Students' Approaches to Learning During Pre-Clinical and Clinical Phases of a Veterinary Curriculum, Their Motivations, and Their Correlation with GPA.

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of veterinary medical education Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-03 DOI:10.3138/jvme-2022-0129
David A Upchurch, Kirsty Fox
{"title":"Students' Approaches to Learning During Pre-Clinical and Clinical Phases of a Veterinary Curriculum, Their Motivations, and Their Correlation with GPA.","authors":"David A Upchurch, Kirsty Fox","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2022-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to determine if veterinary students adopt a different approach to learning in the clinical compared to pre-clinical phase, and what factors motivate their approach. We also sought to determine if the learning approach adopted correlates with grade point average (GPA). Two questionnaires were administered to the same cohort of students (112 students) at the end of the pre-clinical and at the end of the clinical phase. A total of 87 students completed at least one questionnaire. The questionnaires included the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for students, which was used to provide scores for three learning approaches: surface (focus on memorization), strategic (focus on optimum grades), and deep (focus on understanding). The questionnaires also included open-ended questions probing for motivations behind adopting learning approaches. Statistical analyses were performed on the data to detect correlations between variables. Students were more likely to adopt a surface approach in the pre-clinical phase than in the clinical phase, although other learning approaches were not different between phases. No strong correlations existed between learning approach and GPA. Students who adopted a deep approach were typically motivated by higher-level motivations than those who adopted a surface approach, especially in the clinical phase. Time constraints, the desire to get good grades, and passing classes were the main reasons for adopting the surface approach. The results of the study can be beneficial for students by allowing them to identify those pressures that could prevent them from adopting a deeper approach earlier in the curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"58-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2022-0129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine if veterinary students adopt a different approach to learning in the clinical compared to pre-clinical phase, and what factors motivate their approach. We also sought to determine if the learning approach adopted correlates with grade point average (GPA). Two questionnaires were administered to the same cohort of students (112 students) at the end of the pre-clinical and at the end of the clinical phase. A total of 87 students completed at least one questionnaire. The questionnaires included the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for students, which was used to provide scores for three learning approaches: surface (focus on memorization), strategic (focus on optimum grades), and deep (focus on understanding). The questionnaires also included open-ended questions probing for motivations behind adopting learning approaches. Statistical analyses were performed on the data to detect correlations between variables. Students were more likely to adopt a surface approach in the pre-clinical phase than in the clinical phase, although other learning approaches were not different between phases. No strong correlations existed between learning approach and GPA. Students who adopted a deep approach were typically motivated by higher-level motivations than those who adopted a surface approach, especially in the clinical phase. Time constraints, the desire to get good grades, and passing classes were the main reasons for adopting the surface approach. The results of the study can be beneficial for students by allowing them to identify those pressures that could prevent them from adopting a deeper approach earlier in the curriculum.

学生在兽医课程的临床前和临床阶段的学习方法、动机及其与 GPA 的相关性。
本研究旨在确定兽医专业学生在临床阶段与临床前阶段是否采用了不同的学习方法,以及促使他们采用这种方法的因素是什么。我们还试图确定所采用的学习方法是否与平均学分绩点(GPA)相关。在临床前和临床阶段结束时,我们对同一批学生(112 名)进行了两次问卷调查。共有 87 名学生至少完成了一份问卷。问卷包括 "学生学习方法和学习技巧量表",用于提供三种学习方法的得分:表层(注重记忆)、战略(注重最佳成绩)和深层(注重理解)。问卷还包括开放式问题,探究学生采用学习方法的动机。对数据进行了统计分析,以检测变量之间的相关性。与临床阶段相比,学生在临床前阶段更倾向于采用表层学习方法,但其他学习方法在不同阶段并无差异。学习方法与 GPA 之间没有很强的相关性。与采用表面学习方法的学生相比,采用深层学习方法的学生通常具有更高层次的学习动机,尤其是在临床阶段。时间限制、希望取得好成绩和及格是采用表面学习法的主要原因。研究结果对学生很有帮助,可以让他们找出那些可能阻碍他们在课程早期采用深层次方法的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信