A multi-objective optimization design to generate surrogate machine learning models in explainable artificial intelligence applications

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Wellington Rodrigo Monteiro , Gilberto Reynoso-Meza
{"title":"A multi-objective optimization design to generate surrogate machine learning models in explainable artificial intelligence applications","authors":"Wellington Rodrigo Monteiro ,&nbsp;Gilberto Reynoso-Meza","doi":"10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Decision-making is crucial to the performance and well-being of any organization. While artificial intelligence algorithms are increasingly used in the industry for decision-making purposes, the adoption of decision-making techniques to develop new artificial intelligence models does not follow the same trend. Complex artificial intelligence algorithm structures such as gradient boosting, ensembles, and neural networks offer higher accuracy at the expense of transparency. In organizations, however, managers and other stakeholders need to understand how an algorithm came to a given decision to properly criticize, learn from, audit, and improve said algorithms. Among the most recent techniques to address this, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) algorithms offer a previously unforeseen level of interpretability, explainability, and informativeness to different human roles in the industry. XAI algorithms seek to balance the trade-off between interpretability and accuracy by introducing techniques that, for instance, explain the feature relevance in complex algorithms, generate counterfactual examples in “what-if?” analyses, and train surrogate models that are intrinsically explainable. However, while the trade-off between these two objectives is commonly referred to in the literature, only some proposals use multi-objective optimization in XAI applications. Therefore, this document proposes a new multi-objective optimization application to help decision-makers (for instance, data scientists) to generate new surrogate machine learning models based on black-box models. These surrogates are generated by a multi-objective problem that maximizes, at the same time, interpretability and accuracy. The proposed application also has a multi-criteria decision-making step to rank the best surrogates considering these two objectives. Results from five classification and regression datasets tested on four black-box models show that the proposed method can create simple surrogates maintaining high levels of accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44104,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943823000134/pdfft?md5=c0cfb4113c9d5700533e1ba3c3d4dfd1&pid=1-s2.0-S2193943823000134-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943823000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision-making is crucial to the performance and well-being of any organization. While artificial intelligence algorithms are increasingly used in the industry for decision-making purposes, the adoption of decision-making techniques to develop new artificial intelligence models does not follow the same trend. Complex artificial intelligence algorithm structures such as gradient boosting, ensembles, and neural networks offer higher accuracy at the expense of transparency. In organizations, however, managers and other stakeholders need to understand how an algorithm came to a given decision to properly criticize, learn from, audit, and improve said algorithms. Among the most recent techniques to address this, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) algorithms offer a previously unforeseen level of interpretability, explainability, and informativeness to different human roles in the industry. XAI algorithms seek to balance the trade-off between interpretability and accuracy by introducing techniques that, for instance, explain the feature relevance in complex algorithms, generate counterfactual examples in “what-if?” analyses, and train surrogate models that are intrinsically explainable. However, while the trade-off between these two objectives is commonly referred to in the literature, only some proposals use multi-objective optimization in XAI applications. Therefore, this document proposes a new multi-objective optimization application to help decision-makers (for instance, data scientists) to generate new surrogate machine learning models based on black-box models. These surrogates are generated by a multi-objective problem that maximizes, at the same time, interpretability and accuracy. The proposed application also has a multi-criteria decision-making step to rank the best surrogates considering these two objectives. Results from five classification and regression datasets tested on four black-box models show that the proposed method can create simple surrogates maintaining high levels of accuracy.

在可解释的人工智能应用中生成代理机器学习模型的多目标优化设计
决策对于任何组织的绩效和福利都是至关重要的。虽然人工智能算法在行业中越来越多地用于决策目的,但采用决策技术开发新的人工智能模型却没有遵循相同的趋势。复杂的人工智能算法结构,如梯度增强、集成和神经网络,以牺牲透明度为代价提供更高的准确性。然而,在组织中,管理人员和其他利益相关者需要了解算法是如何做出给定决策的,以便正确地批评、学习、审计和改进所述算法。在解决这个问题的最新技术中,可解释的人工智能(XAI)算法为行业中不同的人类角色提供了前所未有的可解释性、可解释性和信息性。XAI算法试图通过引入技术来平衡可解释性和准确性之间的权衡,例如,在复杂算法中解释特征相关性,在“如果?”中生成反事实示例。的分析,并训练本质上可解释的代理模型。然而,虽然这两个目标之间的权衡在文献中经常被提及,但只有一些建议在XAI应用程序中使用多目标优化。因此,本文提出了一种新的多目标优化应用,以帮助决策者(例如数据科学家)基于黑盒模型生成新的代理机器学习模型。这些替代品是由一个多目标问题产生的,同时最大化可解释性和准确性。提出的应用程序还具有多标准决策步骤,以考虑这两个目标对最佳代理进行排名。5个分类和回归数据集在4个黑箱模型上的测试结果表明,所提出的方法可以创建简单的代理,并保持较高的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信