Mortality association factors in hematologic cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than one day in a developing country. A prospective cohort study

IF 0.3 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Enas Abd El motlb, Alaa El-Deeb
{"title":"Mortality association factors in hematologic cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than one day in a developing country. A prospective cohort study","authors":"Enas Abd El motlb,&nbsp;Alaa El-Deeb","doi":"10.1016/j.ejccm.2017.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The potential benefit of intensive care unit (ICU) admission of hematologic cancer patient requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) still controversial especially with increased cost of needed life support measures.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To seek clinical predictors of ICU mortality in hematologic cancer patients requiring (MV) during the first day of admission to the ICU.</p><p>Design, Setting, Participants: 448 patients were included in this prospective observational cohort study, between May 2014 and May 2016 at the oncology center of Mansoura university hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><p>ICU mortality was (350 out of 448 patients). Indications of (MV) were sepsis (42%), airway/ pulmonary invasion by tumor (33%), cardiopulmonary arrest (3%), coma (16%) and pulmonary embolism (5%). The independent risk factors for mortality were performance status 3–4(odds ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval [1.35:4.60]); cancer recurrence/ progression (odds ratio, 9.31;95% confidence interval, [4.18:21.24]); pao2/ fio2 ratio &lt; 150 (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, [1.344:4.68]); airway/ pulmonary involvement by tumor as a cause of M.V. (odds ratio, 6.73; 95% confidence interval, [2.2:10.05]); sequential organ failure assessment score(excluding respiratory points, each 4 points; odds ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval, [1.16:3.133]); use of vasopressors (odds ratio, 3.39; confidence interval, [1.73:6.44]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Poor performance status, cancer status, severity of acute organ failure, use of vasopressors and airway/pulmonary involvement by tumor were the main predictors of mortality. Making use of such clinical data may help to provide intensive care for patients with a potential chance of survival.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31233,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 77-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejccm.2017.11.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730317300373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

The potential benefit of intensive care unit (ICU) admission of hematologic cancer patient requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) still controversial especially with increased cost of needed life support measures.

Objective

To seek clinical predictors of ICU mortality in hematologic cancer patients requiring (MV) during the first day of admission to the ICU.

Design, Setting, Participants: 448 patients were included in this prospective observational cohort study, between May 2014 and May 2016 at the oncology center of Mansoura university hospital.

Measurements and Main Results

ICU mortality was (350 out of 448 patients). Indications of (MV) were sepsis (42%), airway/ pulmonary invasion by tumor (33%), cardiopulmonary arrest (3%), coma (16%) and pulmonary embolism (5%). The independent risk factors for mortality were performance status 3–4(odds ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval [1.35:4.60]); cancer recurrence/ progression (odds ratio, 9.31;95% confidence interval, [4.18:21.24]); pao2/ fio2 ratio < 150 (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, [1.344:4.68]); airway/ pulmonary involvement by tumor as a cause of M.V. (odds ratio, 6.73; 95% confidence interval, [2.2:10.05]); sequential organ failure assessment score(excluding respiratory points, each 4 points; odds ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval, [1.16:3.133]); use of vasopressors (odds ratio, 3.39; confidence interval, [1.73:6.44]).

Conclusion

Poor performance status, cancer status, severity of acute organ failure, use of vasopressors and airway/pulmonary involvement by tumor were the main predictors of mortality. Making use of such clinical data may help to provide intensive care for patients with a potential chance of survival.

发展中国家需要机械通气超过一天的血液病患者死亡率相关因素一项前瞻性队列研究
背景:对于需要机械通气(MV)的血液学癌症患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)的潜在益处仍然存在争议,特别是随着所需生命支持措施成本的增加。目的探讨血液学肿瘤患者入ICU第一天住院死亡率的临床预测因素。设计、环境、参与者:2014年5月至2016年5月,曼苏拉大学医院肿瘤中心的448名患者被纳入这项前瞻性观察队列研究。448例患者中icu死亡率为350例。(MV)的适应症为败血症(42%)、肿瘤侵犯气道/肺部(33%)、心肺骤停(3%)、昏迷(16%)和肺栓塞(5%)。死亡的独立危险因素为:表现状态3-4(优势比2.49;95%置信区间[1.35:4.60]);癌症复发/进展(优势比,9.31;95%可信区间,[4.18:21.24]);Pao2 / fio2比值 < 150(优势比2.47;95%置信区间,[1.344:4.68]);肿瘤累及气道/肺部作为M.V.的病因(优势比,6.73;95%置信区间,[2.2:10.05]);序贯器官衰竭评估评分(不含呼吸分,各4分;优势比2.14;95%置信区间,[1.16:3.133]);血管加压药物的使用(优势比,3.39;置信区间,[1.73:6.44])。结论运动能力差、肿瘤状态、急性脏器功能衰竭严重程度、血管加压药物使用情况和肿瘤累及气道/肺是影响死亡的主要因素。利用这些临床数据可能有助于为有潜在生存机会的患者提供重症监护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine is the official Journal of the Egyptian College of Critical Care Physicians, the most authoritative organization of Egyptian physicians involved in the multi-professional field of critical care medicine. The journal is intended to provide a peer-reviewed source for multidisciplinary coverage of general acute and intensive care medicine and its various subcategories including cardiac, pulmonary, neuro, renal as well as post-operative care. The journal is proud to have an international multi-professional editorial board in the broad field of critical care that will assist in publishing promising research and breakthrough reports that lead to better patients care in life threatening conditions, and bring the reader a quick access to the latest diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in monitoring and management of critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信