Consistency of Graph Theoretical Measurements of Alzheimer's Disease Fiber Density Connectomes Across Multiple Parcellation Scales.

Frederick Xu, Sumita Garai, Duy Duong-Tran, Andrew J Saykin, Yize Zhao, Li Shen
{"title":"Consistency of Graph Theoretical Measurements of Alzheimer's Disease Fiber Density Connectomes Across Multiple Parcellation Scales.","authors":"Frederick Xu, Sumita Garai, Duy Duong-Tran, Andrew J Saykin, Yize Zhao, Li Shen","doi":"10.1109/bibm55620.2022.9995657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Graph theoretical measures have frequently been used to study disrupted connectivity in Alzheimer's disease human brain connectomes. However, prior studies have noted that differences in graph creation methods are confounding factors that may alter the topological observations found in these measures. In this study, we conduct a novel investigation regarding the effect of parcellation scale on graph theoretical measures computed for fiber density networks derived from diffusion tensor imaging. We computed 4 network-wide graph theoretical measures of average clustering coefficient, transitivity, characteristic path length, and global efficiency, and we tested whether these measures are able to consistently identify group differences among healthy control (HC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD groups in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort across 5 scales of the Lausanne parcellation. We found that the segregative measure of transtivity offered the greatest consistency across scales in distinguishing between healthy and diseased groups, while the other measures were impacted by the selection of scale to varying degrees. Global efficiency was the second most consistent measure that we tested, where the measure could distinguish between HC and MCI in all 5 scales and between HC and AD in 3 out of 5 scales. Characteristic path length was highly sensitive to the variation in scale, corroborating previous findings, and could not identify group differences in many of the scales. Average clustering coefficient was also greatly impacted by scale, as it consistently failed to identify group differences in the higher resolution parcellations. From these results, we conclude that many graph theoretical measures are sensitive to the selection of parcellation scale, and further development in methodology is needed to offer a more robust characterization of AD's relationship with disrupted connectivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":74563,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","volume":"2022 ","pages":"1323-1328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082965/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/bibm55620.2022.9995657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Graph theoretical measures have frequently been used to study disrupted connectivity in Alzheimer's disease human brain connectomes. However, prior studies have noted that differences in graph creation methods are confounding factors that may alter the topological observations found in these measures. In this study, we conduct a novel investigation regarding the effect of parcellation scale on graph theoretical measures computed for fiber density networks derived from diffusion tensor imaging. We computed 4 network-wide graph theoretical measures of average clustering coefficient, transitivity, characteristic path length, and global efficiency, and we tested whether these measures are able to consistently identify group differences among healthy control (HC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD groups in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort across 5 scales of the Lausanne parcellation. We found that the segregative measure of transtivity offered the greatest consistency across scales in distinguishing between healthy and diseased groups, while the other measures were impacted by the selection of scale to varying degrees. Global efficiency was the second most consistent measure that we tested, where the measure could distinguish between HC and MCI in all 5 scales and between HC and AD in 3 out of 5 scales. Characteristic path length was highly sensitive to the variation in scale, corroborating previous findings, and could not identify group differences in many of the scales. Average clustering coefficient was also greatly impacted by scale, as it consistently failed to identify group differences in the higher resolution parcellations. From these results, we conclude that many graph theoretical measures are sensitive to the selection of parcellation scale, and further development in methodology is needed to offer a more robust characterization of AD's relationship with disrupted connectivity.

阿尔茨海默氏症纤维密度连接组的图形理论测量在多个分割尺度上的一致性。
图论测量方法经常被用于研究阿尔茨海默病人脑连接组中的连接中断。然而,之前的研究指出,图形创建方法的差异是可能改变这些测量中发现的拓扑观察结果的干扰因素。在本研究中,我们进行了一项新颖的调查,研究解析尺度对从扩散张量成像中得出的纤维密度网络计算出的图论测量结果的影响。我们计算了平均聚类系数、传递性、特征路径长度和全局效率这4个网络范围的图论测量值,并测试了这些测量值是否能在洛桑解析法的5个尺度上持续识别阿尔茨海默病神经影像倡议(ADNI)队列中健康对照组(HC)、轻度认知障碍组(MCI)和AD组之间的组别差异。我们发现,在区分健康组和患病组时,"转折性 "这一分离性测量方法在不同量表之间具有最大的一致性,而其他测量方法在不同程度上受到量表选择的影响。全局效率是我们测试过的第二种最一致的测量方法,该方法在所有 5 个量表中都能区分 HC 和 MCI,在 5 个量表中的 3 个量表中能区分 HC 和 AD。特征路径长度对量表的变化高度敏感,这与之前的研究结果相吻合,而且在许多量表中无法识别群体差异。平均聚类系数也受到量表的很大影响,因为它始终无法识别分辨率较高的小块中的组别差异。从这些结果中,我们得出结论:许多图论测量对选择解析尺度很敏感,因此需要进一步发展方法论,以更可靠地描述注意力缺失症与连接中断之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信