How resources affect management of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur: perspectives from Israel, South Sudan, and South Africa.

Brian P Bernstein, Gurion Rivkin, Yoram A Weil, Alexander Greenberg, Brian B Madison, Mapour M Areu, Omojowk B Joda, Kirsty Leigh Berry, Marc Nortje
{"title":"How resources affect management of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur: perspectives from Israel, South Sudan, and South Africa.","authors":"Brian P Bernstein,&nbsp;Gurion Rivkin,&nbsp;Yoram A Weil,&nbsp;Alexander Greenberg,&nbsp;Brian B Madison,&nbsp;Mapour M Areu,&nbsp;Omojowk B Joda,&nbsp;Kirsty Leigh Berry,&nbsp;Marc Nortje","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur have significant morbidity in both total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA, respectively). The incidence of these fractures is growing, with the predominant mechanism of injury being a fall from a standing height and therefore considered fragility fractures. In many countries, improved public funding and a flourishing private health care sector, when coupled with increased life expectancy, translates to more older patients receiving both TKA and THA and therefore an increased prevalence of periprosthetic fractures and their associated complications. These fractures may occur below a long stem THA, above a TKA, or between the two (so-called \"interprosthetic fracture\"). We will outline fracture classification, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment options, highlighting perspectives on treating these fractures in Israel, South Africa, and South Sudan. These countries represent differing access to resources, varied comorbidity factors, and differing health care systems. The points of difference and the points of similarity will be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 1 Suppl","pages":"e238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e0/30/oi9-6-e238.PMC10064638.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur have significant morbidity in both total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA, respectively). The incidence of these fractures is growing, with the predominant mechanism of injury being a fall from a standing height and therefore considered fragility fractures. In many countries, improved public funding and a flourishing private health care sector, when coupled with increased life expectancy, translates to more older patients receiving both TKA and THA and therefore an increased prevalence of periprosthetic fractures and their associated complications. These fractures may occur below a long stem THA, above a TKA, or between the two (so-called "interprosthetic fracture"). We will outline fracture classification, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment options, highlighting perspectives on treating these fractures in Israel, South Africa, and South Sudan. These countries represent differing access to resources, varied comorbidity factors, and differing health care systems. The points of difference and the points of similarity will be considered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

资源如何影响股骨远端假体周围骨折的治疗:来自以色列、南苏丹和南非的观点。
股骨远端假体周围骨折在全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术(分别为THA和TKA)中都有显著的发病率。这些骨折的发生率正在增加,主要的损伤机制是从站立高度坠落,因此被认为是脆性骨折。在许多国家,公共资金的改善和私营卫生保健部门的蓬勃发展,再加上预期寿命的延长,导致更多老年患者同时接受全髋关节置换术和全髋关节置换术,因此假体周围骨折及其相关并发症的发病率增加。这些骨折可能发生在长柄THA下方,TKA上方,或两者之间(所谓的“假体间骨折”)。我们将概述骨折的分类、危险因素、诊断和治疗方案,重点介绍以色列、南非和南苏丹治疗这些骨折的观点。这些国家代表着不同的资源获取、不同的合并症因素和不同的卫生保健系统。不同点和相似点将被考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信