New Perspectives in Innovation Failure Analysis: A taxonomy of general errors and strategic management for reducing risks

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Mario Coccia
{"title":"New Perspectives in Innovation Failure Analysis: A taxonomy of general errors and strategic management for reducing risks","authors":"Mario Coccia","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In turbulent environments, one of the fundamental problems is the high risk of failure in new innovation projects that affects organizational behaviour and performance of firms and also nations. The study here clarifies the theoretical structure of project-level failure proposing a new definition, based on systems approach (<em>Innovation failure is when organization does not achieve the main goal of project because of a set of errors</em>), and a taxonomy of three general types of error in innovation failures: errors in planning and/or design, in project execution/implementation and in marketization. A case study research clarifies the proposed framework of innovation failures with examples from pharmaceutical sector, aerospace and aircraft industries, and information &amp; communication technology sector. Results suggest that the failure in innovation projects is due to proposed errors associated mainly with bounded rationality of organizations in dealing with goal difficulty, environmental complexity and uncertainty. Different strategies of problem solving to reduce errors and risks leading to innovation failures and improve technological development are proposed, such as learning processes, adaptation perspective, game theory approach, stage-gate method, etc. The proposed systemic concept of innovation failure and related taxonomy of general typologies of error can guide R&amp;D managers, designers, analysts, and policymakers etc. to know main determinants of failure in innovation projects and how appropriate strategies can improve organizational performance and R&amp;D processes of firms for competitive advantage in markets and society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102384"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23001896/pdfft?md5=e87144bd26dc19242476e9b944f71c3f&pid=1-s2.0-S0160791X23001896-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23001896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In turbulent environments, one of the fundamental problems is the high risk of failure in new innovation projects that affects organizational behaviour and performance of firms and also nations. The study here clarifies the theoretical structure of project-level failure proposing a new definition, based on systems approach (Innovation failure is when organization does not achieve the main goal of project because of a set of errors), and a taxonomy of three general types of error in innovation failures: errors in planning and/or design, in project execution/implementation and in marketization. A case study research clarifies the proposed framework of innovation failures with examples from pharmaceutical sector, aerospace and aircraft industries, and information & communication technology sector. Results suggest that the failure in innovation projects is due to proposed errors associated mainly with bounded rationality of organizations in dealing with goal difficulty, environmental complexity and uncertainty. Different strategies of problem solving to reduce errors and risks leading to innovation failures and improve technological development are proposed, such as learning processes, adaptation perspective, game theory approach, stage-gate method, etc. The proposed systemic concept of innovation failure and related taxonomy of general typologies of error can guide R&D managers, designers, analysts, and policymakers etc. to know main determinants of failure in innovation projects and how appropriate strategies can improve organizational performance and R&D processes of firms for competitive advantage in markets and society.

Abstract Image

创新失败分析的新视角:一般错误的分类和降低风险的战略管理
在动荡的环境中,一个基本问题是新的创新项目失败的高风险,这会影响企业和国家的组织行为和绩效。本研究阐明了项目级失败的理论结构,提出了一个基于系统方法的新定义(创新失败是指组织由于一系列错误而未能实现项目的主要目标),并对创新失败中的三种常见错误进行了分类:规划和/或设计错误、项目执行/实施错误和市场化错误。案例研究以制药行业、航空航天行业和信息行业为例,阐明了创新失败的框架;通信技术领域。结果表明,创新项目的失败主要是由于组织在处理目标难度、环境复杂性和不确定性方面的有限理性所导致的。提出了不同的问题解决策略,以减少导致创新失败的错误和风险,促进技术发展,如学习过程、适应视角、博弈论方法、阶段-门方法等。提出的创新失败的系统概念和相关的错误一般类型分类法可以指导研发经理、设计师、分析师和政策制定者等了解创新项目失败的主要决定因素,以及适当的策略如何提高组织绩效和企业的研发过程,以获得市场和社会的竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信