An inclusive typology of values for navigating transformations towards a just and sustainable future

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Christopher M. Raymond , Christopher B. Anderson , Simone Athayde , Arild Vatn , Ariane M. Amin , Paola Arias-Arévalo , Michael Christie , Mariana Cantú-Fernández , Rachelle K. Gould , Austin Himes , Jasper O. Kenter , Dominic Lenzi , Barbara Muraca , Ranjini Murali , Sebastian O’Connor , Unai Pascual , Sonya Sachdeva , Aibek Samakov , Eglee Zent
{"title":"An inclusive typology of values for navigating transformations towards a just and sustainable future","authors":"Christopher M. Raymond ,&nbsp;Christopher B. Anderson ,&nbsp;Simone Athayde ,&nbsp;Arild Vatn ,&nbsp;Ariane M. Amin ,&nbsp;Paola Arias-Arévalo ,&nbsp;Michael Christie ,&nbsp;Mariana Cantú-Fernández ,&nbsp;Rachelle K. Gould ,&nbsp;Austin Himes ,&nbsp;Jasper O. Kenter ,&nbsp;Dominic Lenzi ,&nbsp;Barbara Muraca ,&nbsp;Ranjini Murali ,&nbsp;Sebastian O’Connor ,&nbsp;Unai Pascual ,&nbsp;Sonya Sachdeva ,&nbsp;Aibek Samakov ,&nbsp;Eglee Zent","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Achieving the intertwined goals of justice and sustainability requires transformative changes to meaningfully engage diverse perspectives. Therefore, scholars and policymakers need new ways of recognising and addressing nature’s multiple values across cultures, disciplines and other knowledge traditions. By reviewing academic publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local community sources, we developed an inclusive typology of nature’s values to clarify value concepts and guide their consideration in decisions. Through case studies, we illustrate how navigating ‘horizontal’ and ‘vertical’ interactions within and across this typology can help confront plural-value challenges, such as enhancing inclusive participation in environmental research and practice, and effective management of socio-environmental conflicts. We conclude by exploring how this typology of values can further leverage transformative change in other decision-making contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101301"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000489/pdfft?md5=01a92374cde2577c74e1b5dcd917b53f&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523000489-main.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Achieving the intertwined goals of justice and sustainability requires transformative changes to meaningfully engage diverse perspectives. Therefore, scholars and policymakers need new ways of recognising and addressing nature’s multiple values across cultures, disciplines and other knowledge traditions. By reviewing academic publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local community sources, we developed an inclusive typology of nature’s values to clarify value concepts and guide their consideration in decisions. Through case studies, we illustrate how navigating ‘horizontal’ and ‘vertical’ interactions within and across this typology can help confront plural-value challenges, such as enhancing inclusive participation in environmental research and practice, and effective management of socio-environmental conflicts. We conclude by exploring how this typology of values can further leverage transformative change in other decision-making contexts.

一种包容性的价值观类型,用于引导转型走向公正和可持续的未来
要实现正义和可持续性这两个相互交织的目标,就需要进行变革性变革,有意义地吸纳不同观点。因此,学者和政策制定者需要新的方法来认识和处理跨文化、学科和其他知识传统的自然的多重价值。通过回顾学术出版物、政策文件以及土著和当地社区资源,我们开发了一种包容性的自然价值类型学,以澄清价值概念并指导决策中的考虑。通过案例研究,我们说明了如何在这种类型内部和之间进行“水平”和“垂直”互动,以帮助应对多元价值挑战,例如加强对环境研究和实践的包容性参与,以及对社会环境冲突的有效管理。最后,我们将探讨这种价值类型如何在其他决策环境中进一步利用变革性变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信