Transformation for inclusive conservation: evidence on values, decisions, and impacts in protected areas

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer , Rachel A Neugarten , David Gonzalez-Jimenez , Gabby Ahmadia , Timothy D Baird , Nicole Crane , Elise Delgoulet , Harold N Eyster , Natalie Kurashima , Jorge C Llopis , Alice Millington , Agnieszka Pawlowska-Mainville , John Rulmal , Fred Saunders , Sushma Shrestha , Mehana Blaich Vaughan , Kawika B Winter , Supin Wongbusarakum , Unai Pascual
{"title":"Transformation for inclusive conservation: evidence on values, decisions, and impacts in protected areas","authors":"Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer ,&nbsp;Rachel A Neugarten ,&nbsp;David Gonzalez-Jimenez ,&nbsp;Gabby Ahmadia ,&nbsp;Timothy D Baird ,&nbsp;Nicole Crane ,&nbsp;Elise Delgoulet ,&nbsp;Harold N Eyster ,&nbsp;Natalie Kurashima ,&nbsp;Jorge C Llopis ,&nbsp;Alice Millington ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Pawlowska-Mainville ,&nbsp;John Rulmal ,&nbsp;Fred Saunders ,&nbsp;Sushma Shrestha ,&nbsp;Mehana Blaich Vaughan ,&nbsp;Kawika B Winter ,&nbsp;Supin Wongbusarakum ,&nbsp;Unai Pascual","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As countries consider new area-based conservation targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity, protected areas (PAs) and their impacts on people and nature are coming under increasing scrutiny. We review the evidence base on PA impacts, combining the findings from existing rigorous impact evaluations with local case studies developed for this study. We identify characteristics of PA establishment and management that improve the sustainability of biodiversity conservation<span><span> and justice for local communities. We find that recognizing and respecting local values and knowledge about </span>natural resource<span> stewardship, colearning, and comanagement<span> are key to achieving positive impacts for nature and people. Transforming PA governance toward more inclusive conservation depends upon the ability of PAs to be designed and implemented around the values and needs of local people.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101347"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As countries consider new area-based conservation targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity, protected areas (PAs) and their impacts on people and nature are coming under increasing scrutiny. We review the evidence base on PA impacts, combining the findings from existing rigorous impact evaluations with local case studies developed for this study. We identify characteristics of PA establishment and management that improve the sustainability of biodiversity conservation and justice for local communities. We find that recognizing and respecting local values and knowledge about natural resource stewardship, colearning, and comanagement are key to achieving positive impacts for nature and people. Transforming PA governance toward more inclusive conservation depends upon the ability of PAs to be designed and implemented around the values and needs of local people.

包容性保护的转型:关于保护区价值、决策和影响的证据
随着各国考虑根据《生物多样性公约》制定新的以区域为基础的保护目标,保护区及其对人类和自然的影响正受到越来越多的审查。我们将现有严格的影响评估结果与为本研究开发的本地案例研究相结合,回顾了PA影响的证据基础。我们确定了保护区建设和管理的特点,以提高生物多样性保护的可持续性和当地社区的正义。我们发现,认识和尊重当地关于自然资源管理、学习和管理的价值观和知识是实现对自然和人类产生积极影响的关键。将保护区治理转变为更具包容性的保护,取决于围绕当地人民的价值观和需求设计和实施保护区的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信