Clinical protocol selection for alveolar ridge augmentation at sites exhibiting slight, moderate, and severe horizontal ridge deficiencies

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sarah M. Vargas, Thomas M. Johnson, Aaron S. Pfaff, April P. Bumpers, Jennah C. Wagner, Joseph K. Retrum, Aaron N. Colamarino, Megan E. Bunting, James P. Wilson, Carsen R. McDaniel, Robert W. Herold, Brian W. Stancoven, Adam R. Lincicum
{"title":"Clinical protocol selection for alveolar ridge augmentation at sites exhibiting slight, moderate, and severe horizontal ridge deficiencies","authors":"Sarah M. Vargas,&nbsp;Thomas M. Johnson,&nbsp;Aaron S. Pfaff,&nbsp;April P. Bumpers,&nbsp;Jennah C. Wagner,&nbsp;Joseph K. Retrum,&nbsp;Aaron N. Colamarino,&nbsp;Megan E. Bunting,&nbsp;James P. Wilson,&nbsp;Carsen R. McDaniel,&nbsp;Robert W. Herold,&nbsp;Brian W. Stancoven,&nbsp;Adam R. Lincicum","doi":"10.1002/cap.10239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Focused clinical question</h3>\n \n <p>What factors identify the optimal bone augmentation techniques for managing slight, moderate, and severe horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency (ARD) at dental implant sites?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Horizontal ARD is a concern at a high proportion of sites receiving dental implants, and clinicians have developed a variety of surgical procedures to address such defects. In a particular case, selection of the optimal treatment may depend predominantly on defect severity, location (anterior versus posterior), and configuration (contained versus noncontained). This report provides a framework for selecting an augmentation method when presented with a slight, moderate, or severe horizontal ARD at a site requiring dental implant placement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple treatment options are available for planned implant sites exhibiting horizontal ARD; severe posterior and slight anterior defects intuitively call for different approaches. Although rigid guidelines for selecting the optimal augmentation method do not exist, some techniques are poorly suited for esthetically demanding sites. A framework considering defect severity, location, and configuration may help guide clinical decisions on this topic.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":"13 3","pages":"174-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cap.10239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Focused clinical question

What factors identify the optimal bone augmentation techniques for managing slight, moderate, and severe horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency (ARD) at dental implant sites?

Summary

Horizontal ARD is a concern at a high proportion of sites receiving dental implants, and clinicians have developed a variety of surgical procedures to address such defects. In a particular case, selection of the optimal treatment may depend predominantly on defect severity, location (anterior versus posterior), and configuration (contained versus noncontained). This report provides a framework for selecting an augmentation method when presented with a slight, moderate, or severe horizontal ARD at a site requiring dental implant placement.

Conclusion

Multiple treatment options are available for planned implant sites exhibiting horizontal ARD; severe posterior and slight anterior defects intuitively call for different approaches. Although rigid guidelines for selecting the optimal augmentation method do not exist, some techniques are poorly suited for esthetically demanding sites. A framework considering defect severity, location, and configuration may help guide clinical decisions on this topic.

轻度、中度和重度水平嵴缺损部位牙槽嵴隆凸的临床方案选择。
重点临床问题:哪些因素确定了治疗种植牙部位轻度、中度和重度水平牙槽嵴缺损(ARD)的最佳骨增强技术?总结:在接受牙科植入的大部分部位,水平ARD是一个令人担忧的问题,临床医生已经开发了各种手术程序来解决这些缺陷。在特定情况下,最佳治疗的选择可能主要取决于缺陷的严重程度、位置(前部与后部)和配置(包含与非包含)。本报告提供了一个框架,用于在需要种植牙的部位出现轻度、中度或重度水平ARD时选择增强方法。结论:对于显示水平ARD的计划植入部位,有多种治疗方案可供选择;严重的后部和轻微的前部缺陷直观地要求不同的方法。尽管目前还没有选择最佳扩增方法的严格指南,但一些技术不太适合美容要求高的部位。考虑缺陷严重程度、位置和配置的框架可能有助于指导该主题的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信