Treatment Patterns of Follicular Lymphoma in the United States: A Claims Analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2022-10-24 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.38070
Scott F Huntington, Sreevalsa Appukkuttan, Wenyi Wang, Yuxian Du, Sari Hopson, Svetlana Babajanyan
{"title":"Treatment Patterns of Follicular Lymphoma in the United States: A Claims Analysis.","authors":"Scott F Huntington, Sreevalsa Appukkuttan, Wenyi Wang, Yuxian Du, Sari Hopson, Svetlana Babajanyan","doi":"10.36469/001c.38070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A consensus is lacking on optimal treatment sequencing for follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common indolent lymphoma. FL is incurable, and many patients require multiple lines of therapy for successive relapses. Guidelines provide numerous recommendations for first-, second-, and third-line therapy; however, treatment patterns in the real world remain poorly understood. <b>Objectives:</b> The primary objective of this study is to evaluate real-world treatment patterns among commercially insured patients with FL in the United States. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort of patients with newly diagnosed FL was identified from June 2008 to September 2016 using the IBM MarketScan® database. Treatment pattern measures, including time to treatment from diagnosis, days from previous line of therapy, duration of therapy, and distribution of treatment regimens among lines of therapy, were assessed. Descriptive statistics were reported for baseline characteristics, primary outcome, and treatment pattern measures. <b>Results:</b> In total, 4232 patients were identified from the database and 2111 patients received at least 1 line of treatment. The most common first-line treatments included bendamustine + rituximab (39%), rituximab + cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine (20%), and rituximab monotherapy (19%). Rituximab monotherapy was the most common second-line (34%) and third or greater line (57%) treatment. The median time from FL diagnosis to initiation of treatment was 50 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 28-191) for first-line treatment, 577 days (IQR: 312-1146) for second-line, and 776 days (IQR: 603-1290) for third-line. <b>Discussion:</b> At a median follow-up of 3.6 years, most patients had 1 or fewer lines of therapy. The use of combination therapy decreased with each line of therapy and the numbers of patients receiving third- or fourth-line therapy were small in this study, potentially due to the short follow-up. Rituximab as monotherapy or in combination was utilized most frequently; however, the variety of other therapies used demonstrates that the standard management of FL remains unclear. <b>Conclusions:</b> Consensus on optimal treatment sequencing is currently lacking, and patients receive a variety of active regimens during routine practice. In this contemporary cohort of patients diagnosed with FL in the United States, rituximab therapy predominated both in monotherapy and in combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"9 2","pages":"115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.38070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A consensus is lacking on optimal treatment sequencing for follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common indolent lymphoma. FL is incurable, and many patients require multiple lines of therapy for successive relapses. Guidelines provide numerous recommendations for first-, second-, and third-line therapy; however, treatment patterns in the real world remain poorly understood. Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate real-world treatment patterns among commercially insured patients with FL in the United States. Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients with newly diagnosed FL was identified from June 2008 to September 2016 using the IBM MarketScan® database. Treatment pattern measures, including time to treatment from diagnosis, days from previous line of therapy, duration of therapy, and distribution of treatment regimens among lines of therapy, were assessed. Descriptive statistics were reported for baseline characteristics, primary outcome, and treatment pattern measures. Results: In total, 4232 patients were identified from the database and 2111 patients received at least 1 line of treatment. The most common first-line treatments included bendamustine + rituximab (39%), rituximab + cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine (20%), and rituximab monotherapy (19%). Rituximab monotherapy was the most common second-line (34%) and third or greater line (57%) treatment. The median time from FL diagnosis to initiation of treatment was 50 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 28-191) for first-line treatment, 577 days (IQR: 312-1146) for second-line, and 776 days (IQR: 603-1290) for third-line. Discussion: At a median follow-up of 3.6 years, most patients had 1 or fewer lines of therapy. The use of combination therapy decreased with each line of therapy and the numbers of patients receiving third- or fourth-line therapy were small in this study, potentially due to the short follow-up. Rituximab as monotherapy or in combination was utilized most frequently; however, the variety of other therapies used demonstrates that the standard management of FL remains unclear. Conclusions: Consensus on optimal treatment sequencing is currently lacking, and patients receive a variety of active regimens during routine practice. In this contemporary cohort of patients diagnosed with FL in the United States, rituximab therapy predominated both in monotherapy and in combination.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

美国滤泡淋巴瘤的治疗模式:索赔分析。
背景:滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)是最常见的非淋巴性淋巴瘤,目前尚未就滤泡性淋巴瘤的最佳治疗顺序达成共识。滤泡性淋巴瘤无法治愈,许多患者在连续复发后需要接受多线治疗。指南为一线、二线和三线治疗提供了大量建议;然而,人们对现实世界中的治疗模式仍然知之甚少。研究目的本研究的主要目的是评估美国商业保险 FL 患者的实际治疗模式。方法:使用 IBM MarketScan® 数据库对 2008 年 6 月至 2016 年 9 月期间新确诊的 FL 患者进行回顾性队列识别。对治疗模式进行了评估,包括从诊断到治疗的时间、上一疗程的治疗天数、治疗持续时间以及各疗程治疗方案的分布情况。报告了基线特征、主要结果和治疗模式指标的描述性统计。结果数据库中共识别出 4232 名患者,其中 2111 名患者接受了至少一种治疗方案。最常见的一线治疗包括苯达莫司汀+利妥昔单抗(39%)、利妥昔单抗+环磷酰胺+多柔比星+长春新碱(20%)和利妥昔单抗单药治疗(19%)。利妥昔单抗是最常见的二线治疗(34%)和三线或三线以上治疗(57%)。从 FL 诊断到开始治疗的中位时间为:一线治疗 50 天(四分位间距 [IQR]:28-191),二线治疗 577 天(四分位间距 [IQR]:312-1146),三线治疗 776 天(四分位间距 [IQR]:603-1290)。讨论结果在中位 3.6 年的随访中,大多数患者接受了 1 种或更少的治疗。联合疗法的使用随着治疗方案的增加而减少,本研究中接受三线或四线治疗的患者人数较少,这可能是由于随访时间较短所致。利妥昔单抗作为单药或联合用药的使用率最高;然而,使用的其他疗法种类繁多,这表明 FL 的标准治疗方法仍不明确。结论:目前尚未就最佳治疗顺序达成共识,患者在常规治疗中接受了多种积极的治疗方案。在美国确诊的这批当代 FL 患者中,利妥昔单抗疗法在单一疗法和联合疗法中均占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信