Digital natives aren't concerned much about privacy, or are they?

Q1 Social Sciences
i-com Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1515/icom-2022-0041
Edith Maier, Michael Doerk, Ulrich Reimer, Matthias Baldauf
{"title":"Digital natives aren't concerned much about privacy, or are they?","authors":"Edith Maier,&nbsp;Michael Doerk,&nbsp;Ulrich Reimer,&nbsp;Matthias Baldauf","doi":"10.1515/icom-2022-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Voice assistants have become embedded in people's private spaces and domestic lives where they gather enormous amounts of personal information which is why they evoke serious privacy concerns. The paper reports the findings from a mixed-method study with 65 digital natives, their attitudes to privacy and actual and intended behaviour in privacy-sensitive situations and contexts. It also presents their recommendations to governments or organisations with regard to protecting their data. The results show that the majority are concerned about privacy but are willing to disclose personal data if the benefits outweigh the risks. The prevailing attitude is one characterised by uncertainty about what happens with their data, powerlessness about controlling their use, mistrust in big tech companies and uneasiness about the lack of transparency. Few take steps to self-manage their privacy, but rely on the government to take measures at the political and regulatory level. The respondents, however, show scant awareness of existing or planned legislation such as the GDPR and the Digital Services Act, respectively. A few participants are anxious to defend the analogue world and limit digitalization in general which in their opinion only opens the gate to surveillance and misuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":37105,"journal":{"name":"i-com","volume":"22 1","pages":"83-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081922/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i-com","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2022-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Voice assistants have become embedded in people's private spaces and domestic lives where they gather enormous amounts of personal information which is why they evoke serious privacy concerns. The paper reports the findings from a mixed-method study with 65 digital natives, their attitudes to privacy and actual and intended behaviour in privacy-sensitive situations and contexts. It also presents their recommendations to governments or organisations with regard to protecting their data. The results show that the majority are concerned about privacy but are willing to disclose personal data if the benefits outweigh the risks. The prevailing attitude is one characterised by uncertainty about what happens with their data, powerlessness about controlling their use, mistrust in big tech companies and uneasiness about the lack of transparency. Few take steps to self-manage their privacy, but rely on the government to take measures at the political and regulatory level. The respondents, however, show scant awareness of existing or planned legislation such as the GDPR and the Digital Services Act, respectively. A few participants are anxious to defend the analogue world and limit digitalization in general which in their opinion only opens the gate to surveillance and misuse.

Abstract Image

数字原生代不太关心隐私,是吗?
语音助手已经融入了人们的私人空间和家庭生活,它们收集了大量的个人信息,这就是为什么它们引起了严重的隐私问题。本文报告了一项对65名数字原生代进行的混合方法研究的结果,研究了他们对隐私的态度,以及在隐私敏感的情况和背景下的实际和预期行为。它还向政府或组织提出了关于保护其数据的建议。调查结果显示,大多数人担心隐私问题,但如果好处大于风险,他们愿意披露个人数据。主流态度的特点是:不确定他们的数据会发生什么,对控制数据的使用无能为力,对大型科技公司的不信任,以及对缺乏透明度的不安。很少有人采取措施自我管理自己的隐私,而是依靠政府在政治和监管层面采取措施。然而,受访者对现有或计划中的立法(如GDPR和数字服务法案)知之甚少。一些参与者急于捍卫模拟世界,并限制数字化,在他们看来,这只会打开监控和滥用的大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
i-com
i-com Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信