{"title":"Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Myocardial Flow Reserve Versus Pressure-wire Based Assessment: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Osamu Manabe, Tadao Aikawa, Masanao Naya, Shiro Miura, Noriko Oyama-Manabe","doi":"10.17996/anc.21-00144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positron emission tomography (PET) permits the noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF). Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), calculated by dividing stress MBF by rest MBF is a reliable index for the functional information of coronary artery disease. A pressure-derived physiological index, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) is also an important measurement. Both MFR and FFR values are used to evaluate coronary physiology; however, but they are not interchangeable because each test has certain discrepancies. In this systematic review, we provide an overview of coronary physiology with PET compared to pressure-derived physiological indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":72228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","volume":"7 1","pages":"57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040938/pdf/anc-7-57.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.21-00144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) permits the noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF). Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), calculated by dividing stress MBF by rest MBF is a reliable index for the functional information of coronary artery disease. A pressure-derived physiological index, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) is also an important measurement. Both MFR and FFR values are used to evaluate coronary physiology; however, but they are not interchangeable because each test has certain discrepancies. In this systematic review, we provide an overview of coronary physiology with PET compared to pressure-derived physiological indices.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
