A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jawad M. Husain , Devin Cromartie , Emma Fitzelle-Jones , Annelise Brochier , Christina P.C. Borba , Cristina Montalvo
{"title":"A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations","authors":"Jawad M. Husain ,&nbsp;Devin Cromartie ,&nbsp;Emma Fitzelle-Jones ,&nbsp;Annelise Brochier ,&nbsp;Christina P.C. Borba ,&nbsp;Cristina Montalvo","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Clinical guidelines strongly recommend opioid agonist </span>treatment (OAT) as first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, racial/ethnic minoritized patients are less likely to receive OAT compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Reasons for this treatment gap must be elucidated to address racial/ethnic disparities in OAT. Our objective is to evaluate perceptions of and barriers to OAT across racial/ethnic groups in individuals with OUD (not on OAT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This qualitative study used semi-structured telephone interviews of adult patients (<em>n</em> = 41) with OUD (not currently being treated with OAT) from the Boston area from September 2020 through February 2021. We developed a codebook through author consensus based on review of themes in initial transcripts. We performed qualitative thematic analysis of the transcripts. We evaluated patients' perceptions of treatment for OUD across the study population and analyzed differences and similarities in perceptions between racial and ethnic groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across all racial/ethnic categories in our sample, anticipated stigma was the most frequently reported barrier to OAT and most patients preferred non-OAT methods for treatment. Non-Hispanic White participants had more favorable opinions of OAT compared to racial/ethnic minoritized participants. Racial/ethnic minoritized participants reported social support as the main facilitator to addiction treatment, while non-Hispanic White participants reported self-motivation as the most important factor. Racial/ethnic minoritized participants preferred treatment for OUD via non-OAT treatments and their second most preferred option was residential treatment. Non-Hispanic White participants preferred naltrexone and their second most preferred option was non-OAT treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>Racial/ethnic minoritized patients' preference for residential treatment and social support, along with their distrust of OAT, illustrates a desire for psychosocial and peer recovery–based care that addresses social determinants of health<span>. Addiction specialists may improve engagement with and treatment of racial/ethnic minoritized groups with culturally tailored interventions for OUD that offer psychosocial treatment in combination with OAT, and by partnering with organizations with strong ties to racial/ethnic minoritized communities. This kind of response would reflect the structural and cultural humility that is needed to adequately address the OUD needs of these </span></span>underserved populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108918"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222002008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical guidelines strongly recommend opioid agonist treatment (OAT) as first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, racial/ethnic minoritized patients are less likely to receive OAT compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Reasons for this treatment gap must be elucidated to address racial/ethnic disparities in OAT. Our objective is to evaluate perceptions of and barriers to OAT across racial/ethnic groups in individuals with OUD (not on OAT).

Methods

This qualitative study used semi-structured telephone interviews of adult patients (n = 41) with OUD (not currently being treated with OAT) from the Boston area from September 2020 through February 2021. We developed a codebook through author consensus based on review of themes in initial transcripts. We performed qualitative thematic analysis of the transcripts. We evaluated patients' perceptions of treatment for OUD across the study population and analyzed differences and similarities in perceptions between racial and ethnic groups.

Results

Across all racial/ethnic categories in our sample, anticipated stigma was the most frequently reported barrier to OAT and most patients preferred non-OAT methods for treatment. Non-Hispanic White participants had more favorable opinions of OAT compared to racial/ethnic minoritized participants. Racial/ethnic minoritized participants reported social support as the main facilitator to addiction treatment, while non-Hispanic White participants reported self-motivation as the most important factor. Racial/ethnic minoritized participants preferred treatment for OUD via non-OAT treatments and their second most preferred option was residential treatment. Non-Hispanic White participants preferred naltrexone and their second most preferred option was non-OAT treatments.

Conclusions

Racial/ethnic minoritized patients' preference for residential treatment and social support, along with their distrust of OAT, illustrates a desire for psychosocial and peer recovery–based care that addresses social determinants of health. Addiction specialists may improve engagement with and treatment of racial/ethnic minoritized groups with culturally tailored interventions for OUD that offer psychosocial treatment in combination with OAT, and by partnering with organizations with strong ties to racial/ethnic minoritized communities. This kind of response would reflect the structural and cultural humility that is needed to adequately address the OUD needs of these underserved populations.

种族/少数民族人群阿片类激动剂治疗障碍的定性分析
临床指南强烈推荐阿片受体激动剂治疗(OAT)作为阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的一线治疗。然而,与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,少数族裔患者接受OAT的可能性较小。必须阐明这种治疗差距的原因,以解决OAT中的种族/民族差异。我们的目的是评估不同种族/民族的OUD患者(非OAT患者)对OAT的认知和障碍。方法:本定性研究采用半结构化电话访谈方法,对2020年9月至2021年2月来自波士顿地区的成年OUD患者(n = 41)(目前未接受OAT治疗)进行访谈。我们开发了一个密码本,通过作者共识的基础上审查的主题在最初的成绩单。我们对转录本进行了定性专题分析。我们评估了整个研究人群中患者对OUD治疗的看法,并分析了种族和民族群体之间看法的异同。结果在我们样本中的所有种族/民族类别中,预期的耻辱是最常见的OAT障碍,大多数患者更倾向于非OAT治疗方法。与种族/少数民族参与者相比,非西班牙裔白人参与者对OAT的看法更有利。种族/少数民族参与者报告社会支持是成瘾治疗的主要促进因素,而非西班牙裔白人参与者报告自我激励是最重要的因素。种族/少数民族的参与者更喜欢通过非oat治疗来治疗OUD,他们的第二首选方案是住院治疗。非西班牙裔白人参与者更喜欢纳曲酮,他们的第二选择是非oat治疗。结论:种族/少数民族患者对住院治疗和社会支持的偏好,以及他们对OAT的不信任,说明了他们对基于社会心理和同伴康复的护理的渴望,这些护理解决了健康的社会决定因素。成瘾专家可以通过为OUD提供与OAT相结合的社会心理治疗的文化量身定制的干预措施,以及与与种族/少数民族社区有密切联系的组织合作,改善与种族/少数民族群体的接触和治疗。这种反应将反映出在结构和文化上的谦逊,这是充分解决这些服务不足人口的OUD需求所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信