Tracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring: Assessing current practice in critically ill patients at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital.

A B Khan, K Thandrayen, S Omar
{"title":"Tracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring: Assessing current practice in critically ill patients at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital.","authors":"A B Khan, K Thandrayen, S Omar","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1.373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intubated patients with a high tracheal tube cuff pressure (CP) are at risk of developing tracheal or subglottic stenosis. Recently an increasing number of patients have presented to our hospital with these complications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the frequency of tracheal tube CP measurements and the range of CP and to explore nursing knowledge regarding CP monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Frequency of CP measurement was assessed using a prospective chart review, followed by an interventional component. In the final stage nurses completed a self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 304 charts from 61 patients were reviewed. Patients' ages ranged from 1 to 71 years, with a male preponderance (1.5:1). The majority of charts (87%) did not reflect a documented CP measurement and only 12 charts showed at least one measurement per shift. Only 17% of recorded CPs were within the recommended range; 59% were too low. The questionnaire was completed by only 51% of the 75 respondents. Nursing experience ranged from 3 to 35 years and 92% of respondents were trained in critical care. Knowledge of current critical care CP monitoring guidelines was reported by 62% of the respondents (n=23/37). Only 53% (20/38) reported routinely measuring CP. Almost all respondents (94%) knew of at least one complication of abnormal CP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Having a basic knowledge of CP measurement, having awareness of the complications of abnormal CP and the availability of national best practice guidelines did not translate into appropriate ICU practice. Research into effective implementation strategies to achieve best practice is needed.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>Basic knowledge of cuff pressure measurement may not always result in best practice.Improvement in current practice requires research into effective implementation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/5c/SAJCC-35-1-373.PMC10041395.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1.373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intubated patients with a high tracheal tube cuff pressure (CP) are at risk of developing tracheal or subglottic stenosis. Recently an increasing number of patients have presented to our hospital with these complications.

Objectives: To determine the frequency of tracheal tube CP measurements and the range of CP and to explore nursing knowledge regarding CP monitoring.

Methods: Frequency of CP measurement was assessed using a prospective chart review, followed by an interventional component. In the final stage nurses completed a self-administered questionnaire.

Results: A total of 304 charts from 61 patients were reviewed. Patients' ages ranged from 1 to 71 years, with a male preponderance (1.5:1). The majority of charts (87%) did not reflect a documented CP measurement and only 12 charts showed at least one measurement per shift. Only 17% of recorded CPs were within the recommended range; 59% were too low. The questionnaire was completed by only 51% of the 75 respondents. Nursing experience ranged from 3 to 35 years and 92% of respondents were trained in critical care. Knowledge of current critical care CP monitoring guidelines was reported by 62% of the respondents (n=23/37). Only 53% (20/38) reported routinely measuring CP. Almost all respondents (94%) knew of at least one complication of abnormal CP.

Conclusion: Having a basic knowledge of CP measurement, having awareness of the complications of abnormal CP and the availability of national best practice guidelines did not translate into appropriate ICU practice. Research into effective implementation strategies to achieve best practice is needed.

Contributions of the study: Basic knowledge of cuff pressure measurement may not always result in best practice.Improvement in current practice requires research into effective implementation strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

气管导管袖带压力监测:评估克里斯哈尼-巴拉夸那思学术医院危重病人的现行做法。
背景:气管导管袖带压力(CP)过高的插管患者有可能发生气管或声门下狭窄。最近,越来越多的患者到我院就诊时出现了这些并发症:确定气管导管袖带压力(CP)的测量频率和范围,并探讨有关 CP 监测的护理知识:方法:采用前瞻性病历审查评估CP测量频率,然后进行干预。最后,护士填写了一份自填问卷:结果:共审查了 61 名患者的 304 份病历。患者年龄从 1 岁到 71 岁不等,男性居多(1.5:1)。大多数病历(87%)没有记录 CP 测量,只有 12 份病历显示每班至少有一次测量。只有 17% 记录的 CP 值在建议范围内;59% 的 CP 值过低。在 75 名受访者中,只有 51% 完成了问卷调查。护理经验从 3 年到 35 年不等,92% 的受访者接受过危重症护理培训。62%的受访者(n=23/37)表示了解当前重症监护 CP 监测指南。只有 53% 的受访者(20/38)表示会对 CP 进行常规测量。几乎所有受访者(94%)都知道至少一种 CP 异常的并发症:结论:对 CP 测量的基本了解、对 CP 异常并发症的认识以及国家最佳实践指南的可用性并不能转化为适当的 ICU 实践。需要对实现最佳实践的有效实施策略进行研究:关于袖带压力测量的基础知识不一定总能带来最佳实践,要改善目前的实践,需要研究有效的实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信