Anesthetic, Sedation, and Analgesic Technique for Successful Local Anesthetic EndoSuture Aneurysm Repair.

IF 0.8 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Martin Hennessy, Keith Kelso Hussey
{"title":"Anesthetic, Sedation, and Analgesic Technique for Successful Local Anesthetic EndoSuture Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Martin Hennessy,&nbsp;Keith Kelso Hussey","doi":"10.5758/vsi.230003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to describe our technique for and experience with elective endovascular aneurysm repair using EndoAnchors under local anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included seven patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair using EndoAnchors with a standard regimen consisting of local anesthesia, intravenous sedation, and analgesia. The procedural and follow-up details were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six out of seven infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms were successfully treated with endovascular aneurysm repair using primary EndoAnchors under local anesthesia. One patient was converted to general anesthesia due to acute aneurysm thrombosis independent of EndoAnchor deployment during the procedure. Remifentanyl infusions of up to 3.2 mg/min, morphine doses up to 6 mg (median, 0.5 mg), and midazolam doses of up to 4 mg (mean, 1.4 mg) were used. The mean theater time was 83 minutes (range, 60-130 minutes). Two patients were discharged on day 0, and the mean hospital stay was one day. All patients were alive between 484 and 1,128 days post-procedure, with no aneurysm-specific reintervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of local anesthesia, intravenous sedation, and analgesia is a viable strategy for timely and effective endovascular aneurysm repair using EndoAnchors. This technique may allow endovascular repair of more ruptured aneurysms using EndoAnchors with potential survival benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":52311,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Specialist International","volume":"39 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/8a/vsi-39-3.PMC10040298.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Specialist International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5758/vsi.230003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to describe our technique for and experience with elective endovascular aneurysm repair using EndoAnchors under local anesthesia.

Materials and methods: We included seven patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair using EndoAnchors with a standard regimen consisting of local anesthesia, intravenous sedation, and analgesia. The procedural and follow-up details were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: Six out of seven infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms were successfully treated with endovascular aneurysm repair using primary EndoAnchors under local anesthesia. One patient was converted to general anesthesia due to acute aneurysm thrombosis independent of EndoAnchor deployment during the procedure. Remifentanyl infusions of up to 3.2 mg/min, morphine doses up to 6 mg (median, 0.5 mg), and midazolam doses of up to 4 mg (mean, 1.4 mg) were used. The mean theater time was 83 minutes (range, 60-130 minutes). Two patients were discharged on day 0, and the mean hospital stay was one day. All patients were alive between 484 and 1,128 days post-procedure, with no aneurysm-specific reintervention.

Conclusion: The combination of local anesthesia, intravenous sedation, and analgesia is a viable strategy for timely and effective endovascular aneurysm repair using EndoAnchors. This technique may allow endovascular repair of more ruptured aneurysms using EndoAnchors with potential survival benefits.

Abstract Image

成功的局部麻醉缝合动脉瘤修复术的麻醉、镇静和镇痛技术。
目的:我们的目的是描述我们在局部麻醉下使用endoanchor进行选择性血管内动脉瘤修复的技术和经验。材料和方法:我们纳入了7例腹主动脉瘤患者,他们接受了由局部麻醉、静脉镇静和镇痛组成的标准方案的endoanchor血管内动脉瘤修复术。对程序和后续细节进行了回顾性审查。结果:7例肾下腹主动脉瘤均在局麻下行一期endoanchor血管内动脉瘤修复术,成功治疗6例。1例患者在手术过程中因急性动脉瘤血栓形成而转为全麻,与EndoAnchor的部署无关。使用瑞芬太尼输液高达3.2 mg/min,吗啡剂量高达6mg(中位数,0.5 mg),咪达唑仑剂量高达4mg(平均,1.4 mg)。平均影院时间为83分钟(范围60-130分钟)。2例患者于第0天出院,平均住院时间1天。所有患者术后存活时间为484天至1128天,无动脉瘤特异性再干预。结论:局部麻醉、静脉镇静、镇痛相结合是及时有效的endoanchor修复血管内动脉瘤的可行策略。该技术可能允许使用endoanchor对更多破裂动脉瘤进行血管内修复,并具有潜在的生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信