Prevalence of Nomophobia in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 Q3 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Kimberly G Tuco, Sharong D Castro-Diaz, David R Soriano-Moreno, Vicente A Benites-Zapata
{"title":"Prevalence of Nomophobia in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Kimberly G Tuco,&nbsp;Sharong D Castro-Diaz,&nbsp;David R Soriano-Moreno,&nbsp;Vicente A Benites-Zapata","doi":"10.4258/hir.2023.29.1.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of nomophobia in university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted of the following databases: Web of Science/ Core Collection, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Ovid/ MEDLINE until March 2021. Cross-sectional studies reporting the prevalence of nomophobia in undergraduate or postgraduate university students that assessed nomophobia with the 20-item Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q) tool were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using sensitivity analysis according to the risk of bias, and subgrouping by country, sex, and major.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 28 cross-sectional studies with a total of 11,300 participants from eight countries, of which 23 were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of mild nomophobia was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20%-28%; I2 = 95.3%), that of moderate nomophobia was 56% (95% CI, 53%-60%; I2 = 91.2%), and that of severe nomophobia was 17% (95% CI, 15%-20%; I2 = 91.7%). Regarding countries, Indonesia had the highest prevalence of severe nomophobia (71%) and Germany had the lowest (3%). The prevalence was similar according to sex and major.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a high prevalence of moderate and severe nomophobia in university students. Interventions are needed to prevent and treat this problem in educational institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12947,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Informatics Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/16/hir-2023-29-1-40.PMC9932304.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Informatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2023.29.1.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of nomophobia in university students.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted of the following databases: Web of Science/ Core Collection, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Ovid/ MEDLINE until March 2021. Cross-sectional studies reporting the prevalence of nomophobia in undergraduate or postgraduate university students that assessed nomophobia with the 20-item Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q) tool were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using sensitivity analysis according to the risk of bias, and subgrouping by country, sex, and major.

Results: We included 28 cross-sectional studies with a total of 11,300 participants from eight countries, of which 23 were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of mild nomophobia was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20%-28%; I2 = 95.3%), that of moderate nomophobia was 56% (95% CI, 53%-60%; I2 = 91.2%), and that of severe nomophobia was 17% (95% CI, 15%-20%; I2 = 91.7%). Regarding countries, Indonesia had the highest prevalence of severe nomophobia (71%) and Germany had the lowest (3%). The prevalence was similar according to sex and major.

Conclusions: We found a high prevalence of moderate and severe nomophobia in university students. Interventions are needed to prevent and treat this problem in educational institutions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大学生无手机恐惧症的流行:系统回顾与元分析。
目的:本研究的目的是评估大学生无手机恐惧症的患病率。方法:系统检索以下数据库:Web of Science/ Core Collection、Scopus、PubMed、Embase和Ovid/ MEDLINE,检索截止日期为2021年3月。横断面研究报告了大学生或研究生中无恐惧症的患病率,这些研究使用20项无恐惧症问卷(NMP-Q)工具评估了无恐惧症。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估一式两份。采用随机效应模型对比例进行meta分析。根据偏倚风险,并按国家、性别和专业进行亚分组,采用敏感性分析评估异质性。结果:我们纳入了28项横断面研究,共有来自8个国家的11,300名参与者,其中23项纳入了meta分析。轻度无手机恐惧症的患病率为24%(95%可信区间[CI], 20%-28%;I2 = 95.3%),中度无恐惧症为56% (95% CI, 53%-60%;I2 = 91.2%),重度无手机恐惧症为17% (95% CI, 15%-20%;I2 = 91.7%)。就国家而言,印度尼西亚的严重无恐惧症患病率最高(71%),德国最低(3%)。不同性别和专业的患病率相似。结论:我们发现大学生中中度和重度无手机恐惧症的患病率很高。需要采取干预措施来预防和治疗教育机构中的这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Informatics Research
Healthcare Informatics Research MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信