Financial, Occupational and Physical Challenges and Blood Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jacob Marvin, Nicolette Powe
{"title":"Financial, Occupational and Physical Challenges and Blood Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Jacob Marvin,&nbsp;Nicolette Powe","doi":"10.1177/23333928231154345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood glucose monitoring effects are changing for people living with type 2 diabetes. However, there is a lack of recent data surrounding financial, occupational, or physical stressors that affect the adherence of diabetes self-management practices. This article looks to examine specific financial, physical, and occupational challenges in adherence to blood glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2020 Pre-Pandemic data of adults 18+ were analyzed. These data were used to examine the relationships between insurance coverage, health status, occupation, and self-monitoring of blood glucose levels in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that respondents had a statistically significant association with five variables: prescription drug coverage (in-part or full), occupation status, gender, age, and three race subcategories (non-Hispanic White, Black, and Other-Multiracial) with blood glucose monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study may help certified health education specialists (CHES) and diabetes care and educator specialists (DCES) to better identify which groups of individuals are at highest risk for poor adherence to specific blood glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"10 ","pages":"23333928231154345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/0d/10.1177_23333928231154345.PMC9900652.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928231154345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood glucose monitoring effects are changing for people living with type 2 diabetes. However, there is a lack of recent data surrounding financial, occupational, or physical stressors that affect the adherence of diabetes self-management practices. This article looks to examine specific financial, physical, and occupational challenges in adherence to blood glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2020 Pre-Pandemic data of adults 18+ were analyzed. These data were used to examine the relationships between insurance coverage, health status, occupation, and self-monitoring of blood glucose levels in the United States.

Results: This study found that respondents had a statistically significant association with five variables: prescription drug coverage (in-part or full), occupation status, gender, age, and three race subcategories (non-Hispanic White, Black, and Other-Multiracial) with blood glucose monitoring.

Conclusion: This study may help certified health education specialists (CHES) and diabetes care and educator specialists (DCES) to better identify which groups of individuals are at highest risk for poor adherence to specific blood glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2型糖尿病患者的经济、职业和身体挑战与血糖监测。
背景:血糖监测对2型糖尿病患者的影响正在发生变化。然而,目前缺乏影响糖尿病自我管理实践依从性的财务、职业或身体压力因素的最新数据。本文旨在研究2型糖尿病患者坚持血糖监测的具体经济、身体和职业挑战。方法:分析2017-2020年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)中18岁以上成年人大流行前数据。这些数据被用来检验美国保险覆盖范围、健康状况、职业和自我血糖水平监测之间的关系。结果:本研究发现,受访者与血糖监测的五个变量有统计学显著相关:处方药覆盖率(部分或全部)、职业状况、性别、年龄和三个种族亚类(非西班牙裔白人、黑人和其他多种族)。结论:本研究可以帮助认证健康教育专家(CHES)和糖尿病护理和教育专家(DCES)更好地确定哪组个体在2型糖尿病患者中依从性差的风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信