Machine learning-based prediction of low-value care for hospitalized patients

Andrew J. King , Lu Tang , Billie S. Davis , Sarah M. Preum , Leigh A. Bukowski , John Zimmerman , Jeremy M. Kahn
{"title":"Machine learning-based prediction of low-value care for hospitalized patients","authors":"Andrew J. King ,&nbsp;Lu Tang ,&nbsp;Billie S. Davis ,&nbsp;Sarah M. Preum ,&nbsp;Leigh A. Bukowski ,&nbsp;John Zimmerman ,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Kahn","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2023.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Low-value care (i.e., costly health care treatments that provide little or no benefit) is an ongoing problem in United States hospitals. Traditional strategies for reducing low-value care are only moderately successful. Informed by behavioral science principles, we sought to use machine learning to inform a targeted prompting system that suggests preferred alternative treatments at the point of care but before clinicians have made a decision.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used intravenous administration of albumin for fluid resuscitation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients as an exemplar of low-value care practice, identified using the electronic health record of a multi-hospital health system. We divided all ICU episodes into 4-h periods and defined a set of relevant clinical features at the period level. We then developed two machine learning models: a single-stage model that directly predicts if a patient will receive albumin in the next period; and a two-stage model that first predicts if any resuscitation fluid will be administered and then predicts albumin only among the patients with a high probability of fluid use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We examined 87,489 ICU episodes divided into approximately 1.5 million 4-h periods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 for both prediction models. The positive predictive value was 0.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.20, 0.23) for the single-stage model and 0.22 (0.20, 0.23) for the two-stage model. Applying either model in a targeted prompting system could prevent 10% of albumin administrations, with an attending physician receiving one prompt every 4.2 days of ICU service.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Prediction of low-value care is feasible and could enable a point-of-care, targeted prompting system that offers suggestions ahead of the moment of need before clinicians have already decided. A two-stage approach does not improve performance but does interject new levers for the calibration of such a system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521223000297/pdfft?md5=d988f6995039556797d42f805c1b7cfd&pid=1-s2.0-S2666521223000297-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521223000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Low-value care (i.e., costly health care treatments that provide little or no benefit) is an ongoing problem in United States hospitals. Traditional strategies for reducing low-value care are only moderately successful. Informed by behavioral science principles, we sought to use machine learning to inform a targeted prompting system that suggests preferred alternative treatments at the point of care but before clinicians have made a decision.

Methods

We used intravenous administration of albumin for fluid resuscitation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients as an exemplar of low-value care practice, identified using the electronic health record of a multi-hospital health system. We divided all ICU episodes into 4-h periods and defined a set of relevant clinical features at the period level. We then developed two machine learning models: a single-stage model that directly predicts if a patient will receive albumin in the next period; and a two-stage model that first predicts if any resuscitation fluid will be administered and then predicts albumin only among the patients with a high probability of fluid use.

Results

We examined 87,489 ICU episodes divided into approximately 1.5 million 4-h periods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 for both prediction models. The positive predictive value was 0.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.20, 0.23) for the single-stage model and 0.22 (0.20, 0.23) for the two-stage model. Applying either model in a targeted prompting system could prevent 10% of albumin administrations, with an attending physician receiving one prompt every 4.2 days of ICU service.

Conclusion

Prediction of low-value care is feasible and could enable a point-of-care, targeted prompting system that offers suggestions ahead of the moment of need before clinicians have already decided. A two-stage approach does not improve performance but does interject new levers for the calibration of such a system.

Abstract Image

基于机器学习的住院患者低价值护理预测
目的低价值护理(即费用昂贵但收效甚微或根本没有益处的保健治疗)是美国医院中一个持续存在的问题。减少低价值护理的传统策略只取得了适度的成功。根据行为科学原理,我们试图使用机器学习来通知有针对性的提示系统,该系统可以在临床医生做出决定之前,在护理点建议首选的替代治疗方法。方法:通过多医院卫生系统的电子健康记录,我们将重症监护病房(ICU)患者静脉注射白蛋白用于液体复苏作为低价值护理实践的范例。我们将所有ICU发作分为4小时的周期,并在周期水平上定义了一组相关的临床特征。然后,我们开发了两个机器学习模型:一个是单阶段模型,直接预测患者是否会在下一阶段接受白蛋白治疗;还有一个两阶段模型,首先预测是否需要使用任何复苏液体,然后预测白蛋白仅在高可能性使用液体的患者中使用。结果我们检查了87,489例ICU发作,分为约150万个4小时周期。两种预测模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积均为0.86。单阶段模型的阳性预测值为0.21(95%置信区间:0.20,0.23),两阶段模型的阳性预测值为0.22(0.20,0.23)。在有针对性的提示系统中应用任何一种模式都可以防止10%的白蛋白给药,主治医生每4.2天在ICU服务中收到一次提示。结论低价值护理的预测是可行的,可以实现一个即时、有针对性的提示系统,在临床医生做出决定之前,在需要的时刻提供建议。两阶段方法并不能提高性能,但确实为这种系统的校准插入了新的杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信