Retrospective cohort study of the impact of faecoliths on the natural history of acute appendicitis.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Mei Sze Lee, Rachel Purcell, Andrew McCombie, Frank Frizelle, Timothy Eglinton
{"title":"Retrospective cohort study of the impact of faecoliths on the natural history of acute appendicitis.","authors":"Mei Sze Lee,&nbsp;Rachel Purcell,&nbsp;Andrew McCombie,&nbsp;Frank Frizelle,&nbsp;Timothy Eglinton","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00486-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies, its aetiology remains incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the rate at which faecoliths were present in acute appendicitis treated with appendicectomy and whether their presence was associated with complicated appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult patients who underwent appendicectomy for acute appendicitis in a 2 years period (January 2018 and December 2019) at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of a faecolith was identified by at least one of three methods: pre-operative CT scan, intraoperative identification, or histopathology report. Patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of a faecolith and demographics, type of appendicitis and surgical outcomes analysed. Complicated appendicitis was defined as appendicitis with perforation, gangrene and/or periappendicular abscess formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1035 appendicectomies were performed with acute appendicitis confirmed in 860 (83%), of which 314 (37%) were classified as complicated appendicitis. Three hundred thirty-nine (35%) of the appendicitis cases had faecoliths (complicated 165/314 cases; 53%; uncomplicated 128/546; 23%, p < 0.001). The presence of a faecolith was associated with higher complications and a subsequent longer post-operative stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rigorous methodology of this study has demonstrated a higher rate of faecolith presence in acute appendicitis than previously documented. It reinforces the association of faecoliths with a complicated disease course and the importance in prioritising emergency surgery and postoperative monitoring for complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012716/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00486-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Despite acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies, its aetiology remains incompletely understood.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the rate at which faecoliths were present in acute appendicitis treated with appendicectomy and whether their presence was associated with complicated appendicitis.

Methods: All adult patients who underwent appendicectomy for acute appendicitis in a 2 years period (January 2018 and December 2019) at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of a faecolith was identified by at least one of three methods: pre-operative CT scan, intraoperative identification, or histopathology report. Patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of a faecolith and demographics, type of appendicitis and surgical outcomes analysed. Complicated appendicitis was defined as appendicitis with perforation, gangrene and/or periappendicular abscess formation.

Results: A total of 1035 appendicectomies were performed with acute appendicitis confirmed in 860 (83%), of which 314 (37%) were classified as complicated appendicitis. Three hundred thirty-nine (35%) of the appendicitis cases had faecoliths (complicated 165/314 cases; 53%; uncomplicated 128/546; 23%, p < 0.001). The presence of a faecolith was associated with higher complications and a subsequent longer post-operative stay.

Conclusion: The rigorous methodology of this study has demonstrated a higher rate of faecolith presence in acute appendicitis than previously documented. It reinforces the association of faecoliths with a complicated disease course and the importance in prioritising emergency surgery and postoperative monitoring for complications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

粪石对急性阑尾炎自然史影响的回顾性队列研究。
背景:尽管急性阑尾炎是最常见的外科急症之一,但其病因仍不完全清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估阑尾切除术后急性阑尾炎患者粪便结石的发生率,以及它们的存在是否与复杂性阑尾炎有关。方法:回顾性分析两年内(2018年1月至2019年12月)在同一家机构接受急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术的所有成年患者。粪石的存在通过以下三种方法中的至少一种来确定:术前CT扫描,术中鉴定或组织病理学报告。根据粪石的存在与否、人口统计学、阑尾炎的类型和手术结果进行分组分析。复杂性阑尾炎定义为阑尾炎伴穿孔、坏疽和/或阑尾周围脓肿形成。结果:共行阑尾切除术1035例,确诊急性阑尾炎860例(83%),其中合并阑尾炎314例(37%)。339例(35%)阑尾炎患者出现粪石(并发症165例/314例;53%;简单的128/546;结论:严谨的研究方法表明,急性阑尾炎中粪石的存在率高于先前的文献。它强调了粪石与复杂病程的关联,以及优先进行紧急手术和术后并发症监测的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信