Impact of Abortion on Subsequent Fecundity

CAROL J. ROWLAND HOGUE
{"title":"Impact of Abortion on Subsequent Fecundity","authors":"CAROL J. ROWLAND HOGUE","doi":"10.1016/S0306-3356(21)00156-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The impact of abortion on subsequent fecundity has been extensively studied, especially since abortion was legalized in Eastern Europe during the 1950s and 1960s and in Western Europe and the USA during the 1960s and 1970s. A review of this literature reveals a number of consistent findings. First, women who choose to have their first pregnancy terminated are at no increased risk of failing to conceive at a later date. Exceptions include abortions complicated by infection leading to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). However, this combination of factors occurs very infrequently. Second, women whose first pregnancy is terminated by vacuum aspiration are at no increased risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy. Exceptions may be women whose abortion is complicated by pre-existing <em>C. trachomatis</em> and others who experience post-abortion infection leading to PID. Third, women whose first pregnancy is terminated by vacuum aspiration are at no increased risk of subsequent mid-trimester spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery or low birthweight, when compared with women who are pregnant for the first time. Fourth, women whose first pregnancy is terminated by D &amp; C may have an increased risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy, mid-trimester spontaneous abortion and low birthweight. Fifth, more research is needed before it is clear whether multiple induced abortions carry an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Finally, too little is known about fecundity following mid-trimester abortion procedures to state definitively that they carry no increased risk of adverse outcomes. However, studies to date suggest that instillation procedures carry little, if any, excess risk. Risks related to dilation and evacuation, if any, may be related to the method and extent of cervical dilation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75719,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306335621001564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of abortion on subsequent fecundity has been extensively studied, especially since abortion was legalized in Eastern Europe during the 1950s and 1960s and in Western Europe and the USA during the 1960s and 1970s. A review of this literature reveals a number of consistent findings. First, women who choose to have their first pregnancy terminated are at no increased risk of failing to conceive at a later date. Exceptions include abortions complicated by infection leading to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). However, this combination of factors occurs very infrequently. Second, women whose first pregnancy is terminated by vacuum aspiration are at no increased risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy. Exceptions may be women whose abortion is complicated by pre-existing C. trachomatis and others who experience post-abortion infection leading to PID. Third, women whose first pregnancy is terminated by vacuum aspiration are at no increased risk of subsequent mid-trimester spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery or low birthweight, when compared with women who are pregnant for the first time. Fourth, women whose first pregnancy is terminated by D & C may have an increased risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy, mid-trimester spontaneous abortion and low birthweight. Fifth, more research is needed before it is clear whether multiple induced abortions carry an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Finally, too little is known about fecundity following mid-trimester abortion procedures to state definitively that they carry no increased risk of adverse outcomes. However, studies to date suggest that instillation procedures carry little, if any, excess risk. Risks related to dilation and evacuation, if any, may be related to the method and extent of cervical dilation.

流产对后续生育能力的影响
堕胎对随后生育能力的影响已被广泛研究,特别是自从堕胎在20世纪50年代和60年代在东欧合法化以及在20世纪60年代和70年代在西欧和美国合法化以来。对这些文献的回顾揭示了一些一致的发现。首先,选择终止第一次妊娠的妇女在以后的日子里不会增加怀孕失败的风险。例外情况包括流产合并感染导致盆腔炎(PID)。然而,这种因素的组合很少发生。其次,第一次妊娠通过真空抽吸终止的妇女随后发生异位妊娠的风险没有增加。例外情况可能是流产后合并已有沙眼衣原体的妇女和流产后感染导致盆腔炎的妇女。第三,与首次怀孕的妇女相比,首次妊娠通过真空抽吸终止的妇女在随后的中期自然流产、早产或低出生体重的风险没有增加。第四,第一次怀孕被D &C可能会增加随后异位妊娠、中期自然流产和低出生体重的风险。第五,在明确多次人工流产是否会增加不良妊娠结局的风险之前,还需要进行更多的研究。最后,由于对中期流产手术后生育能力的了解太少,无法明确地说明它们不会增加不良后果的风险。然而,迄今为止的研究表明,注射过程几乎没有额外的风险。与宫颈扩张和引流相关的风险,如果有的话,可能与宫颈扩张的方法和程度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信