How Did an Integrated Health and Social Services Center in the Quebec Province Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Qualitative Case Study.

Morgane Gabet, Arnaud Duhoux, Valéry Ridde, Kate Zinszer, Lara Gautier, Pierre-Marie David
{"title":"How Did an Integrated Health and Social Services Center in the Quebec Province Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Qualitative Case Study.","authors":"Morgane Gabet,&nbsp;Arnaud Duhoux,&nbsp;Valéry Ridde,&nbsp;Kate Zinszer,&nbsp;Lara Gautier,&nbsp;Pierre-Marie David","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2023.2186824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the first and second waves of the pandemic, Quebec was among the Canadian provinces with the highest COVID-19 mortality rates. Facing particularly large COVID-19 outbreaks in its facilities, an integrated health and social services center in the province of Quebec (Canada), developed resilience strategies. To explore these diverse responses to the crisis, we conducted a case study analysis of a Quebec integrated health and social services center, building on a conceptualization of resilience strategies using \"configurations\" of effects, strategies, and impacts. Qualitative data from 14 indepth interviews conducted in the summer and fall of 2020 with managers and frontline practitioners were analyzed through the lens of situations of \"anticipation,\" \"reaction,\" or \"inaction.\" The findings were discussed in three results dissemination workshops, two with practitioners and one with managers, to discern lessons they learned. Three major configurations emerged: 1) reorganization of services and spaces to accommodate more COVID-19 patients; 2) management of contamination risks for patients and professionals; and 3) management of personal protective equipment (PPE), supplies, and medications. Within these configurations, the responses to the crisis were strongly shaped by the 2015 health care system reforms in Quebec and were constrained by organizational challenges that included a centralized model of governance, a history of substantial budget cuts to longterm care facilities, and a systematic lack of human resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"9 2","pages":"2186824"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2023.2186824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

During the first and second waves of the pandemic, Quebec was among the Canadian provinces with the highest COVID-19 mortality rates. Facing particularly large COVID-19 outbreaks in its facilities, an integrated health and social services center in the province of Quebec (Canada), developed resilience strategies. To explore these diverse responses to the crisis, we conducted a case study analysis of a Quebec integrated health and social services center, building on a conceptualization of resilience strategies using "configurations" of effects, strategies, and impacts. Qualitative data from 14 indepth interviews conducted in the summer and fall of 2020 with managers and frontline practitioners were analyzed through the lens of situations of "anticipation," "reaction," or "inaction." The findings were discussed in three results dissemination workshops, two with practitioners and one with managers, to discern lessons they learned. Three major configurations emerged: 1) reorganization of services and spaces to accommodate more COVID-19 patients; 2) management of contamination risks for patients and professionals; and 3) management of personal protective equipment (PPE), supplies, and medications. Within these configurations, the responses to the crisis were strongly shaped by the 2015 health care system reforms in Quebec and were constrained by organizational challenges that included a centralized model of governance, a history of substantial budget cuts to longterm care facilities, and a systematic lack of human resources.

魁北克省的综合卫生和社会服务中心如何应对COVID-19大流行?定性案例研究。
在第一波和第二波大流行期间,魁北克是加拿大COVID-19死亡率最高的省份之一。加拿大魁北克省的一个综合卫生和社会服务中心面对其设施内特别大规模的COVID-19疫情,制定了抵御能力战略。为了探索对危机的这些不同反应,我们对魁北克综合卫生和社会服务中心进行了案例研究分析,利用效果、战略和影响的“配置”,在复原力战略概念化的基础上进行了分析。在2020年夏秋两季对管理人员和一线从业人员进行的14次深度访谈中,通过“预期”、“反应”或“不作为”的情况对定性数据进行了分析。研究结果在三个成果传播研讨会上进行了讨论,其中两个与从业人员讨论,一个与管理人员讨论,以了解他们吸取的教训。出现了三个主要配置:1)重组服务和空间,以容纳更多的COVID-19患者;2)对患者和专业人员的污染风险管理;3)个人防护装备、用品和药物的管理。在这些配置中,对危机的反应受到魁北克2015年医疗保健系统改革的强烈影响,并受到组织挑战的限制,这些挑战包括集中治理模式,长期护理设施的大幅预算削减历史,以及系统性的人力资源缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信