后血清肿形成是改良乳房根治术(MRM)后最常见的并发症之一。绗缝是一种将乳房切除术皮瓣用缝合线缝合到胸壁下的肌肉上,以消除死亡空间的技术。作者假设,乳房切除术后的死腔封闭,间歇性乳房切除术皮瓣固定导致引流液输出减少和血清形成。& lt; / br> & lt; / br>& lt; b>材料和方法:</b>2019年11月至2021年3月,在我们位于印度的研究所进行了一项双盲随机对照试验。计划行MRM的非转移性乳腺癌患者随机分为两组,每组35例。试验组采用4条3-0聚乳酸间歇缝合线将皮瓣固定于下下层肌肉,然后闭合皮肤,对照组只闭合皮肤。& lt; / br> & lt; / br>& lt; b>结果:& lt; / b>试验组和对照组在人口统计学和肿瘤特征方面没有显著差异。实验组平均排液量(155.43 ml)明显低于对照组(206.29 ml)。试验组血清形成的总体发生率(5.7%)低于对照组(28.6%)。实验组住院时间(4.63天)明显短于对照组(6.66天)。总的手术时间和手术部位感染、皮瓣固定引起的皮肤凹陷等并发症均无明显增加。& lt; / br> & lt; / br>& lt; b>结论:& lt; / b>MRM皮瓣的固定与引流液输出和血清形成相关的更好的术后结果相关,而不会显著增加其他发病率或资源的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信