Predicting Difficult Intubation by using Modified Mallampati (MMT) with or without Thyromental Height Test (TMHT).

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2023-04-01
A K Azad, D Banik, A F Hoque, M A Kader, L Ray, M A Hannan, M M Rahman, M I Shah, S U Siddique, M M Haque, M L Mariom, A S Jahan, M S Hossain, M Masud
{"title":"Predicting Difficult Intubation by using Modified Mallampati (MMT) with or without Thyromental Height Test (TMHT).","authors":"A K Azad,&nbsp;D Banik,&nbsp;A F Hoque,&nbsp;M A Kader,&nbsp;L Ray,&nbsp;M A Hannan,&nbsp;M M Rahman,&nbsp;M I Shah,&nbsp;S U Siddique,&nbsp;M M Haque,&nbsp;M L Mariom,&nbsp;A S Jahan,&nbsp;M S Hossain,&nbsp;M Masud","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Failed Tracheal Intubation with Subsequent inability to maintain an open airway and adequate oxygenation is the most frequent cause of brain damage or death during anesthesia. Recognizing before anesthesia the potential for difficult intubation allows time for optimal preparation. Proper Selection of equipment and techniques is needed to avoid unwanted situation. To find out difficulties associated with endotracheal intubation using Modified Mallampati Test (MMT) combined with Thyromental Height Test (TMHT) and MMT without TMHT. This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesia in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from April 2018 to September 2018. Two hundred two patients with different surgical procedures under general anaesthesia in different operation theaters of BSMMU, Dhaka were selected as study population. After taking written consents from each patient or his/her attendant elaborate history of illness, meticulous clinical examinations were performed and relevant laboratory investigations were done. All information was recorded in a preformed data sheet and statistical analysis was done by SPSS-22.0. Mean age ±SD of the study subjects was 42.49±14.29 years in MMT with TMHT group and 43.40±15.39 years in MMT without TMHT group. Females were enrolled more than males in both the groups. BMI was 28.75±3.59kg/m² in MMT with TMHT group and 29.44±8.64kg/m² in MMT without TMHT group. There were no significant differences in age, gender and BMI between the groups. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 100.0%, 96.0%, 96.2%, 100.0% and 98.0% respectively of MMT with TMHT in predicting intubation difficulty. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 100.0%, 96.0%, 96.2%, 100.0% and 98.0% respectively of MMT only in predicting intubation difficulty. MMT combined with TMHT is a better predictor of intubation difficulty than MMT alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":18959,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"32 2","pages":"534-541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failed Tracheal Intubation with Subsequent inability to maintain an open airway and adequate oxygenation is the most frequent cause of brain damage or death during anesthesia. Recognizing before anesthesia the potential for difficult intubation allows time for optimal preparation. Proper Selection of equipment and techniques is needed to avoid unwanted situation. To find out difficulties associated with endotracheal intubation using Modified Mallampati Test (MMT) combined with Thyromental Height Test (TMHT) and MMT without TMHT. This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesia in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from April 2018 to September 2018. Two hundred two patients with different surgical procedures under general anaesthesia in different operation theaters of BSMMU, Dhaka were selected as study population. After taking written consents from each patient or his/her attendant elaborate history of illness, meticulous clinical examinations were performed and relevant laboratory investigations were done. All information was recorded in a preformed data sheet and statistical analysis was done by SPSS-22.0. Mean age ±SD of the study subjects was 42.49±14.29 years in MMT with TMHT group and 43.40±15.39 years in MMT without TMHT group. Females were enrolled more than males in both the groups. BMI was 28.75±3.59kg/m² in MMT with TMHT group and 29.44±8.64kg/m² in MMT without TMHT group. There were no significant differences in age, gender and BMI between the groups. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 100.0%, 96.0%, 96.2%, 100.0% and 98.0% respectively of MMT with TMHT in predicting intubation difficulty. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 100.0%, 96.0%, 96.2%, 100.0% and 98.0% respectively of MMT only in predicting intubation difficulty. MMT combined with TMHT is a better predictor of intubation difficulty than MMT alone.

改良Mallampati (MMT)伴或不伴甲状腺高度测试(TMHT)预测插管困难。
气管插管失败,随后无法维持气道开放和充足的氧合,是麻醉期间脑损伤或死亡的最常见原因。在麻醉前认识到插管困难的可能性,以便有时间进行最佳准备。需要正确选择设备和技术,以避免不必要的情况。探讨改良Mallampati试验(MMT)联合甲状腺高度试验(TMHT)及不联合甲状腺高度试验(MMT)气管插管的困难。这项前瞻性观察性研究于2018年4月至2018年9月在孟加拉国达卡的Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学(BSMMU)麻醉科进行。选择在达卡BSMMU不同手术室接受不同手术方式全麻麻醉的200例患者作为研究人群。在获得每位患者或其护理人员的书面同意后,详细说明病史,进行细致的临床检查和相关的实验室调查。所有信息记录在预先制作的数据表中,使用SPSS-22.0软件进行统计分析。MMT合并TMHT组的平均年龄±SD为42.49±14.29岁,MMT不合并TMHT组的平均年龄为43.40±15.39岁。在这两组中,女性的入学率都高于男性。MMT合并TMHT组BMI为28.75±3.59kg/m²,MMT不合并TMHT组BMI为29.44±8.64kg/m²。两组之间的年龄、性别和体重指数没有显著差异。MMT联合TMHT预测插管困难的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和准确性分别为100.0%、96.0%、96.2%、100.0%和98.0%。MMT预测插管困难的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和准确性分别为100.0%、96.0%、96.2%、100.0%和98.0%。MMT联合TMHT比单独MMT更能预测插管困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信