Changes in Soil Test Phosphorus Levels on a Grazing Farm in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Matt A. Sanderson, Jeffery Gonet, Robert C. Stout
{"title":"Changes in Soil Test Phosphorus Levels on a Grazing Farm in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed","authors":"Matt A. Sanderson,&nbsp;Jeffery Gonet,&nbsp;Robert C. Stout","doi":"10.1094/FG-2011-1128-02-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improved nutrient cycling and reduced soil nutrient accumulation are perceived benefits of management-intensive grazing. Some management-intensive practices, such as increased stocking rates, rapid rotations, and supplemental feeding, could affect the soil through nutrient additions and the concentration of grazing animals. In this case study of a beef cattle farm in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, we compared changes in soil test P levels resulting from a land use change (row crops and hay in the 1980s to management-intensive grazing from 1990 to 2010). Soil test P data from farm records maintained since 1980 were augmented with spatially explicit soil sampling in 1999, 2004, and 2010. Pastures on fields that had historically received manure and were used for corn silage production changed the most in soil test P (median of 132 mg/kg P in 1980 to 70 mg/kg in 2010). Median soil test P in fields used for corn grain production in the 1980s decreased by 30%, fields used for hay production decreased by 26%, and permanent pastures decreased by 17%. The decreases in soil test P may have resulted from less inorganic P imported for use on corn, redistribution of P around the farm, and fixation of P in the soil.</p>","PeriodicalId":100549,"journal":{"name":"Forage & Grazinglands","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forage & Grazinglands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/FG-2011-1128-02-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improved nutrient cycling and reduced soil nutrient accumulation are perceived benefits of management-intensive grazing. Some management-intensive practices, such as increased stocking rates, rapid rotations, and supplemental feeding, could affect the soil through nutrient additions and the concentration of grazing animals. In this case study of a beef cattle farm in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, we compared changes in soil test P levels resulting from a land use change (row crops and hay in the 1980s to management-intensive grazing from 1990 to 2010). Soil test P data from farm records maintained since 1980 were augmented with spatially explicit soil sampling in 1999, 2004, and 2010. Pastures on fields that had historically received manure and were used for corn silage production changed the most in soil test P (median of 132 mg/kg P in 1980 to 70 mg/kg in 2010). Median soil test P in fields used for corn grain production in the 1980s decreased by 30%, fields used for hay production decreased by 26%, and permanent pastures decreased by 17%. The decreases in soil test P may have resulted from less inorganic P imported for use on corn, redistribution of P around the farm, and fixation of P in the soil.

切萨皮克湾流域放牧农场土壤测试磷水平的变化
改善养分循环和减少土壤养分积累是管理集约化放牧的明显好处。一些管理集约化做法,如增加放养率、快速轮作和补充饲养,可以通过添加养分和放牧动物的集中来影响土壤。在这个切萨皮克湾流域肉牛养殖场的案例研究中,我们比较了土地利用变化(20世纪80年代的行作物和干草与1990年至2010年的管理集约化放牧)导致的土壤测试磷水平的变化。通过1999年、2004年和2010年的土壤采样,对1980年以来的农田土壤试验磷数据进行了扩充。在历史上施用粪肥并用于玉米青贮生产的牧场,土壤试验磷变化最大(1980年的中位数为132 mg/kg, 2010年为70 mg/kg)。20世纪80年代玉米田试验磷中值下降30%,干草田试验磷中值下降26%,永久牧场试验磷中值下降17%。土壤试验磷的减少可能是由于进口的用于玉米的无机磷减少,磷在农场周围的重新分配以及磷在土壤中的固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信