Is gallbladder PoCUS diagnostic accuracy accessible to medical students after PoCUS training exclusively on healthy volunteers? A pilot randomized control trial.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine
Florence Dupriez, Bastian Rodrigues de Castro, Félix Gendebien, Antoine Fasseaux, Matthieu Gensburger, Laurent Marissiaux, Andrea Penaloza, Xavier Bobbia, Robert Jarman
{"title":"Is gallbladder PoCUS diagnostic accuracy accessible to medical students after PoCUS training exclusively on healthy volunteers? A pilot randomized control trial.","authors":"Florence Dupriez,&nbsp;Bastian Rodrigues de Castro,&nbsp;Félix Gendebien,&nbsp;Antoine Fasseaux,&nbsp;Matthieu Gensburger,&nbsp;Laurent Marissiaux,&nbsp;Andrea Penaloza,&nbsp;Xavier Bobbia,&nbsp;Robert Jarman","doi":"10.1186/s13089-023-00317-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is increasingly used in clinical practice and is now included in many undergraduate curricula. Here, we aimed to determine whether medical students who participated in a PoCUS teaching program with several practical training sessions involving healthy volunteers could achieve a good level of diagnostic accuracy in identifying gallbladder pathologies. The intervention group (IG) was trained exclusively on volunteers with a healthy gallbladder, whereas the control group (CG) had access to volunteers with a pathological gallbladder as recommended in most PoCUS curricula.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty medical students were randomly assigned to the IG and CG. After completing the training program over 2 months, students were evaluated by three independent examiners. Students and examiners were blind to group allocation and study outcome. Sensitivity and specificity of students' PoCUS gallstone diagnosis were assessed. Secondary outcomes were students' confidence, image quality, acquisition time, and PoCUS skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity and specificity for gallstone diagnosis were, respectively, 0.85 and 0.97 in the IG and 0.80 and 0.83 in the CG. Areas under the curve (AUC) based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were 0.91 and 0.82 in the IG and CG, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.271) and an AUC difference of -0.092. No significant between-group difference was found for the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our pilot study showed that medical students can develop PoCUS diagnostic accuracy after training on healthy volunteers. If these findings are confirmed in a larger sample, this could favor the delivery of large practical teaching sessions without the need to include patients with pathology, thus facilitating PoCUS training for students.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-023-00317-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is increasingly used in clinical practice and is now included in many undergraduate curricula. Here, we aimed to determine whether medical students who participated in a PoCUS teaching program with several practical training sessions involving healthy volunteers could achieve a good level of diagnostic accuracy in identifying gallbladder pathologies. The intervention group (IG) was trained exclusively on volunteers with a healthy gallbladder, whereas the control group (CG) had access to volunteers with a pathological gallbladder as recommended in most PoCUS curricula.

Materials and methods: Twenty medical students were randomly assigned to the IG and CG. After completing the training program over 2 months, students were evaluated by three independent examiners. Students and examiners were blind to group allocation and study outcome. Sensitivity and specificity of students' PoCUS gallstone diagnosis were assessed. Secondary outcomes were students' confidence, image quality, acquisition time, and PoCUS skills.

Results: Sensitivity and specificity for gallstone diagnosis were, respectively, 0.85 and 0.97 in the IG and 0.80 and 0.83 in the CG. Areas under the curve (AUC) based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were 0.91 and 0.82 in the IG and CG, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.271) and an AUC difference of -0.092. No significant between-group difference was found for the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: Our pilot study showed that medical students can develop PoCUS diagnostic accuracy after training on healthy volunteers. If these findings are confirmed in a larger sample, this could favor the delivery of large practical teaching sessions without the need to include patients with pathology, thus facilitating PoCUS training for students.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

仅对健康志愿者进行PoCUS培训后,医学生能否获得胆囊PoCUS诊断的准确性?一项随机对照试验。
背景:点护理超声(PoCUS)越来越多地应用于临床实践,现在包括在许多本科课程。在这里,我们的目的是确定参加PoCUS教学计划的医学生是否能够在识别胆囊病理方面达到良好的诊断准确性。干预组(IG)只对胆囊健康的志愿者进行培训,而对照组(CG)则按照大多数PoCUS课程的建议,对胆囊病理的志愿者进行培训。材料与方法:将20名医学生随机分为IG组和CG组。在完成两个多月的培训项目后,学生们由三名独立考官进行评估。学生和考官对分组分配和学习结果一无所知。评估学生PoCUS诊断胆结石的敏感性和特异性。次要结果是学生的信心、图像质量、获取时间和PoCUS技能。结果:IG诊断胆结石的敏感性和特异性分别为0.85和0.97,CG诊断胆结石的敏感性和特异性分别为0.80和0.83。根据受试者工作特征曲线分析,IG组和CG组的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.91和0.82,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.271), AUC差异为-0.092。次要结果组间无显著差异。结论:我们的初步研究表明,医学生在接受健康志愿者的培训后,可以提高PoCUS诊断的准确性。如果这些发现在更大的样本中得到证实,这将有利于在不需要包括病理患者的情况下进行大型实践教学,从而促进PoCUS对学生的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信