Development and Efficacy of Gasless Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Gynecological Diseases.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Hiroe Ito, Yasufumi Oishi, Yotaro Takaesu, Keiichi Isaka
{"title":"Development and Efficacy of Gasless Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Gynecological Diseases.","authors":"Hiroe Ito,&nbsp;Yasufumi Oishi,&nbsp;Yotaro Takaesu,&nbsp;Keiichi Isaka","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of gasless reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (GRP-LS) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method for gynecological diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included gasless laparoscopic surgeries performed at our hospital between September 1, 1993 and December 31, 2016. The new GRP-LS technique was compared with the conventional gasless three-port laparoscopic surgery (G3P-LS), based on patient background, operative results in patients treated for laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (LC), and laparoscopic salpingectomy (LT). Surgeons of the two techniques were categorized by the number of surgeries they had performed, and the number of surgeons and surgeries for each technique were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GRP-LS was used in 2,338 cases and G3P-LS in 2,473 cases. GRP-LS was used in 980 LM cases, 804 LC cases, 240 LT cases, and 314 cases for other conditions. The operative time required for GRP-LS was significantly less for LM, LC, LT, and the procedure also had less blood loss for LM and LC than G3P-LS. G3P-LS required a transition to open surgery in 0.69% of cases, whereas GRP-LS showed a very low rate of 0.09%. Sixty-seven of the 78 GRP-LS surgeons (85.9%) had performed fewer than 50 GRP-LSs, and these surgeons performed about half of all surgeries. Eighty-three of the 93 GRP-LS surgeons (89.2%) had performed fewer than 50 G3P-LSs, and these surgeons performed 38.9% of all surgeries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GRP-LS is an effective surgery with few complications and less cosmetic damage and can be easily introduced to novice or inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/a5/e2022.00083.PMC10065756.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of gasless reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (GRP-LS) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method for gynecological diseases.

Methods: This study included gasless laparoscopic surgeries performed at our hospital between September 1, 1993 and December 31, 2016. The new GRP-LS technique was compared with the conventional gasless three-port laparoscopic surgery (G3P-LS), based on patient background, operative results in patients treated for laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (LC), and laparoscopic salpingectomy (LT). Surgeons of the two techniques were categorized by the number of surgeries they had performed, and the number of surgeons and surgeries for each technique were compared.

Results: GRP-LS was used in 2,338 cases and G3P-LS in 2,473 cases. GRP-LS was used in 980 LM cases, 804 LC cases, 240 LT cases, and 314 cases for other conditions. The operative time required for GRP-LS was significantly less for LM, LC, LT, and the procedure also had less blood loss for LM and LC than G3P-LS. G3P-LS required a transition to open surgery in 0.69% of cases, whereas GRP-LS showed a very low rate of 0.09%. Sixty-seven of the 78 GRP-LS surgeons (85.9%) had performed fewer than 50 GRP-LSs, and these surgeons performed about half of all surgeries. Eighty-three of the 93 GRP-LS surgeons (89.2%) had performed fewer than 50 G3P-LSs, and these surgeons performed 38.9% of all surgeries.

Conclusions: GRP-LS is an effective surgery with few complications and less cosmetic damage and can be easily introduced to novice or inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

无气腹腹腔镜手术治疗妇科疾病的进展及疗效。
目的:评价腹腔下提腹无气微创腹腔镜手术治疗妇科疾病的疗效。方法:本研究纳入1993年9月1日至2016年12月31日在我院进行的无气腹腹腔镜手术。根据患者背景、腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(LM)、腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术(LC)和腹腔镜输卵管切除术(LT)患者的手术结果,将新型GRP-LS技术与传统的无气三孔腹腔镜手术(G3P-LS)进行比较。根据手术次数对两种技术的外科医生进行分类,并对每种技术的外科医生数量和手术次数进行比较。结果:GRP-LS治疗2338例,G3P-LS治疗2473例。应用GRP-LS治疗LM 980例,LC 804例,LT 240例,其他314例。与G3P-LS相比,GRP-LS的LM、LC、LT所需的手术时间明显更短,LM和LC的失血量也更少。G3P-LS需要过渡到开放手术的病例占0.69%,而GRP-LS的比例非常低,为0.09%。78名GRP-LS外科医生中有67名(85.9%)的GRP-LS手术少于50例,占所有手术的一半左右。93位GRP-LS外科医生中有83位(89.2%)的g3p - ls手术少于50例,占全部手术的38.9%。结论:GRP-LS是一种有效的手术,并发症少,美容损伤小,易于向新手或无经验的腹腔镜外科医生介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信