Derivation and validation of pragmatic clinical models to predict hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220103
Alexandra Fottinger, Anan Bader Eddeen, Douglas S Lee, Graham Woodward, Louise Y Sun
{"title":"Derivation and validation of pragmatic clinical models to predict hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.","authors":"Alexandra Fottinger,&nbsp;Anan Bader Eddeen,&nbsp;Douglas S Lee,&nbsp;Graham Woodward,&nbsp;Louise Y Sun","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac surgery is resource intensive and often requires multidisciplinary involvement to facilitate discharge. To facilitate evidence-based resource planning, we derived and validated clinical models to predict postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used linked, population-level databases with information on all Ontario residents and included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, valvular or thoracic aorta surgeries between October 2008 and September 2019. The primary outcome was hospital LOS. The models were derived by using patients who had surgery before Sept. 30, 2016, and validated after that date. To address the rightward skew in LOS data and to identify top-tier resource users, we used logistic regression to derive a model to predict the likelihood of LOS being more than the 98th percentile (> 30 d), and γ regression in the remainder to predict continuous LOS in days. We used backward stepwise variable selection for both models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 105 193 patients, 2422 (2.3%) had an LOS of more than 30 days. Factors predicting prolonged LOS included age, female sex, procedure type and urgency, comorbidities including frailty, high-risk acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and psychiatric and pulmonary circulatory disease. The C statistic was 0.92 for the prolonged LOS model and the mean absolute error was 2.4 days for the continuous LOS model.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We derived and validated clinical models to identify top-tier resource users and predict continuous LOS with excellent accuracy. Our models could be used to benchmark clinical performance based on expected LOS, rationally allocate resources and support patient-centred operative decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 1","pages":"E180-E190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/e3/cmajo.20220103.PMC9981165.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac surgery is resource intensive and often requires multidisciplinary involvement to facilitate discharge. To facilitate evidence-based resource planning, we derived and validated clinical models to predict postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS).

Methods: We used linked, population-level databases with information on all Ontario residents and included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, valvular or thoracic aorta surgeries between October 2008 and September 2019. The primary outcome was hospital LOS. The models were derived by using patients who had surgery before Sept. 30, 2016, and validated after that date. To address the rightward skew in LOS data and to identify top-tier resource users, we used logistic regression to derive a model to predict the likelihood of LOS being more than the 98th percentile (> 30 d), and γ regression in the remainder to predict continuous LOS in days. We used backward stepwise variable selection for both models.

Results: Among 105 193 patients, 2422 (2.3%) had an LOS of more than 30 days. Factors predicting prolonged LOS included age, female sex, procedure type and urgency, comorbidities including frailty, high-risk acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and psychiatric and pulmonary circulatory disease. The C statistic was 0.92 for the prolonged LOS model and the mean absolute error was 2.4 days for the continuous LOS model.

Interpretation: We derived and validated clinical models to identify top-tier resource users and predict continuous LOS with excellent accuracy. Our models could be used to benchmark clinical performance based on expected LOS, rationally allocate resources and support patient-centred operative decision-making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

推导和验证实用的临床模型来预测加拿大安大略省心脏手术后住院时间:一项基于人群的队列研究。
背景:心脏手术是资源密集的,往往需要多学科参与,以促进出院。为了促进循证资源规划,我们推导并验证了预测术后住院时间(LOS)的临床模型。方法:我们使用关联的人口水平数据库,其中包含所有安大略省居民的信息,包括2008年10月至2019年9月期间接受冠状动脉搭桥术、瓣膜或胸主动脉手术的18岁及以上患者。主要结局为医院LOS。这些模型是通过使用2016年9月30日之前接受手术的患者得出的,并在该日期之后得到验证。为了解决LOS数据中向右倾斜的问题并识别顶级资源用户,我们使用逻辑回归来推导一个模型来预测LOS超过第98个百分位数(> 30天)的可能性,并在其余部分中使用γ回归来预测连续的LOS。我们对两个模型都使用了后向逐步变量选择。结果:105193例患者中,2422例(2.3%)的LOS超过30天。预测LOS延长的因素包括年龄、女性性别、手术类型和紧迫性、合并症包括虚弱、高危急性冠状动脉综合征、心力衰竭、左心室射血分数降低、精神和肺循环疾病。延长LOS模型的C统计量为0.92,连续LOS模型的平均绝对误差为2.4天。解释:我们推导并验证了临床模型,以确定顶级资源用户,并以极高的准确性预测持续的LOS。我们的模型可用于基于预期LOS的临床表现基准,合理分配资源并支持以患者为中心的手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信