{"title":"New Perspectives in Innovation Failure Analysis: A taxonomy of general errors and strategic management for reducing risks","authors":"Mario Coccia","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In turbulent environments, one of the fundamental problems is the high risk of failure in new innovation projects that affects organizational behaviour and performance of firms and also nations. The study here clarifies the theoretical structure of project-level failure proposing a new definition, based on systems approach (<em>Innovation failure is when organization does not achieve the main goal of project because of a set of errors</em>), and a taxonomy of three general types of error in innovation failures: errors in planning and/or design, in project execution/implementation and in marketization. A case study research clarifies the proposed framework of innovation failures with examples from pharmaceutical sector, aerospace and aircraft industries, and information & communication technology sector. Results suggest that the failure in innovation projects is due to proposed errors associated mainly with bounded rationality of organizations in dealing with goal difficulty, environmental complexity and uncertainty. Different strategies of problem solving to reduce errors and risks leading to innovation failures and improve technological development are proposed, such as learning processes, adaptation perspective, game theory approach, stage-gate method, etc. The proposed systemic concept of innovation failure and related taxonomy of general typologies of error can guide R&D managers, designers, analysts, and policymakers etc. to know main determinants of failure in innovation projects and how appropriate strategies can improve organizational performance and R&D processes of firms for competitive advantage in markets and society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102384"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23001896/pdfft?md5=e87144bd26dc19242476e9b944f71c3f&pid=1-s2.0-S0160791X23001896-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23001896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In turbulent environments, one of the fundamental problems is the high risk of failure in new innovation projects that affects organizational behaviour and performance of firms and also nations. The study here clarifies the theoretical structure of project-level failure proposing a new definition, based on systems approach (Innovation failure is when organization does not achieve the main goal of project because of a set of errors), and a taxonomy of three general types of error in innovation failures: errors in planning and/or design, in project execution/implementation and in marketization. A case study research clarifies the proposed framework of innovation failures with examples from pharmaceutical sector, aerospace and aircraft industries, and information & communication technology sector. Results suggest that the failure in innovation projects is due to proposed errors associated mainly with bounded rationality of organizations in dealing with goal difficulty, environmental complexity and uncertainty. Different strategies of problem solving to reduce errors and risks leading to innovation failures and improve technological development are proposed, such as learning processes, adaptation perspective, game theory approach, stage-gate method, etc. The proposed systemic concept of innovation failure and related taxonomy of general typologies of error can guide R&D managers, designers, analysts, and policymakers etc. to know main determinants of failure in innovation projects and how appropriate strategies can improve organizational performance and R&D processes of firms for competitive advantage in markets and society.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.