Evaluation of Various Pre-emergent and Post-emergent Herbicides on Five Summer Legumes

Twain J. Butler, Jeremy J. Pittman, Sindy M. Interrante
{"title":"Evaluation of Various Pre-emergent and Post-emergent Herbicides on Five Summer Legumes","authors":"Twain J. Butler,&nbsp;Jeremy J. Pittman,&nbsp;Sindy M. Interrante","doi":"10.1094/FG-2011-0819-01-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Currently there is little information regarding weed control in legumes; therefore, the effects of 16 pre-emergent and 12 post-emergent herbicide treatments were evaluated on five summer legumes during the 2005, 2006, and 2007 seasons. Pre-emergent herbicides generally did not improve legume yield, except for imazethapyr (Pursuit/Newpath) on Korean lespedeza. Post-emergent application of 2,4-DB (Butryrac) provided 94 to 97% control of woolly croton (<i>Croton capitatus</i> Michx.) but no control of pigweed (<i>Amaranthus</i> sp.), and it caused excessive injury to these legumes, except for Korean lespedeza. Fluazifop (Fusilade), sethoxydim (PoastPlus), and clethodim (Select) applied post-emergent provided the greatest large crabgrass [<i>Digitaria sanguinalis</i> (L.) Scop] control (91, 91, and 94%, respectively) and did not injure any of the legumes. Imazethapyr and imazamox (Raptor) provided moderate (63 to 72%) woolly croton control with little legume injury. Imazapic (Plateau/Impose) and imazapic-glyphosate (Journey) produced moderate visual injury ratings for all forage legume species (17 to 32%) and provided good woolly croton control (82%) and moderate large crabgrass (43 to 59%) and pigweed (45%) control. Therefore, imazethapyr, imazamox, and imazapic have the greatest potential for improving yield and quality of these summer legumes.</p>","PeriodicalId":100549,"journal":{"name":"Forage & Grazinglands","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forage & Grazinglands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/FG-2011-0819-01-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Currently there is little information regarding weed control in legumes; therefore, the effects of 16 pre-emergent and 12 post-emergent herbicide treatments were evaluated on five summer legumes during the 2005, 2006, and 2007 seasons. Pre-emergent herbicides generally did not improve legume yield, except for imazethapyr (Pursuit/Newpath) on Korean lespedeza. Post-emergent application of 2,4-DB (Butryrac) provided 94 to 97% control of woolly croton (Croton capitatus Michx.) but no control of pigweed (Amaranthus sp.), and it caused excessive injury to these legumes, except for Korean lespedeza. Fluazifop (Fusilade), sethoxydim (PoastPlus), and clethodim (Select) applied post-emergent provided the greatest large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop] control (91, 91, and 94%, respectively) and did not injure any of the legumes. Imazethapyr and imazamox (Raptor) provided moderate (63 to 72%) woolly croton control with little legume injury. Imazapic (Plateau/Impose) and imazapic-glyphosate (Journey) produced moderate visual injury ratings for all forage legume species (17 to 32%) and provided good woolly croton control (82%) and moderate large crabgrass (43 to 59%) and pigweed (45%) control. Therefore, imazethapyr, imazamox, and imazapic have the greatest potential for improving yield and quality of these summer legumes.

5种夏季豆科植物苗期前后除草剂的效果评价
目前关于豆科植物杂草控制的信息很少;在2005年、2006年和2007年对5种夏季豆科作物进行了16种出苗前和12种出苗后除草剂处理的效果评价。苗期前除草剂对豆科植物的产量没有显著的提高作用,但对韩式胡子有显著的增产作用。事后施用2,4- db (Butryrac)对毛豆(croton capitatus Michx.)的防治效果为94 ~ 97%,但对藜草(Amaranthus sp.)的防治效果不明显,除胡椒子外,对其他豆科植物的危害较大。苗期后应用氟唑吡酯(Fusilade)、聚乙氧啶(PoastPlus)和clethodim (Select)提供了最大的大杂草[Digitaria sanguinalis (L.)]。(分别为91%、91%和94%),没有伤害任何豆科植物。Imazethapyr和imazamox (Raptor)具有中度(63% ~ 72%)的防治效果,对豆科植物的伤害较小。Imazapic (Plateau/Impose)和Imazapic -草甘膦(Journey)对所有饲草类豆科植物的视觉伤害评分为中等(17% - 32%),对棉质巴豆(82%)和大杂草(43% - 59%)和藜草(45%)具有良好的控制效果。因此,imazethapyr、imazamox和imazapic在提高夏季豆科作物产量和品质方面具有最大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信