Students' Approaches to Learning During Pre-Clinical and Clinical Phases of a Veterinary Curriculum, Their Motivations, and Their Correlation with GPA.
IF 1.1 3区 农林科学Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
{"title":"Students' Approaches to Learning During Pre-Clinical and Clinical Phases of a Veterinary Curriculum, Their Motivations, and Their Correlation with GPA.","authors":"David A Upchurch, Kirsty Fox","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2022-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to determine if veterinary students adopt a different approach to learning in the clinical compared to pre-clinical phase, and what factors motivate their approach. We also sought to determine if the learning approach adopted correlates with grade point average (GPA). Two questionnaires were administered to the same cohort of students (112 students) at the end of the pre-clinical and at the end of the clinical phase. A total of 87 students completed at least one questionnaire. The questionnaires included the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for students, which was used to provide scores for three learning approaches: surface (focus on memorization), strategic (focus on optimum grades), and deep (focus on understanding). The questionnaires also included open-ended questions probing for motivations behind adopting learning approaches. Statistical analyses were performed on the data to detect correlations between variables. Students were more likely to adopt a surface approach in the pre-clinical phase than in the clinical phase, although other learning approaches were not different between phases. No strong correlations existed between learning approach and GPA. Students who adopted a deep approach were typically motivated by higher-level motivations than those who adopted a surface approach, especially in the clinical phase. Time constraints, the desire to get good grades, and passing classes were the main reasons for adopting the surface approach. The results of the study can be beneficial for students by allowing them to identify those pressures that could prevent them from adopting a deeper approach earlier in the curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"58-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2022-0129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine if veterinary students adopt a different approach to learning in the clinical compared to pre-clinical phase, and what factors motivate their approach. We also sought to determine if the learning approach adopted correlates with grade point average (GPA). Two questionnaires were administered to the same cohort of students (112 students) at the end of the pre-clinical and at the end of the clinical phase. A total of 87 students completed at least one questionnaire. The questionnaires included the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for students, which was used to provide scores for three learning approaches: surface (focus on memorization), strategic (focus on optimum grades), and deep (focus on understanding). The questionnaires also included open-ended questions probing for motivations behind adopting learning approaches. Statistical analyses were performed on the data to detect correlations between variables. Students were more likely to adopt a surface approach in the pre-clinical phase than in the clinical phase, although other learning approaches were not different between phases. No strong correlations existed between learning approach and GPA. Students who adopted a deep approach were typically motivated by higher-level motivations than those who adopted a surface approach, especially in the clinical phase. Time constraints, the desire to get good grades, and passing classes were the main reasons for adopting the surface approach. The results of the study can be beneficial for students by allowing them to identify those pressures that could prevent them from adopting a deeper approach earlier in the curriculum.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society.
The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.