Effectiveness of Brachial Plexus Blocks in Obesity: Secondary Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-23 DOI:10.1177/15589447231161039
Barkat Ali, Michelle D Palazzo, Huey Tien
{"title":"Effectiveness of Brachial Plexus Blocks in Obesity: Secondary Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Barkat Ali, Michelle D Palazzo, Huey Tien","doi":"10.1177/15589447231161039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brachial plexus block for hand and upper extremity procedures in the obese presents a unique set of technical challenges. The authors examined how obesity affects procedural success, quality of anesthesia, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of a randomized control trial comparing the retroclavicular versus supraclavicular brachial plexus block for distal upper extremity surgery was conducted. Patients were randomized to supraclavicular or retroclavicular brachial plexus block groups in the original trial. In this study, the authors dichotomized patients by obesity to compare differences in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen of 117 patients (13.7%) were obese. The groups were statistically well balanced in terms of baseline and operative variables. Obese patients had increased imaging time 2.7 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-3.92) versus 1.9 minutes (95% CI, 1.64-2.16), <i>P</i> value = .05; needling time 6.6 minutes (95% CI, 5.17-7.95) versus 5.8 minutes (95% CI, 5.04-5.74), <i>P</i> = .02; and procedure time 9.3 minutes (95% CI, 7.04-11.46) versus 7.3 minutes (95% CI, 6.79-7.79), <i>P</i> = .01. Block success and complications were not statistically significant. The visual analog scores during the block, at 2 hours, and 24 hours after were not statistically different. Patient satisfaction score among obese patients was 9.1 (95% CI, 8.6-9.6) versus 9.2 (95% CI, 9.1-9.4), <i>P</i> = .63.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this trial suggest that despite an increased procedural difficulty, the use of both supraclavicular and retroclavicular brachial plexus blocks is associated with comparable quality of anesthesia, similar complication profile, equal opioid requirements, and similar patient satisfaction in the obese.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231161039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brachial plexus block for hand and upper extremity procedures in the obese presents a unique set of technical challenges. The authors examined how obesity affects procedural success, quality of anesthesia, and patient satisfaction.

Methods: Secondary analysis of a randomized control trial comparing the retroclavicular versus supraclavicular brachial plexus block for distal upper extremity surgery was conducted. Patients were randomized to supraclavicular or retroclavicular brachial plexus block groups in the original trial. In this study, the authors dichotomized patients by obesity to compare differences in outcomes.

Results: Sixteen of 117 patients (13.7%) were obese. The groups were statistically well balanced in terms of baseline and operative variables. Obese patients had increased imaging time 2.7 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-3.92) versus 1.9 minutes (95% CI, 1.64-2.16), P value = .05; needling time 6.6 minutes (95% CI, 5.17-7.95) versus 5.8 minutes (95% CI, 5.04-5.74), P = .02; and procedure time 9.3 minutes (95% CI, 7.04-11.46) versus 7.3 minutes (95% CI, 6.79-7.79), P = .01. Block success and complications were not statistically significant. The visual analog scores during the block, at 2 hours, and 24 hours after were not statistically different. Patient satisfaction score among obese patients was 9.1 (95% CI, 8.6-9.6) versus 9.2 (95% CI, 9.1-9.4), P = .63.

Conclusion: Findings from this trial suggest that despite an increased procedural difficulty, the use of both supraclavicular and retroclavicular brachial plexus blocks is associated with comparable quality of anesthesia, similar complication profile, equal opioid requirements, and similar patient satisfaction in the obese.

臂丛神经阻滞对肥胖症的疗效:随机对照试验的二次分析。
背景:肥胖者在手部和上肢手术中进行臂丛神经阻滞会面临一系列独特的技术挑战。作者研究了肥胖如何影响手术成功率、麻醉质量和患者满意度:对一项随机对照试验进行了二次分析,该试验比较了上肢远端手术的锁骨后与锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞。在最初的试验中,患者被随机分配到锁骨上或锁骨后臂丛神经阻滞组。在本研究中,作者按肥胖程度对患者进行了二分法,以比较结果的差异:结果:117 位患者中有 16 位(13.7%)肥胖。两组患者的基线和手术变量在统计学上非常平衡。肥胖患者的成像时间增加了 2.7 分钟(95% 置信区间 [CI],1.44-3.92)对 1.9 分钟(95% CI,1.64-2.16),P 值 = .05;针刺时间增加了 6.6 分钟(95% CI,5.17-7.95)对 5.8 分钟(95% CI,5.04-5.74),P = .02;手术时间增加了 9.3 分钟(95% CI,7.04-11.46)对 7.3 分钟(95% CI,6.79-7.79),P = .01。阻滞成功率和并发症无统计学意义。阻滞期间、2 小时后和 24 小时后的视觉模拟评分没有统计学差异。肥胖患者的患者满意度评分为 9.1(95% CI,8.6-9.6)对 9.2(95% CI,9.1-9.4),P = .63:该试验结果表明,尽管手术难度增加,但在肥胖患者中同时使用锁骨上和锁骨后臂丛阻滞可获得相似的麻醉质量、相似的并发症情况、相同的阿片类药物需求量和相似的患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信