Evaluation of Computer-Based Insulin Infusion Algorithm Compared With a Paper-Based Protocol in the Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1177/87551225231160050
Heather M Martinez, Kirsten Elwood, Chris Werth, Preeyaporn Sarangarm
{"title":"Evaluation of Computer-Based Insulin Infusion Algorithm Compared With a Paper-Based Protocol in the Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.","authors":"Heather M Martinez, Kirsten Elwood, Chris Werth, Preeyaporn Sarangarm","doi":"10.1177/87551225231160050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Development of computer-based software, termed electronic glucose management system (eGMS), offers an alternative strategy to manage diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) compared with institution-specific paper protocols by integrating glucose and insulin titration into the electronic medical record. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the safety and efficacy of eGMS versus a paper-based DKA protocol in an urban academic medical center. <b>Methods:</b> Single-center, retrospective analysis of patients admitted for DKA. The primary objective of this study was the time to transition from intravenous to subcutaneous insulin after resolution of DKA pre- and post-eGMS implementation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of hypoglycemia while on an insulin infusion, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and total hospital length of stay. <b>Results:</b> Time to DKA resolution was similar in both groups with a median time of 8.6 versus 8.8 hours in the paper-based (n = 133) and eGMS groups (n = 84), respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.43). Hypoglycemia occurred more frequently in the paper-based group compared with eGMS during insulin infusion (14 vs 3 patients, <i>P</i> = 0.06). The median ICU (36.5 vs 41.4 hours; <i>P</i> = 0.05) and hospital length of stay (67.9 vs 77.8 hours; <i>P</i> = 0.05) were shorter in the paper-based group compared with the eGMS group. <b>Conclusion and Relevance</b>: Similar rates of DKA resolution were seen for patients managed with a paper-based protocol compared with eGMS. Patients in the paper-based protocol had a shorter ICU and hospital length of stay; however, eGMS had improved clinically relevant safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231160050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Development of computer-based software, termed electronic glucose management system (eGMS), offers an alternative strategy to manage diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) compared with institution-specific paper protocols by integrating glucose and insulin titration into the electronic medical record. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of eGMS versus a paper-based DKA protocol in an urban academic medical center. Methods: Single-center, retrospective analysis of patients admitted for DKA. The primary objective of this study was the time to transition from intravenous to subcutaneous insulin after resolution of DKA pre- and post-eGMS implementation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of hypoglycemia while on an insulin infusion, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and total hospital length of stay. Results: Time to DKA resolution was similar in both groups with a median time of 8.6 versus 8.8 hours in the paper-based (n = 133) and eGMS groups (n = 84), respectively (P = 0.43). Hypoglycemia occurred more frequently in the paper-based group compared with eGMS during insulin infusion (14 vs 3 patients, P = 0.06). The median ICU (36.5 vs 41.4 hours; P = 0.05) and hospital length of stay (67.9 vs 77.8 hours; P = 0.05) were shorter in the paper-based group compared with the eGMS group. Conclusion and Relevance: Similar rates of DKA resolution were seen for patients managed with a paper-based protocol compared with eGMS. Patients in the paper-based protocol had a shorter ICU and hospital length of stay; however, eGMS had improved clinically relevant safety outcomes.

评估基于计算机的胰岛素输注算法与基于纸张的方案在治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒中的效果。
背景:通过将血糖和胰岛素滴定整合到电子病历中,基于计算机的软件(称为电子血糖管理系统(eGMS))的开发为糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的管理提供了一种与特定机构的纸质方案相比的替代策略。目的在城市学术医疗中心评估 eGMS 与纸质 DKA 方案的安全性和有效性。方法: 单中心、回顾性分析对因 DKA 入院的患者进行单中心回顾性分析。本研究的首要目标是实施 eGMS 前后 DKA 缓解后从静脉注射胰岛素过渡到皮下注射胰岛素的时间。次要结果包括胰岛素输注期间的低血糖发生率、重症监护室(ICU)住院时间和总住院时间。结果两组患者的 DKA 缓解时间相似,纸质组(n = 133)和 eGMS 组(n = 84)的中位时间分别为 8.6 小时和 8.8 小时(P = 0.43)。与 eGMS 相比,纸质组在输注胰岛素期间发生低血糖的频率更高(14 对 3 例患者,P = 0.06)。与 eGMS 组相比,纸质组的重症监护室中位时间(36.5 小时 vs 41.4 小时;P = 0.05)和住院时间(67.9 小时 vs 77.8 小时;P = 0.05)更短。结论与意义:与电子血糖管理系统相比,采用纸质方案管理的患者DKA缓解率相似。采用纸质方案的患者在重症监护室和医院的住院时间更短;但是,eGMS 在临床相关的安全性方面有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信