The Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Angle in MRI: Impact of the Articular Cartilage in the Estimated Inclination of the Inferior Glenoid.

Rodrigo de Marinis, Julio J Contreras, Catalina Vidal, Cristóbal Palma, Manuela Angulo, Alfonso Valenzuela, Ricardo Jaña, Claudio Calvo, Rodrigo Liendo, Francisco Soza
{"title":"The Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Angle in MRI: Impact of the Articular Cartilage in the Estimated Inclination of the Inferior Glenoid.","authors":"Rodrigo de Marinis,&nbsp;Julio J Contreras,&nbsp;Catalina Vidal,&nbsp;Cristóbal Palma,&nbsp;Manuela Angulo,&nbsp;Alfonso Valenzuela,&nbsp;Ricardo Jaña,&nbsp;Claudio Calvo,&nbsp;Rodrigo Liendo,&nbsp;Francisco Soza","doi":"10.1177/24715492231167110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the angle formed using bony landmarks (Bony RSA angle or B-RSA angle) with another angle formed using the cartilage margin as reference (Cartilage RSA angle or C-RSA angle).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with a shoulder MRI obtained in our hospital between July 2020 and July 2021 were included. The C-RSA angle and B-RSA angle were measured. All images were independently assessed by 4 evaluators. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for the B-RSA and C-RSA to evaluate interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (17-77). C-RSA angle was significantly higher than B-RSA (25.4° ± 0.7 vs 19.5° ± 0.7, respectively) with a <i>P-value <.001</i>. The overall agreement was considered \"good\" for C-RSA (ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]) and \"excellent\" for B-RSA angle (ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>C-RSA angle is significantly higher than B-RSA angle. In cases without significant glenoid wear neglecting to account for the remaining articular cartilage at the inferior glenoid margin may result in superior inclination of standard surgical guides.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/6f/10.1177_24715492231167110.PMC10064160.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the angle formed using bony landmarks (Bony RSA angle or B-RSA angle) with another angle formed using the cartilage margin as reference (Cartilage RSA angle or C-RSA angle).

Methods: Adult patients with a shoulder MRI obtained in our hospital between July 2020 and July 2021 were included. The C-RSA angle and B-RSA angle were measured. All images were independently assessed by 4 evaluators. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for the B-RSA and C-RSA to evaluate interobserver agreement.

Results: A total of 61 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (17-77). C-RSA angle was significantly higher than B-RSA (25.4° ± 0.7 vs 19.5° ± 0.7, respectively) with a P-value <.001. The overall agreement was considered "good" for C-RSA (ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]) and "excellent" for B-RSA angle (ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85]).

Conclusions: C-RSA angle is significantly higher than B-RSA angle. In cases without significant glenoid wear neglecting to account for the remaining articular cartilage at the inferior glenoid margin may result in superior inclination of standard surgical guides.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

反肩关节置换术的MRI角度:关节软骨对估计下盂关节倾角的影响。
目的:描述磁共振成像(MRI)中的反向肩关节置换术角度(RSA角),并将以骨标记(bone RSA角或B-RSA角)形成的角度与以软骨缘为参照(软骨RSA角或C-RSA角)形成的角度进行比较。方法:纳入2020年7月至2021年7月在我院接受肩部MRI检查的成年患者。测量C-RSA角和B-RSA角。所有图像由4位评估者独立评估。通过测定B-RSA和C-RSA的类内相关系数(ICC)来评价观察者间的一致性。结果:共纳入61例患者,中位年龄59岁(17-77岁)。C-RSA角度显著高于B-RSA(分别为25.4°±0.7和19.5°±0.7),p值显著高于B-RSA。C-RSA角度总体一致性为“良好”(ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]), B-RSA角度总体一致性为“优秀”(ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85])。结论:C-RSA角明显高于B-RSA角。在没有明显肩胛磨损的情况下,忽略肩胛下缘剩余的关节软骨可能会导致标准手术指南的倾斜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信