Conformance with the ISO 14001 standard—results of gap analyses at selected department of the army installations

James D. Wood, Linda L. Baetz
{"title":"Conformance with the ISO 14001 standard—results of gap analyses at selected department of the army installations","authors":"James D. Wood,&nbsp;Linda L. Baetz","doi":"10.1002/ffej.3330110208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on Department of Defense (DOD) policy guidance, the Department of the Army first adopted its Environmental Audit Program in 1985. Effective October 1991, the Army Environmental Audit Program was revised and redesignated as the Environmental Compliance Assessment System (ECAS) Program. The ECAS audits began to evaluate the installation's overall Environmental Program Management (EPM) and Environmental Management Systems (EMSs). The purpose of the EPM/EMS aspect of ECAS audits was to determine more systematic “root causes” for observed compliance problems. With the adoption of the ISO 14001 standard, the EPM/EMS portion of the ECAS protocol was revised to more closely mirror that standard.</p><p>DOD has initiated a two-year pilot effort to evaluate the feasibility of ISO 14001 implementation at selected DOD installations. This DOD pilot program focuses both on implementation costs and on increased efficiency associated with more effective integration of installation-level EMS.</p><p>In anticipation of a favorable endorsement of the ISO 14001 framework for installation-EMS, several Army installations have begun to perform their own gap analyses to determine their conformance to the various parts of the standard. This article describes the results of EMS audits (gap analyses) at nine Army installations. Major nonconformances observed at each installation and corrective actions are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100523,"journal":{"name":"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal","volume":"11 2","pages":"65-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ffej.3330110208","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffej.3330110208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on Department of Defense (DOD) policy guidance, the Department of the Army first adopted its Environmental Audit Program in 1985. Effective October 1991, the Army Environmental Audit Program was revised and redesignated as the Environmental Compliance Assessment System (ECAS) Program. The ECAS audits began to evaluate the installation's overall Environmental Program Management (EPM) and Environmental Management Systems (EMSs). The purpose of the EPM/EMS aspect of ECAS audits was to determine more systematic “root causes” for observed compliance problems. With the adoption of the ISO 14001 standard, the EPM/EMS portion of the ECAS protocol was revised to more closely mirror that standard.

DOD has initiated a two-year pilot effort to evaluate the feasibility of ISO 14001 implementation at selected DOD installations. This DOD pilot program focuses both on implementation costs and on increased efficiency associated with more effective integration of installation-level EMS.

In anticipation of a favorable endorsement of the ISO 14001 framework for installation-EMS, several Army installations have begun to perform their own gap analyses to determine their conformance to the various parts of the standard. This article describes the results of EMS audits (gap analyses) at nine Army installations. Major nonconformances observed at each installation and corrective actions are also discussed.

符合ISO 14001标准-在选定的军队设施部门进行差距分析的结果
根据国防部(DOD)的政策指导,陆军部于1985年首次采用了环境审计计划。自1991年10月起,陆军环境审计计划被修订并重新命名为环境合规评估系统(ECAS)计划。ECAS审计开始评估该装置的整体环境计划管理(EPM)和环境管理系统(ems)。ECAS审计的EPM/EMS方面的目的是为观察到的合规问题确定更系统的“根本原因”。随着ISO 14001标准的采用,ECAS协议的EPM/EMS部分被修订,以更紧密地反映该标准。国防部已经启动了一项为期两年的试点工作,以评估在选定的国防部设施中实施ISO 14001的可行性。国防部的试点项目既关注实施成本,也关注与安装级EMS更有效集成相关的效率提高。期待ISO 14001框架对安装- ems的有利认可,一些陆军设施已经开始执行他们自己的差距分析,以确定他们是否符合标准的各个部分。本文描述了9个陆军设施的EMS审计(差距分析)结果。还讨论了在每次安装中观察到的主要不符合项和纠正措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信