Effects of Acquisition Matrix Size on the Accuracy and Repeatability of Parameters of Left Ventricular Function: A Phantom Study for ECG-gated Myocardial SPECT.

Denis Gersdorf, Franziska Rambow, Reiner Weise, Ivayla Apostolova, Yuske Kobayashi, Jin Yamamura, Kristian Tecklenburg, Zsofia Zsebe, Susanne Klutmann, Kenichi Nakajima, Janos Mester
{"title":"Effects of Acquisition Matrix Size on the Accuracy and Repeatability of Parameters of Left Ventricular Function: A Phantom Study for ECG-gated Myocardial SPECT.","authors":"Denis Gersdorf,&nbsp;Franziska Rambow,&nbsp;Reiner Weise,&nbsp;Ivayla Apostolova,&nbsp;Yuske Kobayashi,&nbsp;Jin Yamamura,&nbsp;Kristian Tecklenburg,&nbsp;Zsofia Zsebe,&nbsp;Susanne Klutmann,&nbsp;Kenichi Nakajima,&nbsp;Janos Mester","doi":"10.17996/anc.21-00140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: The voxel size in ECG-gated myocardial SPECT (GSPECT) is a compromise between geometric resolution and count statistics with varying values and is rather inconsistent in different centers. We investigated the influence of typical acquisition matrix sizes for GSPECT on the reproducibility and accuracy of left ventricular function parameters using a dynamic heart phantom. <i>Methods</i>: Ten paired acquisitions, each pair with slightly different phantom positions, were obtained using identical imaging parameters except acquisition matrix: 128 × 128 matrix (3.3 mm voxel) and 64 × 64 matrix (6.6 mm voxel). In the next step, 128 × 128 data sets were compressed to an additional set of 64 × 64 matrix images. <i>Results</i>: Nominal value of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the phantom was 67%. Both acquisition matrices led to significant overestimation of the LVEF. Overestimation was more pronounced in 64 × 64 than in 128 × 128 studies (79.8 ± 2.5% vs. 73.6 ± 1.4%, p<0.05). Calculated volumes were closer to the nominal values with 128 × 128 than with 64 × 64 studies. Variance showed a trend to be higher with 64 × 64 matrix, but the effect did not reach the level of statistical significance. <i>Conclusions</i>: LVEF overestimation and volume underestimation can be reduced by using finer matrix size without any negative effect on the reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":72228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","volume":"7 1","pages":"43-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040942/pdf/anc-7-43.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.21-00140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The voxel size in ECG-gated myocardial SPECT (GSPECT) is a compromise between geometric resolution and count statistics with varying values and is rather inconsistent in different centers. We investigated the influence of typical acquisition matrix sizes for GSPECT on the reproducibility and accuracy of left ventricular function parameters using a dynamic heart phantom. Methods: Ten paired acquisitions, each pair with slightly different phantom positions, were obtained using identical imaging parameters except acquisition matrix: 128 × 128 matrix (3.3 mm voxel) and 64 × 64 matrix (6.6 mm voxel). In the next step, 128 × 128 data sets were compressed to an additional set of 64 × 64 matrix images. Results: Nominal value of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the phantom was 67%. Both acquisition matrices led to significant overestimation of the LVEF. Overestimation was more pronounced in 64 × 64 than in 128 × 128 studies (79.8 ± 2.5% vs. 73.6 ± 1.4%, p<0.05). Calculated volumes were closer to the nominal values with 128 × 128 than with 64 × 64 studies. Variance showed a trend to be higher with 64 × 64 matrix, but the effect did not reach the level of statistical significance. Conclusions: LVEF overestimation and volume underestimation can be reduced by using finer matrix size without any negative effect on the reproducibility.

采集矩阵大小对左心室功能参数准确性和重复性的影响:心电图门控心肌SPECT的幻像研究。
背景:心电图门控心肌SPECT (GSPECT)的体素大小是几何分辨率和计数统计值之间的折衷,不同中心的体素大小不一致。我们研究了GSPECT典型采集矩阵大小对动态心脏幻影左心室功能参数再现性和准确性的影响。方法:除采集矩阵为128 × 128矩阵(3.3 mm体素)和64 × 64矩阵(6.6 mm体素)外,采用相同的成像参数获得10对图像,每对图像的幻像位置略有不同。在下一步中,128 × 128的数据集被压缩为额外的64 × 64矩阵图像集。结果:左心室射血分数(LVEF)标称值为67%。两种获取矩阵都导致了对LVEF的严重高估。与128 × 128研究相比,64 × 64研究的高估更为明显(79.8±2.5% vs. 73.6±1.4%)。结论:使用更细的基质尺寸可以减少LVEF的高估和体积低估,而不会对再现性产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书