Primary Thyroid Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma (MEC) Is Clinically, Prognostically, and Molecularly Different from Sclerosing MEC with Eosinophilia: A Multicenter and Integrated Study.

Abstract

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and sclerosing MEC with eosinophilia (SMECE) are rare primary thyroid carcinomas. In this study, we aimed to present our multicenter series of MEC and SMECE and integrated our data with published literature to further investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of these tumors. We found 2 MECs and 4 SMECEs in our multicenter archives. We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to determine the MAML2 gene rearrangement. We screened for mutations in BRAF, TERT promoter, and RAS mutations using Sanger sequencing and digital polymerase chain reaction. Histopathologically, MECs and SMECEs were composed of two main cell types including epidermoid and mucin-secreting cells, arranged in cords, nests, and tubules. SMECEs were characterized by a densely sclerotic stroma with abundant eosinophils. We did not detect any MAML2 fusion in any of our cases. Two MEC cases harbored concomitant BRAF p.V600E and TERT C228T mutations. RAS mutations were absent in all cases. Concurrent foci of another thyroid malignancy were more commonly seen in MECs (p < 0.001), whereas SMECEs were associated with chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (p < 0.001). MECs and SMECEs had equivalent recurrence-free survival (RFS) but MECs conferred significantly dismal disease-specific survival (DSS) as compared to SMECEs (p = 0.007). In conclusion, MECs and SMECEs not only shared some similarities but also demonstrated differences in clinicopathological characteristics, prognoses, and molecular profiles. SMECEs had a superior DSS in comparison to MECs, suggesting that they are low-grade cancers. This could help clinicians better evaluate patient outcomes and decide appropriate treatment plans.