Validity of Novel Outcome Measures for Hand Function Performance After Stroke Using Egocentric Video.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-13 DOI:10.1177/15459683231159663
Meng-Fen Tsai, Rosalie H Wang, José Zariffa
{"title":"Validity of Novel Outcome Measures for Hand Function Performance After Stroke Using Egocentric Video.","authors":"Meng-Fen Tsai,&nbsp;Rosalie H Wang,&nbsp;José Zariffa","doi":"10.1177/15459683231159663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating upper limb (UL) interventions after stroke calls for outcome measures that describe impact on daily life in the community. UL use ratio has been used to quantify the performance domain of UL function, but generally focuses on arm use only. A hand use ratio could provide additional information about UL function after stroke. Additionally, a ratio based on the role of the more-affected hand in bilateral activities (stabilizer or manipulator) may also reflect hand function recovery. Egocentric video is a novel modality that can record both dynamic and static hand use and hand roles at home after stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate hand use and hand role ratios from egocentric video against standardized clinical UL assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four stroke survivors recorded daily tasks in a home simulation laboratory and their daily routines at home using egocentric cameras. Spearman's correlation was used to compare the ratios with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Motor Activity Log-30 (MAL, Amount of Use (AoU), and Quality of Movement (QoM)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hand use ratio significantly correlated with the FMA-UE (0.60, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.81), ARAT (0.44, CI: 0.04, 0.72), MAL-AoU (0.80, CI: 0.59, 0.91), and MAL-QoM (0.79, CI: 0.57, 0.91). Hand role ratio had no significant correlations with the assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand use ratio automatically extracted from egocentric video, but not hand role ratio, was found to be a valid measure of hand function performance in our sample. Further investigation is necessary to interpret hand role information.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"37 2-3","pages":"142-150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/46/1f/10.1177_15459683231159663.PMC10080364.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231159663","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluating upper limb (UL) interventions after stroke calls for outcome measures that describe impact on daily life in the community. UL use ratio has been used to quantify the performance domain of UL function, but generally focuses on arm use only. A hand use ratio could provide additional information about UL function after stroke. Additionally, a ratio based on the role of the more-affected hand in bilateral activities (stabilizer or manipulator) may also reflect hand function recovery. Egocentric video is a novel modality that can record both dynamic and static hand use and hand roles at home after stroke.

Objective: To validate hand use and hand role ratios from egocentric video against standardized clinical UL assessments.

Methods: Twenty-four stroke survivors recorded daily tasks in a home simulation laboratory and their daily routines at home using egocentric cameras. Spearman's correlation was used to compare the ratios with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Motor Activity Log-30 (MAL, Amount of Use (AoU), and Quality of Movement (QoM)).

Results: Hand use ratio significantly correlated with the FMA-UE (0.60, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.81), ARAT (0.44, CI: 0.04, 0.72), MAL-AoU (0.80, CI: 0.59, 0.91), and MAL-QoM (0.79, CI: 0.57, 0.91). Hand role ratio had no significant correlations with the assessments.

Conclusion: Hand use ratio automatically extracted from egocentric video, but not hand role ratio, was found to be a valid measure of hand function performance in our sample. Further investigation is necessary to interpret hand role information.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用自我中心视频对中风后手功能表现的新结果测量的有效性。
背景:评估中风后的上肢(UL)干预需要描述对社区日常生活影响的结果测量。UL使用率已被用于量化UL功能的性能域,但通常只关注手臂使用。手的使用比率可以提供关于中风后UL功能的附加信息。此外,基于受影响较大的手在双边活动中的作用(稳定器或操纵器)的比率也可能反映手功能恢复。以自我为中心的视频是一种新颖的方式,可以记录中风后在家中动态和静态的手部使用和手部角色。目的:根据标准化临床UL评估,验证以自我为中心的视频中的手部使用和手部角色比例。方法:24名中风幸存者在家庭模拟实验室记录日常任务,并使用以自我为中心的相机记录他们在家的日常生活。使用Spearman相关性将这些比率与Fugl-Meyer上肢评估(FMA-UE)、动作研究臂测试(ARAT)和运动活动日志-30(MAL、使用量(AoU)和运动质量(QoM))进行比较,和MAL生活质量(0.79,CI:0.57,0.91)。手的角色比率与评估没有显著相关性。结论:在我们的样本中,从以自我为中心的视频中自动提取的手使用率,而不是手角色比例,是衡量手功能表现的有效指标。进一步的调查是必要的,以解释手的角色信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信