Gender disparity in disability among Chinese oldest-old: Age and cohort trends.

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Pan Chaoping, Wang Cen, Mohammedhamid Osman Kelifa, Li Xuyang, Peigang Wang
{"title":"Gender disparity in disability among Chinese oldest-old: Age and cohort trends.","authors":"Pan Chaoping,&nbsp;Wang Cen,&nbsp;Mohammedhamid Osman Kelifa,&nbsp;Li Xuyang,&nbsp;Peigang Wang","doi":"10.1080/08952841.2022.2031711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed at exploring gender disparity in disability and identifying related disablement process factors among Chinese oldest-old. Data came from eight waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study (CLHLS). A hierarchical logistic Age-Period-Cohort (A-P-C) model was used to estimate the trend of gender disparity, and related disablement process factors were further decomposed by the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition. Our results found that women had higher disabilities than men. The age-based trend of gender disparity in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) continued to decline; that in Functional Limitation (FL) increased at first and then declined. The cohort-based trend of gender disparity in IADL showed a decreasing trend with each subsequent cohort; that in FL showed an increasing trend. Among the disablement process factors, health behaviors and social supports were the most important contributors to gender disparity in disability. The disability was higher for women than men, and the gender differences were attenuated at very old ages. To reduce gender disparities in disability, more attention should be paid to relevant factors of gender disparity in disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women & Aging","volume":"35 3","pages":"243-258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2022.2031711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aimed at exploring gender disparity in disability and identifying related disablement process factors among Chinese oldest-old. Data came from eight waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study (CLHLS). A hierarchical logistic Age-Period-Cohort (A-P-C) model was used to estimate the trend of gender disparity, and related disablement process factors were further decomposed by the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition. Our results found that women had higher disabilities than men. The age-based trend of gender disparity in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) continued to decline; that in Functional Limitation (FL) increased at first and then declined. The cohort-based trend of gender disparity in IADL showed a decreasing trend with each subsequent cohort; that in FL showed an increasing trend. Among the disablement process factors, health behaviors and social supports were the most important contributors to gender disparity in disability. The disability was higher for women than men, and the gender differences were attenuated at very old ages. To reduce gender disparities in disability, more attention should be paid to relevant factors of gender disparity in disability.

中国老年人残疾的性别差异:年龄和队列趋势。
本研究旨在探讨中国老年人残障的性别差异及残障过程的相关因素。数据来自中国健康长寿纵向研究(CLHLS)的8个阶段。层次物流Age-Period-Cohort (A-P-C)模型被用来估计性别差异的趋势,以及相关因素进一步分解的去功能化过程Oaxaca-Blinder分解。我们的研究结果发现,女性的残疾程度高于男性。日常生活工具活动(Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, IADL)性别差异的年龄趋势持续下降;功能限制区(FL)呈先上升后下降的趋势。基于队列的IADL性别差异趋势在后续各队列中呈下降趋势;在FL中呈上升趋势。在残疾过程因素中,健康行为和社会支持是造成残疾性别差异的最重要因素。女性的残疾程度高于男性,而性别差异在老年时逐渐减弱。为减少残疾性别差异,应更多地关注残疾性别差异的相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信