Registered nurses' and speech language pathologists' interprofessional collaboration: A systematic scoping review of the literature.

IF 1.9 Q1 NURSING
NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-26 DOI:10.1111/nuf.12802
Rosaleen D Bloom, Virginia E Tufano, Cecilia T Perez
{"title":"Registered nurses' and speech language pathologists' interprofessional collaboration: A systematic scoping review of the literature.","authors":"Rosaleen D Bloom, Virginia E Tufano, Cecilia T Perez","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objective: </strong>To identify the current research involving interprofessional collaboration between registered nurses (RNs) and speech language pathologists (SLPs) in healthcare and educational settings.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>As the complexity of healthcare increases, the need for active interprofessional collaboration between RNs and SLPs grows. A review of the literature revealed no systematic reviews currently exist about interprofessional collaborative studies between RNs and SLPs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Researchers conducted a scoping review using PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online databases were used to identify qualitative and quantitative research studies written in English and conducted between 2011 and 2020. Databases included Academic Search Ultimate, ASHA Wire, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ERIC, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and SEMANTIC SCHOLAR. The studies needed to focus on the interprofessional collaboration between RNs and SLPs or students in these professions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 128 sources, only six studies met scoping review criteria. The primary focus of three studies was an evaluation of interprofessional education activities between nursing, speech language pathology, and other health profession students. One study explored interprofessional education in clinical practice between RNs and SLPs. Two studies explored interprofessional collaboration in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More research is needed that investigates interprofessional collaboration and practice of RNs and SLPs in the healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This review identified the need for RNs and SLPs to work effectively as interprofessional teams are important in improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1129-1136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/66/NUF-57-1129.PMC10086846.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objective: To identify the current research involving interprofessional collaboration between registered nurses (RNs) and speech language pathologists (SLPs) in healthcare and educational settings.

Background: As the complexity of healthcare increases, the need for active interprofessional collaboration between RNs and SLPs grows. A review of the literature revealed no systematic reviews currently exist about interprofessional collaborative studies between RNs and SLPs.

Design: Researchers conducted a scoping review using PRISMA guidelines.

Methods: Online databases were used to identify qualitative and quantitative research studies written in English and conducted between 2011 and 2020. Databases included Academic Search Ultimate, ASHA Wire, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ERIC, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and SEMANTIC SCHOLAR. The studies needed to focus on the interprofessional collaboration between RNs and SLPs or students in these professions.

Findings: Of the 128 sources, only six studies met scoping review criteria. The primary focus of three studies was an evaluation of interprofessional education activities between nursing, speech language pathology, and other health profession students. One study explored interprofessional education in clinical practice between RNs and SLPs. Two studies explored interprofessional collaboration in the clinical setting.

Conclusion: More research is needed that investigates interprofessional collaboration and practice of RNs and SLPs in the healthcare setting.

Relevance to clinical practice: This review identified the need for RNs and SLPs to work effectively as interprofessional teams are important in improving patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

注册护士和语言病理学家的跨专业合作:文献的系统范围综述。
目的和目的:了解当前在医疗保健和教育机构中,注册护士(RNs)和言语语言病理学家(slp)之间跨专业合作的研究现状。背景:随着医疗保健复杂性的增加,注册护士和slp之间积极的跨专业协作的需求也在增长。文献综述显示,目前还没有关于注册护士和slp之间跨专业合作研究的系统综述。设计:研究人员使用PRISMA指南进行了范围审查。方法:使用在线数据库识别2011年至2020年期间用英语撰写的定性和定量研究。数据库包括Academic Search Ultimate, ASHA Wire, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ERIC, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, SEMANTIC SCHOLAR。这些研究需要关注注册护士与专业学生或专业学生之间的跨专业合作。结果:在128个来源中,只有6个研究符合范围评价标准。三项研究的主要重点是评估护理、言语语言病理学和其他卫生专业学生之间的跨专业教育活动。一项研究探讨了注册护士和slp在临床实践中的跨专业教育。两项研究探讨了临床环境中的跨专业合作。结论:需要更多的研究来调查医疗环境中注册护士和slp的跨专业合作和实践。与临床实践的相关性:本综述确定了注册护士和slp作为跨专业团队有效合作的必要性,这对改善患者预后非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NURSING FORUM
NURSING FORUM NURSING-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书