Practicability of a Virtual Consultation to Evaluate the Shoulder Joint.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Martin Gathen, Davide Cucchi, Tom Jansen, Hans Goost, Frank Alexander Schildberg, Christof Burger, Dieter Christian Wirtz, Koroush Kabir, Kristian Welle
{"title":"Practicability of a Virtual Consultation to Evaluate the Shoulder Joint.","authors":"Martin Gathen,&nbsp;Davide Cucchi,&nbsp;Tom Jansen,&nbsp;Hans Goost,&nbsp;Frank Alexander Schildberg,&nbsp;Christof Burger,&nbsp;Dieter Christian Wirtz,&nbsp;Koroush Kabir,&nbsp;Kristian Welle","doi":"10.1055/a-1522-9087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the course of the corona pandemic, resource conservation and the protection of further infections have made it necessary to break new ground in the organisation of orthopaedic and trauma surgery consultations. One solution is consistent digitisation and the offer of video consultation hours. In this study, non-contact examination of patients with shoulder disorders is described and critically examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients who presented with pathologies of the shoulder joint in a university outpatient clinic were subjected to a physical examination in a conventional and contactless manner. The data obtained on mobility, function and provocation test of both examinations were compared to draw conclusions about the virtual feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>46% of the patients suffered from a traumatic shoulder lesion, and 54% showed degenerative lesions. The assessment of mobility showed a high correlation of 70 - 90% between the two examinations. Common tests to evaluate the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis and the long head of the biceps could be adequately performed in a contactless version by more than three quarters of the patients, but with low-to-moderate performance values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contact-less examination is particularly disadvantageous when evaluating stability criteria. For the medical history and functional test, there were no significant differences between the classic consultation and contactless consultation. Although virtual consultation is a widespread and valuable addition in pandemic times, it cannot replace a safe assessment and indication by personal examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":51219,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","volume":"161 2","pages":"195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1522-9087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In the course of the corona pandemic, resource conservation and the protection of further infections have made it necessary to break new ground in the organisation of orthopaedic and trauma surgery consultations. One solution is consistent digitisation and the offer of video consultation hours. In this study, non-contact examination of patients with shoulder disorders is described and critically examined.

Methods: Thirty patients who presented with pathologies of the shoulder joint in a university outpatient clinic were subjected to a physical examination in a conventional and contactless manner. The data obtained on mobility, function and provocation test of both examinations were compared to draw conclusions about the virtual feasibility.

Results: 46% of the patients suffered from a traumatic shoulder lesion, and 54% showed degenerative lesions. The assessment of mobility showed a high correlation of 70 - 90% between the two examinations. Common tests to evaluate the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis and the long head of the biceps could be adequately performed in a contactless version by more than three quarters of the patients, but with low-to-moderate performance values.

Conclusion: Contact-less examination is particularly disadvantageous when evaluating stability criteria. For the medical history and functional test, there were no significant differences between the classic consultation and contactless consultation. Although virtual consultation is a widespread and valuable addition in pandemic times, it cannot replace a safe assessment and indication by personal examination.

评估肩关节的虚拟咨询的实用性。
目的:在冠状病毒大流行期间,为了节约资源和防止进一步感染,有必要在组织骨科和创伤外科会诊方面开辟新的领域。一个解决方案是持续的数字化和提供视频咨询时间。在这项研究中,对肩部疾病患者的非接触检查进行了描述和严格检查。方法:对30例在某大学门诊就诊的肩关节病变患者进行常规非接触体检。通过对两种测试的运动能力、功能和激发测试数据进行比较,得出虚拟可行性的结论。结果:46%的患者出现外伤性肩关节病变,54%的患者出现退行性病变。活动能力的评估显示两种检查之间的高度相关性为70 - 90%。评估冈上肌、冈下肌、肩胛下肌和二头肌长头的常规测试,超过四分之三的患者可以在非接触式版本中充分进行,但性能值低至中等。结论:在评价稳定性标准时,非接触检查尤其不利。在病史和功能检查方面,经典会诊与非接触式会诊之间无显著差异。虽然虚拟咨询在大流行时期是一种广泛而有价值的补充,但它不能取代安全的评估和亲自检查的指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Das Forum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aus einer Hand Aktuelles aus Klinik, Wissenschaft und Forschung Ein unabhängiges Peer-Review-Verfahren sichert Qualität, Relevanz und Plausibilität der Daten Modernes Layout: Klare Gliederung, farbige Abbildungen, strukturierte Tabellen Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aktuell: Berichte und Reportagen zu den wichtigsten Themen im Fach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信