What Is the Impact of Lockdowns on Dengue?

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Oliver Brady, Annelies Wilder-Smith
{"title":"What Is the Impact of Lockdowns on Dengue?","authors":"Oliver Brady,&nbsp;Annelies Wilder-Smith","doi":"10.1007/s11908-020-00744-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Societal lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have led to unprecedented disruption to daily life across the globe. A collateral effect of these lockdowns may be a change to transmission dynamics of a wide range of infectious diseases that are all highly dependent on rates of contact between humans. With timing, duration and intensity of lockdowns varying country-to-country, the wave of lockdowns in 2020 present a unique opportunity to observe how changes in human contact rates, disease control and surveillance affect dengue virus transmission in a global natural experiment. We explore the theoretical basis for the impact of lockdowns on dengue transmission and surveillance then summarise the current evidence base from country reports.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We find considerable variation in the intensity of dengue epidemics reported so far in 2020 with some countries experiencing historic low levels of transmission while others are seeing record outbreaks. Despite many studies warning of the risks of lockdown for dengue transmission, few empirically quantify the impact and issues such as the specific timing of the lockdowns and multi-annual cycles of dengue are not accounted for. In the few studies where such issues have been accounted for, the impact of lockdowns on dengue appears to be limited.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Studying the impact of lockdowns on dengue transmission is important both in how we deal with the immediate COVID-19 and dengue crisis, but also over the coming years in the post-pandemic recovery period. It is clear lockdowns have had very different impacts in different settings. Further analyses might ultimately allow this unique natural experiment to provide insights into how to better control dengue that will ultimately lead to better long-term control.</p>","PeriodicalId":48839,"journal":{"name":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11908-020-00744-9","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-020-00744-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Purpose of review: Societal lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have led to unprecedented disruption to daily life across the globe. A collateral effect of these lockdowns may be a change to transmission dynamics of a wide range of infectious diseases that are all highly dependent on rates of contact between humans. With timing, duration and intensity of lockdowns varying country-to-country, the wave of lockdowns in 2020 present a unique opportunity to observe how changes in human contact rates, disease control and surveillance affect dengue virus transmission in a global natural experiment. We explore the theoretical basis for the impact of lockdowns on dengue transmission and surveillance then summarise the current evidence base from country reports.

Recent findings: We find considerable variation in the intensity of dengue epidemics reported so far in 2020 with some countries experiencing historic low levels of transmission while others are seeing record outbreaks. Despite many studies warning of the risks of lockdown for dengue transmission, few empirically quantify the impact and issues such as the specific timing of the lockdowns and multi-annual cycles of dengue are not accounted for. In the few studies where such issues have been accounted for, the impact of lockdowns on dengue appears to be limited.

Summary: Studying the impact of lockdowns on dengue transmission is important both in how we deal with the immediate COVID-19 and dengue crisis, but also over the coming years in the post-pandemic recovery period. It is clear lockdowns have had very different impacts in different settings. Further analyses might ultimately allow this unique natural experiment to provide insights into how to better control dengue that will ultimately lead to better long-term control.

封锁对登革热有什么影响?
审查目的:为应对COVID-19大流行而实施的社会封锁,给全球日常生活带来了前所未有的中断。这些封锁的附带影响可能是一系列传染病的传播动态发生变化,这些传染病都高度依赖于人与人之间的接触率。由于各国封锁的时间、持续时间和强度各不相同,2020年的封锁浪潮提供了一个独特的机会,可以在全球自然实验中观察人类接触率、疾病控制和监测方面的变化如何影响登革热病毒传播。我们探讨了封锁对登革热传播和监测影响的理论基础,然后总结了目前来自国家报告的证据基础。最近的发现:我们发现,到目前为止,2020年报告的登革热流行强度差异很大,一些国家的传播水平处于历史低位,而另一些国家则出现了创纪录的疫情。尽管许多研究警告了封锁对登革热传播的风险,但很少有实证量化其影响,并且没有考虑到封锁的具体时间和登革热的多年周期等问题。在少数考虑到这些问题的研究中,封锁对登革热的影响似乎有限。总结:研究封锁对登革热传播的影响,不仅对我们如何应对当前的COVID-19和登革热危机很重要,而且对未来几年大流行后的恢复期也很重要。很明显,封锁在不同的环境中产生了非常不同的影响。进一步的分析可能最终使这一独特的自然实验为如何更好地控制登革热提供见解,从而最终实现更好的长期控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Infectious Disease Reports
Current Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of infectious disease. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, tropical and travel medicine, and urinary tract infections. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信