Use of Marijuana to Promote Well-Being: Effects of Use and Prohibition in the Daily Lives of Brazilian Adults.

IF 2 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Luciana Togni de Lima E Silva Surjus, Natália Cavalcante Dainesi, Felipe Granado de Souza
{"title":"Use of Marijuana to Promote Well-Being: Effects of Use and Prohibition in the Daily Lives of Brazilian Adults.","authors":"Luciana Togni de Lima E Silva Surjus,&nbsp;Natália Cavalcante Dainesi,&nbsp;Felipe Granado de Souza","doi":"10.1177/11782218231162469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug worldwide. From an occupational perspective, its use is paradoxical in that although it can be harmful to health and has criminal consequences, it can also promote well-being. This study examined predictors of well-being to determine the effects of marijuana use and its prohibition on the daily lives of Brazilian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online questionnaire with a final sample of 2637 respondents. Utilizing logistic regression, variables were selected pertaining to use and prohibition risks, benefits of use, and harm reduction associated with the socioeconomic characteristics of the respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using marijuana for fun was most likely among those self-identified as male, trans/non-binary people, college graduates, and those with higher incomes. Living with family members and using less frequently proved to be protective against the adverse effect of \"getting high.\" Indigenous peoples and youth were more likely to report trouble with the police due to marijuana use; individuals with higher education and longer use of marijuana reported more frequent use of harm reduction strategies; people who identified their color as yellow were more likely to report daily use compared to people who identified their color as white; women and people with higher income were less likely to report daily use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social class, race, gender, and generation were predictors of well-being associated with marijuana use and its prohibition, indicating an interaction between different dimensions involving the use of illicit substances. Identifying the effects of the use and prohibition of marijuana in promoting well-being, from the conception of drug use as a non-sanctioned occupation, can broaden the understanding of this complex human phenomenon, with health and criminal repercussions, subsidizing the development of approaches more equitable and adequate into occupational therapy to reduce personal and social harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":22185,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","volume":"17 ","pages":"11782218231162469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/74/10.1177_11782218231162469.PMC10084564.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231162469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug worldwide. From an occupational perspective, its use is paradoxical in that although it can be harmful to health and has criminal consequences, it can also promote well-being. This study examined predictors of well-being to determine the effects of marijuana use and its prohibition on the daily lives of Brazilian adults.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online questionnaire with a final sample of 2637 respondents. Utilizing logistic regression, variables were selected pertaining to use and prohibition risks, benefits of use, and harm reduction associated with the socioeconomic characteristics of the respondents.

Results: Using marijuana for fun was most likely among those self-identified as male, trans/non-binary people, college graduates, and those with higher incomes. Living with family members and using less frequently proved to be protective against the adverse effect of "getting high." Indigenous peoples and youth were more likely to report trouble with the police due to marijuana use; individuals with higher education and longer use of marijuana reported more frequent use of harm reduction strategies; people who identified their color as yellow were more likely to report daily use compared to people who identified their color as white; women and people with higher income were less likely to report daily use.

Conclusions: Social class, race, gender, and generation were predictors of well-being associated with marijuana use and its prohibition, indicating an interaction between different dimensions involving the use of illicit substances. Identifying the effects of the use and prohibition of marijuana in promoting well-being, from the conception of drug use as a non-sanctioned occupation, can broaden the understanding of this complex human phenomenon, with health and criminal repercussions, subsidizing the development of approaches more equitable and adequate into occupational therapy to reduce personal and social harm.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用大麻促进健康:巴西成年人日常生活中使用和禁止的影响。
背景:大麻是世界上使用最广泛的非法药物。从职业角度来看,它的使用是自相矛盾的,因为尽管它可能有害健康并具有犯罪后果,但它也可以促进福祉。这项研究检查了健康的预测因素,以确定大麻使用和禁止对巴西成年人日常生活的影响。方法:本横断面研究采用匿名在线问卷,最终样本为2637人。利用逻辑回归,选择与使用和禁止风险有关的变量,使用的好处,以及与受访者的社会经济特征相关的危害减少。结果:在自认为是男性、跨性别/非二元性别者、大学毕业生和高收入人群中,吸食大麻取乐的可能性最大。事实证明,与家人住在一起,减少使用频率,可以防止“嗑药”带来的负面影响。土著居民和年轻人更有可能因吸食大麻而向警方报案;受过高等教育和长期使用大麻的个体报告更频繁地使用减少危害策略;认为自己颜色是黄色的人比认为自己颜色是白色的人更有可能报告日常使用;女性和高收入人群报告每日使用大麻的可能性较小。结论:社会阶层、种族、性别和世代是与大麻使用和禁止相关的幸福感的预测因素,表明涉及非法物质使用的不同维度之间存在相互作用。从吸毒作为一种不受制裁的职业的概念来确定使用和禁止大麻在促进福祉方面的影响,可以扩大对这一具有健康和刑事影响的复杂人类现象的理解,资助制定更公平和适当的职业治疗办法,以减少个人和社会伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信