Suboptimal control of cardiovascular risk factors in myocardial infarction survivors in a cardiac rehabilitation program

Vasco Silva , Eduardo Matos Vilela , Lilibeth Campos , Fátima Miranda , Susana Torres , Ana João , Madalena Teixeira , Pedro Braga , Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho
{"title":"Suboptimal control of cardiovascular risk factors in myocardial infarction survivors in a cardiac rehabilitation program","authors":"Vasco Silva ,&nbsp;Eduardo Matos Vilela ,&nbsp;Lilibeth Campos ,&nbsp;Fátima Miranda ,&nbsp;Susana Torres ,&nbsp;Ana João ,&nbsp;Madalena Teixeira ,&nbsp;Pedro Braga ,&nbsp;Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho","doi":"10.1016/j.repce.2021.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>As short-term mortality continues to decrease after myocardial infarction (MI), secondary prevention strategies attain increasing relevance. This study aimed at assessing the control of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, including dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes, in a contemporary cohort of MI survivors who completed an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) program.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational, retrospective cohort study including patients admitted to a tertiary center with acute MI between November 2012 and April 2017, who completed a phase II EBCR program after discharge. Achievement of low-density lipoprotein (LD) cholesterol, blood pressure and HbA1c guideline recommended targets was assessed. Lipid profile parameters were assessed and compared at three time points (hospitalization, beginning and end of the program).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 379 patients were included. Mean age was 58.8±10.6 years; 81% were male. Considering the European Society of Cardiology's guidelines on contemporary data collection, 61%, 87% and 71% achieved the recommended LDL cholesterol, blood pressure and HbA1c targets, respectively, at the end of the program. Combining all three risk factors, 42% achieved the recommended targets. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein decreased between the beginning and the end of the program [0.14 (0.08-0.29) mg/L to 0.12 (0.06-0.26) mg/L; p&lt;0.001].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite contemporary management strategies, including enrollment in a structured EBCR program, a substantial number of patients presented suboptimal control of CV risk factors. Considering the dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes results, less than half of the enrolled individuals achieved the recommended targets. These findings highlight a pivotal unmet need which could be particularly relevant in improving CV outcomes by enhancing secondary prevention profiles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101121,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)","volume":"40 12","pages":"Pages 911-920"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2174204921003603/pdfft?md5=9427f8be40386099aa6d3f5f386a4b00&pid=1-s2.0-S2174204921003603-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2174204921003603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

As short-term mortality continues to decrease after myocardial infarction (MI), secondary prevention strategies attain increasing relevance. This study aimed at assessing the control of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, including dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes, in a contemporary cohort of MI survivors who completed an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) program.

Methods

Observational, retrospective cohort study including patients admitted to a tertiary center with acute MI between November 2012 and April 2017, who completed a phase II EBCR program after discharge. Achievement of low-density lipoprotein (LD) cholesterol, blood pressure and HbA1c guideline recommended targets was assessed. Lipid profile parameters were assessed and compared at three time points (hospitalization, beginning and end of the program).

Results

A total of 379 patients were included. Mean age was 58.8±10.6 years; 81% were male. Considering the European Society of Cardiology's guidelines on contemporary data collection, 61%, 87% and 71% achieved the recommended LDL cholesterol, blood pressure and HbA1c targets, respectively, at the end of the program. Combining all three risk factors, 42% achieved the recommended targets. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein decreased between the beginning and the end of the program [0.14 (0.08-0.29) mg/L to 0.12 (0.06-0.26) mg/L; p<0.001].

Conclusion

Despite contemporary management strategies, including enrollment in a structured EBCR program, a substantial number of patients presented suboptimal control of CV risk factors. Considering the dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes results, less than half of the enrolled individuals achieved the recommended targets. These findings highlight a pivotal unmet need which could be particularly relevant in improving CV outcomes by enhancing secondary prevention profiles.

心脏康复计划中心肌梗死幸存者心血管危险因素的次优控制
简介和目的随着心肌梗死(MI)后短期死亡率的持续下降,二级预防策略变得越来越重要。本研究旨在评估心血管(CV)危险因素的控制,包括血脂异常、高血压和糖尿病,研究对象为完成运动心脏康复(EBCR)项目的当代心肌梗死幸存者。方法采用观察性、回顾性队列研究,纳入2012年11月至2017年4月在三级中心收治的急性心肌梗死患者,出院后完成II期EBCR项目。评估低密度脂蛋白(LD)胆固醇、血压和HbA1c指南推荐目标的实现情况。在三个时间点(住院、计划开始和结束)评估和比较血脂参数。结果共纳入379例患者。平均年龄58.8±10.6岁;81%为男性。考虑到欧洲心脏病学会关于当代数据收集的指南,61%、87%和71%的患者在项目结束时分别达到了推荐的LDL胆固醇、血压和HbA1c目标。综合所有三个风险因素,42%的人达到了建议的目标。高灵敏度c反应蛋白在项目开始和结束时下降[0.14 (0.08-0.29)mg/L至0.12 (0.06-0.26)mg/L;术中,0.001]。结论:尽管采用了现代的管理策略,包括纳入结构化的EBCR项目,但仍有相当数量的患者对心血管危险因素的控制不理想。考虑到血脂异常、高血压和糖尿病的结果,不到一半的入组个体达到了推荐的目标。这些发现强调了一个关键的未满足的需求,这可能与通过加强二级预防来改善CV结果特别相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信