COVID-19 Infection Risk Among Previously Uninfected Adults: Development of a Prognostic Model.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Richard Sloane, Carl F Pieper, Richard Faldowski, Douglas Wixted, Coralei E Neighbors, Christopher W Woods, L Kristin Newby
{"title":"COVID-19 Infection Risk Among Previously Uninfected Adults: Development of a Prognostic Model.","authors":"Richard Sloane,&nbsp;Carl F Pieper,&nbsp;Richard Faldowski,&nbsp;Douglas Wixted,&nbsp;Coralei E Neighbors,&nbsp;Christopher W Woods,&nbsp;L Kristin Newby","doi":"10.1177/23333928231154336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few models exist that incorporate measures from an array of individual characteristics to predict the risk of COVID-19 infection in the general population. The aim was to develop a prognostic model for COVID-19 using readily obtainable clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 74 weeks surveys were periodically administered to a cohort of 1381 participants previously uninfected with COVID-19 (June 2020 to December 2021). Candidate predictors of incident infection during follow-up included demographics, living situation, financial status, physical activity, health conditions, flu vaccination history, COVID-19 vaccine intention, work/employment status, and use of COVID-19 mitigation behaviors. The final logistic regression model was created using a penalized regression method known as the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Internal validation was performed via bootstrapping, and results were adjusted for overoptimism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1381 participants, 154 (11.2%) had an incident COVID-19 infection during the follow-up period. The final model included six variables: health insurance, race, household size, and the frequency of practicing three mitigation behavior (working at home, avoiding high-risk situations, and using facemasks). The c-statistic of the final model was 0.631 (0.617 after bootstrapped optimism-correction). A calibration plot suggested that with this sample the model shows modest concordance with incident infection at the lowest risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This prognostic model can help identify which community-dwelling older adults are at the highest risk for incident COVID-19 infection and may inform medical provider counseling of their patients about the risk of incident COVID-19 infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"10 ","pages":"23333928231154336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/3f/10.1177_23333928231154336.PMC10052611.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928231154336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few models exist that incorporate measures from an array of individual characteristics to predict the risk of COVID-19 infection in the general population. The aim was to develop a prognostic model for COVID-19 using readily obtainable clinical variables.

Methods: Over 74 weeks surveys were periodically administered to a cohort of 1381 participants previously uninfected with COVID-19 (June 2020 to December 2021). Candidate predictors of incident infection during follow-up included demographics, living situation, financial status, physical activity, health conditions, flu vaccination history, COVID-19 vaccine intention, work/employment status, and use of COVID-19 mitigation behaviors. The final logistic regression model was created using a penalized regression method known as the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Internal validation was performed via bootstrapping, and results were adjusted for overoptimism.

Results: Of the 1381 participants, 154 (11.2%) had an incident COVID-19 infection during the follow-up period. The final model included six variables: health insurance, race, household size, and the frequency of practicing three mitigation behavior (working at home, avoiding high-risk situations, and using facemasks). The c-statistic of the final model was 0.631 (0.617 after bootstrapped optimism-correction). A calibration plot suggested that with this sample the model shows modest concordance with incident infection at the lowest risk.

Conclusion: This prognostic model can help identify which community-dwelling older adults are at the highest risk for incident COVID-19 infection and may inform medical provider counseling of their patients about the risk of incident COVID-19 infection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

未感染成人的COVID-19感染风险:预后模型的建立
背景:目前很少有模型结合一系列个体特征来预测普通人群中COVID-19感染的风险。目的是利用易于获得的临床变量开发COVID-19的预后模型。方法:对1381名先前未感染COVID-19的参与者(2020年6月至2021年12月)进行为期74周的定期调查。随访期间事件感染的候选预测因子包括人口统计学、生活状况、经济状况、身体活动、健康状况、流感疫苗接种史、COVID-19疫苗接种意向、工作/就业状况以及COVID-19缓解行为的使用。最后的逻辑回归模型是使用被称为最小绝对收缩和选择算子的惩罚回归方法创建的。通过判别和校准来评估模型的性能。通过引导进行内部验证,并对结果进行了过度乐观调整。结果:在1381名参与者中,154名(11.2%)在随访期间发生了COVID-19感染事件。最终的模型包括六个变量:健康保险、种族、家庭规模和实践三种缓解行为(在家工作、避免高风险情况和使用口罩)的频率。最终模型的c统计量为0.631(自举乐观修正后为0.617)。校准图表明,该样本模型在最低风险下与事件感染适度一致。结论:该预后模型可帮助识别社区居住老年人发生COVID-19感染的最高风险,并可为医疗服务提供者提供有关患者发生COVID-19感染风险的咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信