Developing a Decision Pathway for Family Presence During Resuscitation.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Carolina Dimsdale Tennyson, John P Oliver, Karen Roussel Jooste
{"title":"Developing a Decision Pathway for Family Presence During Resuscitation.","authors":"Carolina Dimsdale Tennyson,&nbsp;John P Oliver,&nbsp;Karen Roussel Jooste","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard of care for family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) is evolving, and leading organizations collectively recommend establishing institutional policy for its practice. Although FPDR is supported at this single institution, the process was not standardized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interprofessional group authored a decision pathway to standardize the care of families during inpatient code blue events at one institution. The pathway was reviewed and applied in code blue simulation events to highlight the role of the family facilitator and the importance of interprofessional teamwork skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The decision pathway is a patient-centered algorithm that promotes safety and family autonomy. Pathway recommendations are shaped by current literature, expert consensus, and existing institutional regulations. An on-call chaplain responds to all code blue events as the family facilitator and conducts assessments and decision making per the pathway. Clinical considerations include patient prioritization, family safety, sterility, and team consensus. One year after implementation, staff felt that it positively affected patient and family care. The frequency of inpatient FPDR did not increase after implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a result of the decision pathway implementation, FPDR is consistently a safe and coordinated option for patients' family members.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000577","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The standard of care for family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) is evolving, and leading organizations collectively recommend establishing institutional policy for its practice. Although FPDR is supported at this single institution, the process was not standardized.

Methods: An interprofessional group authored a decision pathway to standardize the care of families during inpatient code blue events at one institution. The pathway was reviewed and applied in code blue simulation events to highlight the role of the family facilitator and the importance of interprofessional teamwork skills.

Results: The decision pathway is a patient-centered algorithm that promotes safety and family autonomy. Pathway recommendations are shaped by current literature, expert consensus, and existing institutional regulations. An on-call chaplain responds to all code blue events as the family facilitator and conducts assessments and decision making per the pathway. Clinical considerations include patient prioritization, family safety, sterility, and team consensus. One year after implementation, staff felt that it positively affected patient and family care. The frequency of inpatient FPDR did not increase after implementation.

Conclusion: As a result of the decision pathway implementation, FPDR is consistently a safe and coordinated option for patients' family members.

在复苏过程中发展家庭存在的决策途径。
背景:复苏期间家属在场的护理标准(FPDR)正在发展,主要组织共同建议为其实践建立制度政策。虽然该机构支持FPDR,但该过程并未标准化。方法:一个跨专业小组撰写了一份决策路径,以规范一家机构住院患者蓝色代码事件期间的家庭护理。研究人员回顾了这一途径,并将其应用于蓝色代码模拟事件中,以突出家庭促进者的作用和跨专业团队合作技能的重要性。结果:该决策路径是一种以患者为中心的算法,促进了安全性和家庭自主性。路径建议是由当前文献、专家共识和现有制度规定形成的。一名随叫随到的牧师作为家庭促进者回应所有蓝色代码事件,并根据路径进行评估和决策。临床考虑包括患者优先级、家庭安全、不育和团队共识。实施一年后,工作人员认为它对病人和家属的护理产生了积极的影响。实施后住院FPDR的频率没有增加。结论:由于决策途径的实施,FPDR对患者家属来说始终是一种安全和协调的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信