Perception of oral contraception - do women think differently from gynaecologists?

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Fátima Palma, Ana Rosa Costa, Joaquim Neves, Amália Pacheco, M Céu Almeida, Teresa Bombas, Daniel P Silva
{"title":"Perception of oral contraception - do women think differently from gynaecologists?","authors":"Fátima Palma,&nbsp;Ana Rosa Costa,&nbsp;Joaquim Neves,&nbsp;Amália Pacheco,&nbsp;M Céu Almeida,&nbsp;Teresa Bombas,&nbsp;Daniel P Silva","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2023.2185482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the experience and satisfaction with contraceptives and use of Combined Oral Contraceptives (COC) by women and compare their perceptions with those of gynaecologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentre survey study conducted in Portugal, during April and May, 2021 with women using contraceptives and gynaecologists. Online quantitative questionnaires were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1508 women and 100 gynaecologists were included. Cycle control was the pill non-contraceptive benefit most valued by gynaecologists and women. For gynaecologists, the main pill concern was the risk of thromboembolic events, but they believed that weight gain was the main concern for their patients. The pill was the most used contraceptive (70%) and women were largely (92%) satisfied. The pill was associated with health risks for 85% of users, mainly thrombosis (83%), weight gain (47%), and cancer (37%). The attributes of the pill most valued by women are contraceptive efficacy (82%), followed by low risk of thromboembolic events (68%), good cycle control (60%), non-interference with libido and mood (59%) and weight (53%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most women use contraceptive pills and are generally satisfied with their contraceptive. Cycle control was the most valued non-contraceptive benefit for gynaecologists and women, agreeing with physicians' beliefs about women. On the other hand, contrary to physicians' beliefs, that women's main concern is weight gain, women are mainly concerned with risks associated with contraceptives. Thromboembolic events are women's and gynaecologists most valued risk. Finally, this study indicates the need for physicians to better understand what COC users really fear.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2023.2185482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the experience and satisfaction with contraceptives and use of Combined Oral Contraceptives (COC) by women and compare their perceptions with those of gynaecologists.

Methods: This was a multicentre survey study conducted in Portugal, during April and May, 2021 with women using contraceptives and gynaecologists. Online quantitative questionnaires were carried out.

Results: A total of 1508 women and 100 gynaecologists were included. Cycle control was the pill non-contraceptive benefit most valued by gynaecologists and women. For gynaecologists, the main pill concern was the risk of thromboembolic events, but they believed that weight gain was the main concern for their patients. The pill was the most used contraceptive (70%) and women were largely (92%) satisfied. The pill was associated with health risks for 85% of users, mainly thrombosis (83%), weight gain (47%), and cancer (37%). The attributes of the pill most valued by women are contraceptive efficacy (82%), followed by low risk of thromboembolic events (68%), good cycle control (60%), non-interference with libido and mood (59%) and weight (53%).

Conclusion: Most women use contraceptive pills and are generally satisfied with their contraceptive. Cycle control was the most valued non-contraceptive benefit for gynaecologists and women, agreeing with physicians' beliefs about women. On the other hand, contrary to physicians' beliefs, that women's main concern is weight gain, women are mainly concerned with risks associated with contraceptives. Thromboembolic events are women's and gynaecologists most valued risk. Finally, this study indicates the need for physicians to better understand what COC users really fear.

对口服避孕药的看法——女性的想法与妇科医生不同吗?
目的:本研究旨在评估妇女对避孕药和复方口服避孕药(COC)使用的体验和满意度,并将其与妇科医生的看法进行比较。方法:这是一项多中心调查研究,于2021年4月和5月在葡萄牙进行,使用避孕药的妇女和妇科医生。进行了在线定量问卷调查。结果:共纳入1508名妇女和100名妇科医生。周期控制是妇科医生和妇女最重视的非避孕药的好处。对于妇科医生来说,服用避孕药的主要担忧是血栓栓塞事件的风险,但他们认为体重增加是患者的主要担忧。避孕丸是最常用的避孕方法(70%),大部分女性(92%)对此感到满意。对85%的服用者来说,避孕药与健康风险相关,主要是血栓形成(83%)、体重增加(47%)和癌症(37%)。女性最看重的避孕药属性是避孕效果(82%),其次是血栓栓塞事件的低风险(68%)、良好的周期控制(60%)、不干扰性欲和情绪(59%)以及体重(53%)。结论:大多数妇女使用避孕药,避孕效果总体满意。周期控制是妇科医生和女性最看重的非避孕益处,与医生对女性的看法一致。另一方面,与医生认为女性主要担心的是体重增加相反,女性主要担心的是与避孕药有关的风险。血栓栓塞事件是妇女和妇科医生最重视的风险。最后,这项研究表明医生需要更好地了解COC使用者真正害怕的是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信