Agronomic Performance, Plant Morphology, and Nutritive Value Among Three Prairie Bromegrass Entries

Allen S. Hubbard, Jane A. Parish, Bisoondat Macoon, Rhonda C. Vann, Jimmy Ray Parish
{"title":"Agronomic Performance, Plant Morphology, and Nutritive Value Among Three Prairie Bromegrass Entries","authors":"Allen S. Hubbard,&nbsp;Jane A. Parish,&nbsp;Bisoondat Macoon,&nbsp;Rhonda C. Vann,&nbsp;Jimmy Ray Parish","doi":"10.1094/FG-2011-1019-01-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prairie bromegrass (<i>Bromus</i> spp.) is a cool-season perennial bunchgrass with potential as a valuable forage crop in the southeastern USA. This 2-year study, conducted at Mississippi State, MS, compared dry matter production, persistence, plant morphology, and nutritive value of two experimental lines [BP101 (<i>B. parodii</i> Covas &amp; Itria) and BW103 (<i>B. wildenowii</i> Kunth)] and a commercial entry (<i>B. willdenowii</i> Kunth cv. Matua) of prairie bromegrass. No differences in nutritive value (mean crude protein = 128, ADF = 318, NDF = 591, in vitro dry matter digestibility = 644 g/kg, respectively) were seen among entries (<i>P</i> = 0.11). The BP101 line had the least herbage mass (3,790 vs. 6,180 and 5,627 kg/ha, respectively, for Matua and BW103) at the first grazing event in 2006 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05), and did not persist as well as BW103 or Matua (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01) (27.5, 80.0, and 83.8% stand 586 days after establishment for BP101, Matua, and BW103, respectively). Leaf blade, sheath, and reproductive tiller length differences (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.10) suggest variations in physiological traits among bromegrass entries. Neither of the experimental lines of prairie bromegrass outperformed Matua for the traits studied in northern Mississippi.</p>","PeriodicalId":100549,"journal":{"name":"Forage & Grazinglands","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forage & Grazinglands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/FG-2011-1019-01-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prairie bromegrass (Bromus spp.) is a cool-season perennial bunchgrass with potential as a valuable forage crop in the southeastern USA. This 2-year study, conducted at Mississippi State, MS, compared dry matter production, persistence, plant morphology, and nutritive value of two experimental lines [BP101 (B. parodii Covas & Itria) and BW103 (B. wildenowii Kunth)] and a commercial entry (B. willdenowii Kunth cv. Matua) of prairie bromegrass. No differences in nutritive value (mean crude protein = 128, ADF = 318, NDF = 591, in vitro dry matter digestibility = 644 g/kg, respectively) were seen among entries (P = 0.11). The BP101 line had the least herbage mass (3,790 vs. 6,180 and 5,627 kg/ha, respectively, for Matua and BW103) at the first grazing event in 2006 (P < 0.05), and did not persist as well as BW103 or Matua (P < 0.01) (27.5, 80.0, and 83.8% stand 586 days after establishment for BP101, Matua, and BW103, respectively). Leaf blade, sheath, and reproductive tiller length differences (P < 0.10) suggest variations in physiological traits among bromegrass entries. Neither of the experimental lines of prairie bromegrass outperformed Matua for the traits studied in northern Mississippi.

三种草原雀稗的农艺性能、植物形态和营养价值
大草原雀麦草(雀麦草属)是一种冷季多年生束草,在美国东南部具有作为一种有价值的饲料作物的潜力。这项在密西西比州立大学进行的为期2年的研究,比较了两个实验品系[BP101 (B. pardii Covas &Itria)和BW103 (B. wildenwii Kunth)]和商业条目(B. willdenwii Kunth cv)。草原雀稗的一种。各组饲料的营养价值(平均粗蛋白质为128,ADF为318,NDF为591,体外干物质消化率为644 g/kg)无显著差异(P = 0.11)。2006年第一次放牧时,BP101系的牧草质量最少(3790 kg/ha, Matua和BW103分别为6180和5627 kg/ha) (P <0.05),持续时间不如BW103或Matua (P <BP101、Matua和BW103分别在培养后586 d为27.5、80.0和83.8%)。叶片、鞘和生殖分蘖长度差异(P <0.10)表明不同雀稗的生理性状存在差异。在密西西比州北部所研究的性状方面,两种草原雀稗的试验品系都没有优于Matua。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信