{"title":"Avaliação de testes à beira leito e proposta de modelo para prever laringoscopia difícil: estudo prospectivo observacional","authors":"Chara Liaskou , Eleftherios Vouzounerakis , Anastasia Trikoupi , Chryssoula Staikou","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>The prediction of difficult laryngoscopy is based on tests that assess anatomic characteristics of face and neck. We aimed to identify the most accurate tests and propose a multivariate predictive model<strong>.</strong></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective observational study included 1134 patients. Thyromental Distance (TMD), Sternomental Distance (STMD), Ratio of Height‐to‐Thyromental Distance (R‐H/TMD), Neck Circumference (NC), Ratio of Neck Circumference‐to‐Thyromental Distance (R‐NC/TMD), Hyomental Distance with head in Neutral Position (HMD‐NP) and at Maximal Extension (HMD‐HE), Ratio of Hyomental Distance at Maximal head extension‐to‐hyomental distance in neutral position (R‐HMD), Mallampati Class (MLC), Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Mouth Opening (MO) and Head Extension (HE) were assessed preoperatively<strong>.</strong> A Cormack‐Lehane Grade ≥ 3 was defined as Difficult Laryngoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were assessed for all tests. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was used to create the predictive models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A model incorporating MLC, ULBT, HE, HMD‐HE and R‐NC/TMD showed high prognostic accuracy; x<sup>2</sup>(5)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->109.12, <em>p</em> <<!--> <!-->0.001, AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.86, <em>p</em> <<!--> <!-->0.001). Its sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value were 82.3%, 74.8% and 97.4%, respectively. A second model including two measurements not requiring patient's cooperation (R‐NC/TMD and HMD‐HE) exhibited good prognostic performance; x<sup>2</sup>(2)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->63.5, <em>p</em> <<!--> <!-->0.001, AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.77, <em>p</em> <<!--> <!-->0.001. Among single tests, HE had the highest sensitivity (78.5%) and negative predictive value (96%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A five‐variable model incorporating MLC, ULBT, HE, HMD‐HE and R‐NC/TMD showed satisfyingly high predictive value for difficult laryngoscopy. A model including R‐NC/TMD and HMD‐HE could be useful in incapable patients. The most accurate single predictor was HE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":"70 2","pages":"Pages 125-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.02.007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003470941930443X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives
The prediction of difficult laryngoscopy is based on tests that assess anatomic characteristics of face and neck. We aimed to identify the most accurate tests and propose a multivariate predictive model.
Methods
This prospective observational study included 1134 patients. Thyromental Distance (TMD), Sternomental Distance (STMD), Ratio of Height‐to‐Thyromental Distance (R‐H/TMD), Neck Circumference (NC), Ratio of Neck Circumference‐to‐Thyromental Distance (R‐NC/TMD), Hyomental Distance with head in Neutral Position (HMD‐NP) and at Maximal Extension (HMD‐HE), Ratio of Hyomental Distance at Maximal head extension‐to‐hyomental distance in neutral position (R‐HMD), Mallampati Class (MLC), Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Mouth Opening (MO) and Head Extension (HE) were assessed preoperatively. A Cormack‐Lehane Grade ≥ 3 was defined as Difficult Laryngoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were assessed for all tests. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was used to create the predictive models.
Results
A model incorporating MLC, ULBT, HE, HMD‐HE and R‐NC/TMD showed high prognostic accuracy; x2(5) = 109.12, p < 0.001, AUC = 0.86, p < 0.001). Its sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value were 82.3%, 74.8% and 97.4%, respectively. A second model including two measurements not requiring patient's cooperation (R‐NC/TMD and HMD‐HE) exhibited good prognostic performance; x2(2) = 63.5, p < 0.001, AUC = 0.77, p < 0.001. Among single tests, HE had the highest sensitivity (78.5%) and negative predictive value (96%).
Conclusions
A five‐variable model incorporating MLC, ULBT, HE, HMD‐HE and R‐NC/TMD showed satisfyingly high predictive value for difficult laryngoscopy. A model including R‐NC/TMD and HMD‐HE could be useful in incapable patients. The most accurate single predictor was HE.
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories:
-Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)-
Clinical information (case reports)-
Reviews-
Letters to the Editor-
Editorials.
The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician.
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.