Comparing the accuracy of master models based on digital intra-oral scanners with conventional plaster casts

Q3 Medicine
Christoph Vögtlin, Georg Schulz, Kurt Jäger, Bert Müller
{"title":"Comparing the accuracy of master models based on digital intra-oral scanners with conventional plaster casts","authors":"Christoph Vögtlin,&nbsp;Georg Schulz,&nbsp;Kurt Jäger,&nbsp;Bert Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.phmed.2016.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For the fabrication of dental inlays and crowns precise information on patients' teeth morphology is required. Besides the conventional method, where mold materials impressions are prepared, the use of digital scanners is more and more becoming a central part in the nowadays dentistry. The aim of the manuscript is to compare the accuracy of master models based on two intra-oral digital scanners and silicone impressions. A metal cast reference arch model with predefined measurement points was scanned using the Lava™ Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. and the iTero™ Intraoral Scanner respectively. These scans were applied for the fabrication of models using rapid prototyping and milling from a proprietary resin. In addition, plaster models were produced using conventional A-silicone impressions. Using a coordinate measuring machine and a micro computed tomography scanner the models were evaluated with micrometer precision. The mean distance deviations from model to model correspond to 112 μm (C.O.S.), 50 μm (iTero™) and 16 μm (gypsum). The results verified the high precision of the conventional technique based on A-silicone impressions and plaster models. The accuracy of the master models obtained on the basis of the digital scans is clinically sufficient to fabricate bridges with up to four units.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37787,"journal":{"name":"Physics in Medicine","volume":"1 ","pages":"Pages 20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.phmed.2016.04.002","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352451016300038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

For the fabrication of dental inlays and crowns precise information on patients' teeth morphology is required. Besides the conventional method, where mold materials impressions are prepared, the use of digital scanners is more and more becoming a central part in the nowadays dentistry. The aim of the manuscript is to compare the accuracy of master models based on two intra-oral digital scanners and silicone impressions. A metal cast reference arch model with predefined measurement points was scanned using the Lava™ Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. and the iTero™ Intraoral Scanner respectively. These scans were applied for the fabrication of models using rapid prototyping and milling from a proprietary resin. In addition, plaster models were produced using conventional A-silicone impressions. Using a coordinate measuring machine and a micro computed tomography scanner the models were evaluated with micrometer precision. The mean distance deviations from model to model correspond to 112 μm (C.O.S.), 50 μm (iTero™) and 16 μm (gypsum). The results verified the high precision of the conventional technique based on A-silicone impressions and plaster models. The accuracy of the master models obtained on the basis of the digital scans is clinically sufficient to fabricate bridges with up to four units.

基于数字口腔内扫描仪的主模型与传统石膏模型的准确性比较
为了制作牙嵌体和牙冠,需要患者牙齿形态的精确信息。除了传统的方法,其中模具材料的印痕准备,数字扫描仪的使用越来越成为当今牙科的核心部分。该手稿的目的是比较基于两个口腔内数字扫描仪和硅胶印痕的主模型的准确性。使用Lava™Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S.和iTero™Intraoral Scanner分别扫描具有预定义测点的金属铸造参考弓模型。这些扫描应用于模型的制造使用快速原型和铣削专有树脂。此外,石膏模型是使用传统的a -硅胶压模制作的。利用坐标测量机和微型计算机断层扫描仪对模型进行了微米精度的评估。模型与模型之间的平均距离偏差分别为112 μm (C.O.S.)、50 μm (iTero™)和16 μm(石膏)。结果验证了基于a -硅胶模和石膏模型的传统技术的高精度。基于数字扫描获得的主模型的准确性在临床上足以制造多达四个单元的桥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in Medicine
Physics in Medicine Physics and Astronomy-Instrumentation
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Physics in Medicine consists of the application of theoretical and practical physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: Physics of Imaging Ultrasonic imaging, Optical imaging, X-ray imaging, Fluorescence Physics of Electromagnetics Neural Engineering, Signal analysis in Medicine, Electromagnetics and the nerve system, Quantum Electronics Physics of Therapy Ultrasonic therapy, Vibrational medicine, Laser Physics Physics of Materials and Mechanics Physics of impact and injuries, Physics of proteins, Metamaterials, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Biomedical Materials, Physics of vascular and cerebrovascular diseases, Micromechanics and Micro engineering, Microfluidics in medicine, Mechanics of the human body, Rotary molecular motors, Biological physics, Physics of bio fabrication and regenerative medicine Physics of Instrumentation Engineering of instruments, Physical effects of the application of instruments, Measurement Science and Technology, Physics of micro-labs and bioanalytical sensor devices, Optical instrumentation, Ultrasound instruments Physics of Hearing and Seeing Acoustics and hearing, Physics of hearing aids, Optics and vision, Physics of vision aids Physics of Space Medicine Space physiology, Space medicine related Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信