Association between Early Feeding Patterns and Neonatal Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Neonatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000527522
Wesam Alyahya, Judith Simpson, Ada L Garcia, Helen Mactier, David Young, Christine A Edwards
{"title":"Association between Early Feeding Patterns and Neonatal Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Wesam Alyahya,&nbsp;Judith Simpson,&nbsp;Ada L Garcia,&nbsp;Helen Mactier,&nbsp;David Young,&nbsp;Christine A Edwards","doi":"10.1159/000527522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mother's own milk (MOM) is the optimal feed for premature infants but may not always be sufficiently available. Alternative feeding includes donor human milk (DONOR), with or without fortification and preterm formula. This study evaluated the association between early feeding with exclusively and predominantly MOM (MAINLY-MOM) versus MOM supplemented with fortified DONOR (MOM + DONOR) or preterm formula (MOM + FORMULA) and in-hospital growth and neonatal morbidities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a multicentre (n = 13 units) cohort study of infants born at <32 weeks' gestation. Data captured at the point of care were extracted from the UK National Neonatal Research Database. The study groups were defined based on feeding patterns within the first 2 weeks of life using predefined cut-offs. The primary outcome was the in-hospital growth rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1,272 infants were analysed. Infants fell into two groups: extremely preterm (EPT) infants and very preterm (VPT) infants, born after <28 weeks and 28 to <32 weeks of gestation, respectively. Only 11 of 365 EPT infants received formula supplements, precluding a useful comparison of MOM + DONOR and MOM + FORMULA. There was no difference in median (25th-75th centile) growth velocity over the first 30 days of life between the MAINLY-MOM (n = 248) and MOM + DONOR (n = 106) groups: 10 (8-13) versus 10 (7-13) g/kg/day. Similarly, for VPT infants, there was no difference in growth velocities between MAINLY-MOM (n = 407), MOM + DONOR (N = 196), and MOM + FORMULA (N = 304): 11 (8-14) versus 11 (8-14) versus 11 (8-14) g/kg/day. Head growth did not differ (p value = 0.670). Cox regression analysis showed no difference in time to discharge between feeding types or any difference in major neonatal morbidities. In both EPT and VPT infants, growth velocity from the time of regaining birth weight to discharge was significantly lower in the MAINLY-MOM group compared to the MOM-DONOR group (EPT: 12.5 [11-14.2] vs. 14 [12.3-15.9] p = 0.45, VPT 13.5 [11-15.7] vs. 14.5 [12.6-16.8] p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early feeding with fortified DONOR, in comparison to formula, to supplement MOM was not associated with any differences in short-term growth, length of stay, and neonatal morbidities. However, early feeding with mainly maternal milk, compared to maternal milk supplemented with DONOR, was associated with significantly lower overall weight gain.</p>","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":"120 1","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mother's own milk (MOM) is the optimal feed for premature infants but may not always be sufficiently available. Alternative feeding includes donor human milk (DONOR), with or without fortification and preterm formula. This study evaluated the association between early feeding with exclusively and predominantly MOM (MAINLY-MOM) versus MOM supplemented with fortified DONOR (MOM + DONOR) or preterm formula (MOM + FORMULA) and in-hospital growth and neonatal morbidities.

Method: This was a multicentre (n = 13 units) cohort study of infants born at <32 weeks' gestation. Data captured at the point of care were extracted from the UK National Neonatal Research Database. The study groups were defined based on feeding patterns within the first 2 weeks of life using predefined cut-offs. The primary outcome was the in-hospital growth rate.

Results: Data from 1,272 infants were analysed. Infants fell into two groups: extremely preterm (EPT) infants and very preterm (VPT) infants, born after <28 weeks and 28 to <32 weeks of gestation, respectively. Only 11 of 365 EPT infants received formula supplements, precluding a useful comparison of MOM + DONOR and MOM + FORMULA. There was no difference in median (25th-75th centile) growth velocity over the first 30 days of life between the MAINLY-MOM (n = 248) and MOM + DONOR (n = 106) groups: 10 (8-13) versus 10 (7-13) g/kg/day. Similarly, for VPT infants, there was no difference in growth velocities between MAINLY-MOM (n = 407), MOM + DONOR (N = 196), and MOM + FORMULA (N = 304): 11 (8-14) versus 11 (8-14) versus 11 (8-14) g/kg/day. Head growth did not differ (p value = 0.670). Cox regression analysis showed no difference in time to discharge between feeding types or any difference in major neonatal morbidities. In both EPT and VPT infants, growth velocity from the time of regaining birth weight to discharge was significantly lower in the MAINLY-MOM group compared to the MOM-DONOR group (EPT: 12.5 [11-14.2] vs. 14 [12.3-15.9] p = 0.45, VPT 13.5 [11-15.7] vs. 14.5 [12.6-16.8] p = 0.015).

Conclusion: Early feeding with fortified DONOR, in comparison to formula, to supplement MOM was not associated with any differences in short-term growth, length of stay, and neonatal morbidities. However, early feeding with mainly maternal milk, compared to maternal milk supplemented with DONOR, was associated with significantly lower overall weight gain.

极早产儿早期喂养方式与新生儿结局之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:母乳(MOM)是早产儿的最佳饲料,但可能并不总是足够的。替代喂养包括供体母乳(donor),有或没有强化和早产儿配方奶粉。本研究评估了早期喂养完全和主要母乳喂养(主要母乳喂养)与母乳喂养补充强化供体(母乳喂养+供体喂养)或早产儿配方奶(母乳喂养+配方奶喂养)与住院生长和新生儿发病率之间的关系。方法:这是一项多中心(n = 13个单位)队列研究,研究对象是出生在美国的婴儿。结果:分析了1272名婴儿的数据。婴儿分为两组:极早产儿(EPT)和极早产儿(VPT)。结论:与配方奶相比,早期喂养强化DONOR以补充MOM在短期生长、住院时间和新生儿发病率方面没有任何差异。然而,与母乳中添加DONOR相比,以母乳为主的早期喂养与总体体重增加显著降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neonatology
Neonatology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信